Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Breast Oncology

Budget Impact Analysis of Preoperative Radioactive Seed Localization

Authors: Wyanne Law, MD, Nicole Look Hong, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Ananth Ravi, PhD, MCCPM, Lisa Day, MRT (R), CBI, Yasmin Somani, MRTNM, Frances C. Wright, MD, MEd, FRCPC, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, MD, FRCPC, William T. Tran, MRT(T), MSc, PhD, Belinda Curpen, MD, FRCPC

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study models costs in implementing a radioactive seed localization (RSL) program for nonpalpable breast lesions at a large Canadian tertiary hospital to replace existing wire-guided localization (WGL).

Methods

All direct and indirect operating costs of localization per lesion from the hospital’s perspective were determined by retrospectively reviewing patient data and costs from January 2014 to December 2016. A budget impact analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to calculate the mean cost per lesion, the minimum and maximum cost per lesion, operational costs, and initial costs.

Results

There were 265 WGL lesions in 2014 and 170 RSL lesions in 2016 included in cost calculation. The mean cost per localization was $185 CAD for WGL ($148–$311) and $283 CAD ($245–$517) for RSL using preloaded seeds, adjusted to 2016 Canadian dollars. The annual operational expenditure including all localizations and overhead costs was $49,835 for WGL and $80,803 for RSL. Initial costs for RSL were $22,000, including external training and new equipment purchases.

Conclusions

Our budget impact analysis shows that RSL using preloaded radioactive seeds was more expensive than WGL when considering per-lesion localization costs and specific costs related to radiation safety. Manually loading radioactive seed could be a cost-saving alternative to purchasing preloaded seeds. Our breakdown of costs can provide a framework for other centres to determine which localization method best suit their departments.
Literature
14.
go back to reference Jakub J, Maxwell R. Mayo School of Continuous Professional Development—Radioactive Seed Localized Breast Surgery Workshop.; 2014. Jakub J, Maxwell R. Mayo School of Continuous Professional Development—Radioactive Seed Localized Breast Surgery Workshop.; 2014.
19.
go back to reference Loving VA, Edwards DB, Roche KT, et al. Monte Carlo Simulation to analyze the cost-benefit of radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for breast-conserving surgery in fee-for-service health care systems compared with accountable care organizations. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1383–8. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.11368CrossRef Loving VA, Edwards DB, Roche KT, et al. Monte Carlo Simulation to analyze the cost-benefit of radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for breast-conserving surgery in fee-for-service health care systems compared with accountable care organizations. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1383–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2214/​ajr.​13.​11368CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Budget Impact Analysis of Preoperative Radioactive Seed Localization
Authors
Wyanne Law, MD
Nicole Look Hong, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Ananth Ravi, PhD, MCCPM
Lisa Day, MRT (R), CBI
Yasmin Somani, MRTNM
Frances C. Wright, MD, MEd, FRCPC
Sharon Nofech-Mozes, MD, FRCPC
William T. Tran, MRT(T), MSc, PhD
Belinda Curpen, MD, FRCPC
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09071-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2021 Go to the issue