Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2019

01-08-2019 | NSCLC | Thoracic Oncology

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Candidates in Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas Following Complete Lobectomy

Authors: Jie Qian, MD, Jianlin Xu, MD, PhD, Shuyuan Wang, MD, Fangfei Qian, MD, Wenjia Yang, MD, Bo Zhang, MD, Yanwei Zhang, MD, PhD, Wei Nie, MD, PhD, Yuqing Lou, MD, PhD, Jun Lu, MD, PhD, Xueyan Zhang, MD, PhD, Wei Zhang, MD, PhD, Tianqing Chu, MD, PhD, Hua Zhong, MD, PhD, Wentao Fang, MD, PhD, Heng Zhao, MD, PhD, Baohui Han, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to explore adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) candidates based on a recurrence risk-scoring model in completely lobectomized stage I patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LAD).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 4606 patients (non-ACT group: n = 3514; ACT group: n = 1092) who underwent complete lobectomy for LAD at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2008 to 2014. The nomogram predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) was developed in the non-ACT group using Cox proportional hazards regression. The nomogram-based risk score was calculated in the entire cohort. Differences of RFS between the non-ACT and ACT groups were compared as stratified by the risk score. The score cut-off points were determined using the X-tile software.

Results

Six independent predictors, including age, sex, tumor size, pathological subtype, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were associated with RFS. The nomogram more accurately predicted RFS than the 8th TNM staging {C-index: 0.784 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.756–0.812] vs. 0.719 (95% CI 0.689–0.749), p = 0.0017}. A significant RFS difference was observed among the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups (p < 0.0001), as divided by the optimal cut-points of risk score (203 and 244). ACT did not improve RFS for patients at intermediate-risk, or was even detrimental for low-risk patients; however, improved RFS was observed in ACT receivers at high-risk (p = 0.0416). ACT candidates with a risk score ≥ 245 constituted 2.6% of stage I patients.

