Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2020

01-12-2020 | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: A Surgery-First Approach for Patients With Clinical Stage 1 Signet Ring Cell Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Authors: Michael K. Turgeon, MD, Shishir K. Maithel, MD, Mihir M. Shah, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Signet ring cell histology is a relatively common variant of gastric adenocarcinoma that encompasses 35% to 40% of cases.1 Historically, signet ring cell histology has been considered a more aggressive subtype associated with a worse long-term prognosis.2 As a result, many clinicians favor the use of neoadjuvant or perioperative therapies to address the fact that patients may be clinically understaged and to target micrometastatic disease. However, current stage-specific data are sparse, and the optimal management strategy remains controversial. This study sought to assess the validity of a surgery-first versus a multimodality approach to clinical stage 1 gastric adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell histology.3
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pernot S, Voron T, Perkins G, Lagorce-Pages C, Berger A, Taieb J. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11428–38.CrossRef Pernot S, Voron T, Perkins G, Lagorce-Pages C, Berger A, Taieb J. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11428–38.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Piessen G, Messager M, Leteurtre E, Jean-Pierre T, Mariette C. Signet ring cell histology is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma regardless of tumoral clinical presentation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:878–87.CrossRef Piessen G, Messager M, Leteurtre E, Jean-Pierre T, Mariette C. Signet ring cell histology is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma regardless of tumoral clinical presentation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:878–87.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–57.CrossRef Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–57.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: A Surgery-First Approach for Patients With Clinical Stage 1 Signet Ring Cell Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Authors
Michael K. Turgeon, MD
Shishir K. Maithel, MD
Mihir M. Shah, MD
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08718-w

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2020 Go to the issue