Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Mastectomy | Breast Oncology

Impact of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guideline on Rates of Re-excision After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Authors: Liska Havel, MD, MPH, Himani Naik, MPH, Luis Ramirez, MPH, Monica Morrow, MD, Jeffrey Landercasper, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One in five patients undergoing initial lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer subsequently undergoes re-excision or mastectomy. A lack of clarity of when to re-excise based on lumpectomy margin width contributes to this high rate of reoperation. We sought to determine the impact of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) and American Society of Radiation Oncologist (ASTRO) margin guideline on reoperation rates after lumpectomy. The guideline recommended omission of routine re-excision in specimens with “no ink on tumor”.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed. For eligible studies, a random-effects model was used for a meta-analysis of lumpectomy re-excision prevalence before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline. Study heterogeneity was measured by the Cochran’s Q test.

Results

Five institutional, one population-based, and one national registry study met inclusion requirements. Sample size per study ranged from 237 to 26,102. There was significant interstudy heterogeneity (Q = 19.779; p = 0.003). Pooled re-excision prevalence was 22% (confidence interval [CI] 20–23) before and 14% (CI 12–15) after guideline publication. With the pre-guideline re-excision prevalence used as the reference value, the associated odds ratio for re-excision after the guideline was 0.65 (CI 0.54–0.78; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The findings of a 35% reduction in the odds of re-excision after the guideline publication and a reduction in re-excision prevalence from 22 to 14% supports the notion that the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline was impactful. These findings are congruent with the projected reductions in re-excision at the time of guideline publication.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cody III HS, Van Zee KJ. Reexcision—the other breast cancer epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:568–9.CrossRefPubMed Cody III HS, Van Zee KJ. Reexcision—the other breast cancer epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:568–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McCahill LE, Single RM, Bowles EJA, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467–75.CrossRefPubMed McCahill LE, Single RM, Bowles EJA, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467–75.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the national cancer data base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1296–305.CrossRefPubMed Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the national cancer data base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1296–305.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO, Vajdic CM, et al. Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO, Vajdic CM, et al. Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Rosenberger LH, Mamtani A, Fuzesi S, et al. Early adoption of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: initial experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3239–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rosenberger LH, Mamtani A, Fuzesi S, et al. Early adoption of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer: initial experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3239–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Schulman AM, Mirrielees JA, Leverson G, et al. Reexcision surgery for breast cancer: an analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery SM database following the SSO-ASTRO “no ink on tumor” guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:52–8.CrossRefPubMed Schulman AM, Mirrielees JA, Leverson G, et al. Reexcision surgery for breast cancer: an analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery SM database following the SSO-ASTRO “no ink on tumor” guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:52–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MasterySM database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3185–91.CrossRefPubMed Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MasterySM database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3185–91.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of surgical oncology-American society for radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:553–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of surgical oncology-American society for radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:553–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:717–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:717–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Singer L, Brown E, Lanni Jr T. Margins in breast conserving surgery: the financial cost and potential savings associated with the new margin guidelines. Breast. 2016;28:1–4.CrossRefPubMed Singer L, Brown E, Lanni Jr T. Margins in breast conserving surgery: the financial cost and potential savings associated with the new margin guidelines. Breast. 2016;28:1–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Merrill AL, Coopey SB, Tang R, et al. Implications of new lumpectomy margin guidelines for breast-conserving surgery: changes in reexcision rates and predicted rates of residual tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:729–34.CrossRefPubMed Merrill AL, Coopey SB, Tang R, et al. Implications of new lumpectomy margin guidelines for breast-conserving surgery: changes in reexcision rates and predicted rates of residual tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:729–34.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Greenup RA, Peppercorn J, Worni M, Hwang ES. Cost implications of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1512–4.CrossRefPubMed Greenup RA, Peppercorn J, Worni M, Hwang ES. Cost implications of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation in stage I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1512–4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Baliski C, Pataky R. Influence of the SSO/ASTRO margin reexcision guidelines on costs associated with breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:632–7.CrossRefPubMed Baliski C, Pataky R. Influence of the SSO/ASTRO margin reexcision guidelines on costs associated with breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:632–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bhutiani N, Mercer MK, Bachman KC, et al. Evaluating the effect of margin consensus guideline publication on operative patterns and financial impact of breast cancer operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227:6–11.CrossRefPubMed Bhutiani N, Mercer MK, Bachman KC, et al. Evaluating the effect of margin consensus guideline publication on operative patterns and financial impact of breast cancer operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227:6–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Abe SE, Hill JS, Han Y, et al. Margin re‐excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: a cost analysis using a decision tree model. