Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2018

01-12-2018 | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Careful Development and Thoughtful Interpretation are Needed when Developing Online Prognostic Tools

Author: Emily C. Zabor, MS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Historically, cancer staging systems have been used to stratify patients into risk groups with fixed ranges of predicted survival outcome. However, there is often significant heterogeneity in outcomes within a stage, and there can also be substantial overlap across stages. In response, the use of nomograms and other prognostic models to obtain patient-specific outcome predictions based on a collection of variables has been increasing in popularity. Often, the resulting prediction models will be made available online so that both patients and doctors have easy access. In melanoma, three different prediction models are available online and, depending on a patient’s disease characteristics, the resulting predictions can vary in clinically meaningful ways.13 This study aimed to critically assess the development and deployment of online prognostic tools through a demonstration of the differences in input variables and modeling procedures used in these three online melanoma prediction tools. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Soong SJ, Ding S, Coit D, et al. Predicting survival outcome of localized melanoma: an electronic prediction tool based on the AJCC Melanoma Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(8):2006–14.CrossRefPubMed Soong SJ, Ding S, Coit D, et al. Predicting survival outcome of localized melanoma: an electronic prediction tool based on the AJCC Melanoma Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(8):2006–14.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Callender GG, Gershenwald JE, Egger ME, et al. A novel and accurate computer model of melanoma prognosis for patients staged by sentinel lymph node biopsy: comparison with the American Joint Committee on Cancer model. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(4):608–617; discussion 617–609.CrossRefPubMed Callender GG, Gershenwald JE, Egger ME, et al. A novel and accurate computer model of melanoma prognosis for patients staged by sentinel lymph node biopsy: comparison with the American Joint Committee on Cancer model. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(4):608–617; discussion 617–609.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen LL, Nolan ME, Silverstein MJ, et al. The impact of primary tumor size, lymph node status, and other prognostic factors on the risk of cancer death. Cancer. 2009;115(21):5071–83.CrossRefPubMed Chen LL, Nolan ME, Silverstein MJ, et al. The impact of primary tumor size, lymph node status, and other prognostic factors on the risk of cancer death. Cancer. 2009;115(21):5071–83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zabor EC, Coit D, Gershenwald JE, McMasters KM, Michaelson JS, Stromberg AJ, et al. Variability in predictions from online tools: a demonstration using internet-based melanoma predictors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(8):2172–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zabor EC, Coit D, Gershenwald JE, McMasters KM, Michaelson JS, Stromberg AJ, et al. Variability in predictions from online tools: a demonstration using internet-based melanoma predictors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(8):2172–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kattan MW, Hess KR, Amin MB, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for inclusion of risk models for individualized prognosis in the practice of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(5):370–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kattan MW, Hess KR, Amin MB, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for inclusion of risk models for individualized prognosis in the practice of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(5):370–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Careful Development and Thoughtful Interpretation are Needed when Developing Online Prognostic Tools
Author
Emily C. Zabor, MS
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6987-3

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2018 Go to the issue