Conclusions

The nomogram provided an individual prediction of RFS for stage I LAD following lobectomy. High-risk patients (score ≥ 245) may benefit from postoperative ACT.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McDonald F, De Waele M, Hendriks LE, et al. Management of stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2017;49: pii: 1600764.CrossRef McDonald F, De Waele M, Hendriks LE, et al. Management of stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2017;49: pii: 1600764.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yang HC, Kim HR, Jheon S, et al. Recurrence risk-scoring model for stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:4089-97.CrossRefPubMed Yang HC, Kim HR, Jheon S, et al. Recurrence risk-scoring model for stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:4089-97.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goodgame B, Viswanathan A, Zoole J, et al. Risk of recurrence of resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients as compared with younger patients. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:1370-4.CrossRefPubMed Goodgame B, Viswanathan A, Zoole J, et al. Risk of recurrence of resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients as compared with younger patients. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:1370-4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ujiie H, Kadota K, Chaft JE, et al. Solid predominant histologic subtype in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma is an independent predictor of early, extrathoracic, multisite recurrence and of poor postrecurrence survival. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2877-84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ujiie H, Kadota K, Chaft JE, et al. Solid predominant histologic subtype in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma is an independent predictor of early, extrathoracic, multisite recurrence and of poor postrecurrence survival. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2877-84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:39-51.CrossRefPubMed Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:39-51.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kris MG, Gaspar LE, Chaft JE, et al. Adjuvant systemic therapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stage I to IIIA completely resected non-small-cell lung cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology/Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:2960-74.CrossRefPubMed Kris MG, Gaspar LE, Chaft JE, et al. Adjuvant systemic therapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stage I to IIIA completely resected non-small-cell lung cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology/Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:2960-74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017;15:504-35.CrossRefPubMed Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017;15:504-35.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3552-9.CrossRefPubMed Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3552-9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Burdett S, Pignon JP, Tierney J, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(3):CD011430. Burdett S, Pignon JP, Tierney J, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(3):CD011430.
10.
go back to reference Butts CA, Ding K, Seymour L, et al. Randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in completely resected stage IB and II non-small-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of JBR-10. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:29-34.CrossRefPubMed Butts CA, Ding K, Seymour L, et al. Randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in completely resected stage IB and II non-small-cell lung cancer: updated survival analysis of JBR-10. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:29-34.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:719-27.CrossRefPubMed Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2006;7:719-27.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Strauss GM, Herndon JE 2nd, Maddaus MA, et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5043-51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Strauss GM, Herndon JE 2nd, Maddaus MA, et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5043-51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Mineo TC, Ambrogi V, Corsaro V, et al. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:378-84.CrossRefPubMed Mineo TC, Ambrogi V, Corsaro V, et al. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:378-84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ou SH, Zell JA, Ziogas A, et al. Prognostic factors for survival of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer patients: a population-based analysis of 19,702 stage I patients in the California Cancer Registry from 1989 to 2003. Cancer 2007;110:1532-41.CrossRefPubMed Ou SH, Zell JA, Ziogas A, et al. Prognostic factors for survival of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer patients: a population-based analysis of 19,702 stage I patients in the California Cancer Registry from 1989 to 2003. Cancer 2007;110:1532-41.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Liang W, Zhang L, Jiang G, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:861-9.CrossRefPubMed Liang W, Zhang L, Jiang G, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:861-9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lardinois D, De Leyn P, Van Schil P, et al. ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:787-92.CrossRefPubMed Lardinois D, De Leyn P, Van Schil P, et al. ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:787-92.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:244-85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:244-85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:7252-9.CrossRef Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:7252-9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zhang J, Wu J, Tan Q, et al. Why do pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinomas vary from prognosis?: A clinicopathologic study of 176 patients with pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1196-202.CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Wu J, Tan Q, et al. Why do pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinomas vary from prognosis?: A clinicopathologic study of 176 patients with pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1196-202.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Luo J, Wang R, Han B, et al. Solid predominant histologic subtype and early recurrence predict poor postrecurrence survival in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2017;8(4):7050–7058.CrossRefPubMed Luo J, Wang R, Han B, et al. Solid predominant histologic subtype and early recurrence predict poor postrecurrence survival in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2017;8(4):7050–7058.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Luo J, Huang Q, Wang R, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the novel classification of lung adenocarcinoma in patients with stage IB. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016;142:2031-40.CrossRefPubMed Luo J, Huang Q, Wang R, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the novel classification of lung adenocarcinoma in patients with stage IB. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016;142:2031-40.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Yanagawa N, Shiono S, Abiko M, et al. The clinical impact of solid and micropapillary patterns in resected lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1976-83.CrossRefPubMed Yanagawa N, Shiono S, Abiko M, et al. The clinical impact of solid and micropapillary patterns in resected lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1976-83.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Matsuoka Y, Yurugi Y, Takagi Y, et al. prognostic significance of solid and micropapillary components in invasive lung adenocarcinomas measuring ≤ 3 cm. Anticancer Res 2016;36:4923-30.CrossRefPubMed Matsuoka Y, Yurugi Y, Takagi Y, et al. prognostic significance of solid and micropapillary components in invasive lung adenocarcinomas measuring ≤ 3 cm. Anticancer Res 2016;36:4923-30.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ, et al. Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol 2011;24:653-64.CrossRefPubMed Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ, et al. Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol 2011;24:653-64.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lee HY, Cha MJ, Lee KS, et al. Prognosis in resected invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas of the lung: related factors and comparison with resected nonmucinous adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1064-73.CrossRefPubMed Lee HY, Cha MJ, Lee KS, et al. Prognosis in resected invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas of the lung: related factors and comparison with resected nonmucinous adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:1064-73.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Yoshizawa A, Sumiyoshi S, Sonobe M, et al. Validation of the IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification for prognosis and association with EGFR and KRAS gene mutations: analysis of 440 Japanese patients. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:52-61.CrossRefPubMed Yoshizawa A, Sumiyoshi S, Sonobe M, et al. Validation of the IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification for prognosis and association with EGFR and KRAS gene mutations: analysis of 440 Japanese patients. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:52-61.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sun Z, Aubry MC, Deschamps C, et al. Histologic grade is an independent prognostic factor for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 5018 hospital- and 712 population-based cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1014-20.CrossRefPubMed Sun Z, Aubry MC, Deschamps C, et al. Histologic grade is an independent prognostic factor for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 5018 hospital- and 712 population-based cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:1014-20.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Sun Y, Xiang J, et al. A clinicopathologic prediction model for postoperative recurrence in stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1193-9.CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Sun Y, Xiang J, et al. A clinicopathologic prediction model for postoperative recurrence in stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1193-9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kim YT, Seong YW, Jung YJ, et al. The presence of mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor gene is not a prognostic factor for long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:171-8.CrossRefPubMed Kim YT, Seong YW, Jung YJ, et al. The presence of mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor gene is not a prognostic factor for long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:171-8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Metadata
Title
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Candidates in Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas Following Complete Lobectomy
Authors
Jie Qian, MD
Jianlin Xu, MD, PhD
Shuyuan Wang, MD
Fangfei Qian, MD
Wenjia Yang, MD
Bo Zhang, MD
Yanwei Zhang, MD, PhD
Wei Nie, MD, PhD
Yuqing Lou, MD, PhD
Jun Lu, MD, PhD
Xueyan Zhang, MD, PhD
Wei Zhang, MD, PhD
Tianqing Chu, MD, PhD
Hua Zhong, MD, PhD
Wentao Fang, MD, PhD
Heng Zhao, MD, PhD
Baohui Han, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07366-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2019 Go to the issue