Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2019

01-11-2019 | Mastectomy | Breast Oncology

Saving the Male Breast: A Systematic Literature Review of Breast-Conservation Surgery for Male Breast Cancer

Authors: L. M. De La Cruz, MD, P. T. R. Thiruchelvam, MD, J. Shivani, MD, J. Trina, MD, S. A. Blankenship, MD, C. S. Fisher, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Male breast cancer (MBC) management is extrapolated from female BC. Mastectomy remains the most frequently used surgical procedure for male breast cancer (MBC). We performed a literature review to assess the use of breast-conservation (BCS) in MBC as well as outcomes following BCS.

Methods

A systematic literature was performed, and articles screened to identify studies that measured overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or local recurrence (LR) in patients undergoing BCS. Weighted averages based on study size were performed for LR, DFS, and 5-year OS.

Results

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria with male breast surgery cases, and 859 (14.7%) underwent BCS. The mean follow-up time was 53 months, and mean age was 62.6 years, with stage II as the most common presentation. Two studies reported that 50–71.4% of patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, and four studies reported axillary lymph node dissection in 14.3–100%. Five studies reported on adjuvant radiation therapy in 12.0–100% of total patients undergoing BCS. Four studies reported use of hormonal therapy in 73.8–100% of patients. Four studies reported use of chemotherapy in 25–66.7% of patients. Seven studies reported LR among 116 patients, with a weighted average of 9.9%. Three studies reported on DFS in 14 patients, with a weighted average 85.6%. Two studies report OS in 143 patients with a weighted average of 84.4%.

Conclusions

Breast conservation may be considered a safe alternative in the surgical treatment of MBC. Future research should focus on better standardization of local therapy for MBC and improved reporting of outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Speirs V, Shaaban AM. The rising incidence of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:429–30.CrossRef Speirs V, Shaaban AM. The rising incidence of male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:429–30.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goss PE, Reid C, Pintilie M, Lim R, Miller N. Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955–1996. Cancer. 1999;85:629–39.CrossRef Goss PE, Reid C, Pintilie M, Lim R, Miller N. Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955–1996. Cancer. 1999;85:629–39.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cutuli B, Lacroze M, Dilhuydy JM, et al. Male breast cancer: results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1960–4.CrossRef Cutuli B, Lacroze M, Dilhuydy JM, et al. Male breast cancer: results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1960–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guinee VF, Olsson H, Moller T, et al. The prognosis of breast cancer in males: a report of 335 cases. Cancer. 1993;71:154–61.CrossRef Guinee VF, Olsson H, Moller T, et al. The prognosis of breast cancer in males: a report of 335 cases. Cancer. 1993;71:154–61.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018.
7.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark NN. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.CrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark NN. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Zucali R, Luini A. Local control and survival in early breast cancer: the Milan trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12(5):717–20.CrossRef Veronesi U, Zucali R, Luini A. Local control and survival in early breast cancer: the Milan trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986;12(5):717–20.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, Rutgers E, Christiaens MR, Van Limbergen E, Baaijens MH, Bogaerts J, Bartelink H. EORTC—breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I–II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(4):412–9.CrossRef Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, Rutgers E, Christiaens MR, Van Limbergen E, Baaijens MH, Bogaerts J, Bartelink H. EORTC—breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I–II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(4):412–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cloyd JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wapnir IL. Outcomes of partial mastectomy in male breast cancer patients: analysis of SEER, 1983–2009. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1545–50.CrossRef Cloyd JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wapnir IL. Outcomes of partial mastectomy in male breast cancer patients: analysis of SEER, 1983–2009. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1545–50.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Günhan-Bilgen I, Bozkaya H, Ustün E. Male breast disease: clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic features. Eur J Radiol. 2002;43(3):246–55.CrossRef Günhan-Bilgen I, Bozkaya H, Ustün E. Male breast disease: clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic features. Eur J Radiol. 2002;43(3):246–55.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cutuli B, Lacroze M, Dilhuydy JM, Velten M, De Lafontan B, Marchal C, Resbeut M, Graic Y, Campana F, Moncho-Bernier V, et al. Male breast cancer: results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(12):1960–4.CrossRef Cutuli B, Lacroze M, Dilhuydy JM, Velten M, De Lafontan B, Marchal C, Resbeut M, Graic Y, Campana F, Moncho-Bernier V, et al. Male breast cancer: results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(12):1960–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Golshan M, Rusby J, Dominguez F, Smith BL. Breast conservation for male breast carcinoma. Breast. 2007;16(6):653–6.CrossRef Golshan M, Rusby J, Dominguez F, Smith BL. Breast conservation for male breast carcinoma. Breast. 2007;16(6):653–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Serarslan A, Gursel B, Okumus NO, Meydan D, Sullu Y, Gonullu G. Male breast cancer: 20 years experience of a tertiary hospital from the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6673–9.CrossRef Serarslan A, Gursel B, Okumus NO, Meydan D, Sullu Y, Gonullu G. Male breast cancer: 20 years experience of a tertiary hospital from the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6673–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yildirim E, Berberoğlu U. Male breast cancer: a 22-year experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24(6):548–52.CrossRef Yildirim E, Berberoğlu U. Male breast cancer: a 22-year experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24(6):548–52.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Morrow M, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer: bigger is not better. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:79–82.CrossRef Morrow M, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer: bigger is not better. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:79–82.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Leone JP, Leone J, Zwenger AO, Iturbe J, Leone BA, Vallejo CT. Locoregional treatment and overall survival of men with T1a,b,cN0M0 breast cancer: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2017;71:7–14.CrossRef Leone JP, Leone J, Zwenger AO, Iturbe J, Leone BA, Vallejo CT. Locoregional treatment and overall survival of men with T1a,b,cN0M0 breast cancer: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2017;71:7–14.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Saving the Male Breast: A Systematic Literature Review of Breast-Conservation Surgery for Male Breast Cancer
Authors
L. M. De La Cruz, MD
P. T. R. Thiruchelvam, MD
J. Shivani, MD
J. Trina, MD
S. A. Blankenship, MD
C. S. Fisher, MD
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07588-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2019 Go to the issue