Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Pancreatic Tumors

The Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection: Moving from Initial Adoption to Thoughtful Dissemination

Authors: Daniel A. Anaya, MD, Ugwuji Maduekwe, MD, Jin He, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

The International Consensus Conference on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery to review and vote on a final draft of guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) took place on 18–19 March 2019 in Miami. The Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) provided sponsorship support of the meeting. The recent publication of the Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection indicated SSO endorsement of the guidelines. The MIPR guidelines were reviewed by three members of the SSO Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Disease Site Working Group and three members of the SSO Quality Committee. Reviewers agreed the MIPR guidelines were well developed through the use of a validated methodology, the involvement of multiple stakeholders, and critical review by an audience of surgeons with an interest in pancreatic cancer. Although there are limitations in the data available to support the MIPR guidelines, reviewers felt this was acknowledged by authors, and their ‘call’ to the profession is to do better. Additionally, reviewers felt the potential impact of the guidelines is significant with respect to the creation of a framework to help guide the advancement and dissemination of novel surgical techniques without compromising the provision of safe, high-quality care. Based on the reviewer’s feedback and recommendations, the SSO leadership agreed that the Society endorse the guidelines. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14.CrossRef Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Klompmaker S, van Zoggel DM, Watkins AA, et al. Nationwide evaluation of patient selection for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy using American College of Surgeons’ National Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):1055–1061.CrossRef Klompmaker S, van Zoggel DM, Watkins AA, et al. Nationwide evaluation of patient selection for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy using American College of Surgeons’ National Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):1055–1061.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ellis RJ, Zhang LM, Ko CY, et al. Variation in hospital utilization of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for localized pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. Epub 25 Nov 2019. Ellis RJ, Zhang LM, Ko CY, et al. Variation in hospital utilization of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for localized pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. Epub 25 Nov 2019.
6.
go back to reference van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(3):199–207.CrossRef van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(3):199–207.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Torphy RJ, Friedman C, Halpern A, et al. Comparing short-term and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy across low and high volume centers. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1147–1155.CrossRef Torphy RJ, Friedman C, Halpern A, et al. Comparing short-term and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy across low and high volume centers. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1147–1155.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference King JC, Zeh HJ 3rd, Zureikat AH, et al. Safety in numbers: progressive implementation of a robotics program in an academic surgical oncology practice. Surg Innov. 2016;23(4):407–414.CrossRef King JC, Zeh HJ 3rd, Zureikat AH, et al. Safety in numbers: progressive implementation of a robotics program in an academic surgical oncology practice. Surg Innov. 2016;23(4):407–414.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356–1363.CrossRef Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356–1363.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346–1355.CrossRef Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346–1355.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117–2127.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117–2127.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, et al. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):664–672.CrossRef Hata T, Motoi F, Ishida M, et al. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):664–672.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moekotte AL, Rawashdeh A, Asbun HJ, et al. Safe implementation of minimally invasive pancreas resection: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). Epub 10 Dec 2019. Moekotte AL, Rawashdeh A, Asbun HJ, et al. Safe implementation of minimally invasive pancreas resection: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). Epub 10 Dec 2019.
15.
go back to reference Hogg ME, Besselink MG, Clavien PA, et al. Training in Minimally invasive pancreatic resections: a paradigm shift away from “See one, Do one, Teach one”. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):234–245.CrossRef Hogg ME, Besselink MG, Clavien PA, et al. Training in Minimally invasive pancreatic resections: a paradigm shift away from “See one, Do one, Teach one”. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):234–245.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Boerma D, et al. Impact of a nationwide training program in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (LAELAPS). Ann Surg. 2016;264(5):754–762.CrossRef de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Boerma D, et al. Impact of a nationwide training program in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (LAELAPS). Ann Surg. 2016;264(5):754–762.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hogg ME, Tam V, Zenati M, et al. Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic proficiency. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(3):477–485.CrossRef Hogg ME, Tam V, Zenati M, et al. Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic proficiency. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(3):477–485.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection: Moving from Initial Adoption to Thoughtful Dissemination
Authors
Daniel A. Anaya, MD
Ugwuji Maduekwe, MD
Jin He, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08254-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2020 Go to the issue