Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Esophagus Resection | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Clinical Benefit of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy over Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Authors: Shigeru Tsunoda, MD, PhD, FACS, Kazutaka Obama, MD, PhD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was introduced to overcome the complexity of conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the early 2000s.1 In a recent randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial),2 RAMIE showed better short-term outcomes than totally open esophagectomy, including a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary and cardiac complications, faster functional recovery, and better quality of life. However, the favorable outcomes of RAMIE could be ascribed primarily to the study design, which maximized the difference of surgical trauma to the right thoracic and abdominal cavity. Therefore, it remains unclear whether robotic assistance in the setting of MIE has a real clinical benefit over conventional MIE. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127(6): 1847–9.CrossRef Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127(6): 1847–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019; 269(4): 621–30.CrossRef van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019; 269(4): 621–30.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tsunoda S, Shinohara H, Kanaya S, et al. Mesenteric excision of upper esophagus: a concept for rational anatomical lymphadenectomy of the recurrent laryngeal nodes in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34(1): 133–41.CrossRef Tsunoda S, Shinohara H, Kanaya S, et al. Mesenteric excision of upper esophagus: a concept for rational anatomical lymphadenectomy of the recurrent laryngeal nodes in thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34(1): 133–41.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yang Y, Zhang X, Li B, et al. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33(6):doz080.CrossRef Yang Y, Zhang X, Li B, et al. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33(6):doz080.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Clinical Benefit of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy over Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
Authors
Shigeru Tsunoda, MD, PhD, FACS
Kazutaka Obama, MD, PhD, FACS
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09082-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021 Go to the issue