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:443–8.CrossRefPubMed Abe SE, Hill JS, Han Y, et al. Margin re‐excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: a cost analysis using a decision tree model. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:443–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Morrow M, Abrahamse P, Hofer TP, et al. Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1352–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morrow M, Abrahamse P, Hofer TP, et al. Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1352–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Chung A, Gangi A, Amersi F, et al. Impact of consensus guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on margins for breast-conserving surgery in stages 1 and 2 invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:422–7.CrossRef Chung A, Gangi A, Amersi F, et al. Impact of consensus guidelines by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology on margins for breast-conserving surgery in stages 1 and 2 invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:422–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Patten CR, Walsh K, Sarantou T, et al. Changes in margin re‐excision rates: Experience incorporating the “no ink on tumor” guideline into practice. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1040–5.CrossRefPubMed Patten CR, Walsh K, Sarantou T, et al. Changes in margin re‐excision rates: Experience incorporating the “no ink on tumor” guideline into practice. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1040–5.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gladden AAH, Sams S, Gleisner A, et al. Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines. Am J Surg. 2017;214:1104–9.CrossRef Gladden AAH, Sams S, Gleisner A, et al. Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines. Am J Surg. 2017;214:1104–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, et al. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:974–8.CrossRefPubMed Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, et al. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67:974–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
25.
go back to reference Adegboyega TO, Landercasper J, Linebarger JH, et al. Institutional review of compliance with NCCN guidelines for breast cancer: lessons learned from real-time multidimensional synoptic reporting. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13:177–83.CrossRefPubMed Adegboyega TO, Landercasper J, Linebarger JH, et al. Institutional review of compliance with NCCN guidelines for breast cancer: lessons learned from real-time multidimensional synoptic reporting. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13:177–83.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dull B, Linkugel A, Margenthaler JA, Cyr AE. Overuse of chest CT in patients with stage I and II breast cancer: an opportunity to increase guidelines compliance at an NCCN Member Institution. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15:783–9.CrossRefPubMed Dull B, Linkugel A, Margenthaler JA, Cyr AE. Overuse of chest CT in patients with stage I and II breast cancer: an opportunity to increase guidelines compliance at an NCCN Member Institution. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2017;15:783–9.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Greenberg CC, Lipsitz SR, Hughes ME, et al. Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN. Ann Surg. 2011;254:339–45.CrossRefPubMed Greenberg CC, Lipsitz SR, Hughes ME, et al. Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN. Ann Surg. 2011;254:339–45.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Landercasper J, Greenberg CC, Chen SL. Quality measures and outcomes for breast cancer surgery. In: Bland KI, Copeland III EM, Klimberg VS, Gradishar, editors. The breast comprehensive management of benign and malignant diseases. 5th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018. p. 499–513. Landercasper J, Greenberg CC, Chen SL. Quality measures and outcomes for breast cancer surgery. In: Bland KI, Copeland III EM, Klimberg VS, Gradishar, editors. The breast comprehensive management of benign and malignant diseases. 5th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018. p. 499–513.
29.
go back to reference DeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Smith BD, et al. Assessment of practice patterns following publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3250–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeSnyder SM, Hunt KK, Smith BD, et al. Assessment of practice patterns following publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3250–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Landercasper J, Attai D, Atisha D, et al. Toolbox to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients: the American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3174–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Landercasper J, Attai D, Atisha D, et al. Toolbox to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients: the American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3174–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:503–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:503–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Jones V, Linebarger J, Perez S, et al. Excising additional margins at initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS) reduces the need for re-excision in a predominantly African American population: a report of a randomized prospective study in a public hospital. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):456–64.CrossRefPubMed Jones V, Linebarger J, Perez S, et al. Excising additional margins at initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS) reduces the need for re-excision in a predominantly African American population: a report of a randomized prospective study in a public hospital. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):456–64.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Eck DL, Koonce SL, Goldberg RF, et al. Breast surgery outcomes as quality measures according to the NSQIP database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3212–7.CrossRefPubMed Eck DL, Koonce SL, Goldberg RF, et al. Breast surgery outcomes as quality measures according to the NSQIP database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3212–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guideline on Rates of Re-excision After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Authors
Liska Havel, MD, MPH
Himani Naik, MPH
Luis Ramirez, MPH
Monica Morrow, MD
Jeffrey Landercasper, MD
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07247-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2019 Go to the issue