Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Cervical Cancer | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes

Authors: Vanna Zanagnolo, MD, Alessia Aloisi, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

The introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has had a dramatic impact on the health care management of endometrial and cervical cancer patients. Prior to the results of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial1 becoming available, guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) indicated that either laparotomy or MIS (laparoscopy or robotic) were acceptable approaches to radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage (IA2–IIA) cervical cancer. …
Literature
1.
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904.CrossRef
2.
3.
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Kucukmetin A, et al. SUCCOR study. An international european cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009, < 4 cm) cervical cancer operated in 2013–2014. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019:29:A1–2.
4.
Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, et al. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2019;116:169–77.CrossRef
5.
Falconer H, Palsdottir K, Stalberg K, et al. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(6):1072–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes
Authors
Vanna Zanagnolo, MD
Alessia Aloisi, MD
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09057-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2021 Go to the issue

ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Re-Excision for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Who Is at Risk?

Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Perioperative Cancer Care in the Context of Limited Resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Recommendations

Sarcoma

Renal Function After Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection with Nephrectomy: A Matched Analysis of the United States Sarcoma Collaborative Database

ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Spotlight on Malignant Peritoneal Cytology in Uterine Sarcoma: A Potential Avenue for Future Research

Colorectal Cancer

Impact of Postoperative Complications on Oncologic Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium

Sarcoma

The Landmark Series: Desmoid