Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2019

01-11-2019 | Rectal Cancer | Colorectal Cancer

Combined Proctectomy and Hepatectomy for Metastatic Rectal Cancer: Safe for the Fit and Able—But for Everyone?

Authors: James R. Barrett, MD, Daniel E. Abbott, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

This month’s issue of Annals of Surgical Oncology features a publication by Concors et al. illustrating contemporary variability in outcomes for patients undergoing combined hepatectomy and proctectomy (C-PH) for rectal cancer.1 Importantly, this study provides increasing evidence that C-PH at high-volume centers is safe and can be primarily utilized for patients with synchronous hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer; these data are critical for patient counseling and surgical decision making. Furthermore, the authors are able to identify a subset of patients, particularly those who are older and more frail, in whom C-PH should be approached with extreme caution. This clinically relevant, multi-institutional investigation capitalizes on the strengths of the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) in reporting real-world utilization and outcomes in the US. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Concors SJ, Vining CM, et al. Combined proctectomy and hepatectomy for metastatic rectal cancer should be undertaken with caution: results of a national cohort study annals of surgical oncology. In Press Concors SJ, Vining CM, et al. Combined proctectomy and hepatectomy for metastatic rectal cancer should be undertaken with caution: results of a national cohort study annals of surgical oncology. In Press
2.
go back to reference Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244(2):254–259.CrossRef Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244(2):254–259.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Robertson DJ, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Sutherland JM, Fisher ES. Survival after hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases: a national experience. Cancer. 2009;115(4):752–759.CrossRef Robertson DJ, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Sutherland JM, Fisher ES. Survival after hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases: a national experience. Cancer. 2009;115(4):752–759.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schlag PM, Benhidjeb T, Stroszczynski C. Resection and local therapy for liver metastases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;16(2):299-317.CrossRef Schlag PM, Benhidjeb T, Stroszczynski C. Resection and local therapy for liver metastases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;16(2):299-317.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abelson JS, Michelassi F, Sun T, et al. Simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: the new standard of care? J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(6):975–982.CrossRef Abelson JS, Michelassi F, Sun T, et al. Simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: the new standard of care? J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(6):975–982.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Silberhumer GR, Paty PB, Temple LK, et al. Simultaneous resection for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis is a safe procedure. Am J Surg. 2015;209(6):935–942.CrossRef Silberhumer GR, Paty PB, Temple LK, et al. Simultaneous resection for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis is a safe procedure. Am J Surg. 2015;209(6):935–942.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hamed OH, Bhayani NH, Ortenzi G, et al. Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic procedures for colorectal cancer result in increased morbidity but equivalent mortality compared with colorectal or hepatic procedures alone: outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(9):695–702.CrossRef Hamed OH, Bhayani NH, Ortenzi G, et al. Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic procedures for colorectal cancer result in increased morbidity but equivalent mortality compared with colorectal or hepatic procedures alone: outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(9):695–702.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pablo ES, Gafni A, Parpia S, Ruo L, Simunovic M, Meyers BM, Reiter H, et al. Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases (RESECT), a pilot study. Int J Surg Protoc. 2018;8:1–6CrossRef Pablo ES, Gafni A, Parpia S, Ruo L, Simunovic M, Meyers BM, Reiter H, et al. Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases (RESECT), a pilot study. Int J Surg Protoc. 2018;8:1–6CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Munoz E, Munoz W 3rd, Wise L. National and surgical health care expenditures, 2005–2025. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):195–200.CrossRef Munoz E, Munoz W 3rd, Wise L. National and surgical health care expenditures, 2005–2025. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):195–200.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Abbott DE, Cantor SB, Hu CY, et al. Optimizing clinical and economic outcomes of surgical therapy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(2):262–270.CrossRef Abbott DE, Cantor SB, Hu CY, et al. Optimizing clinical and economic outcomes of surgical therapy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(2):262–270.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combined Proctectomy and Hepatectomy for Metastatic Rectal Cancer: Safe for the Fit and Able—But for Everyone?
Authors
James R. Barrett, MD
Daniel E. Abbott, MD
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07500-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2019 Go to the issue