Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2018

01-12-2018 | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Towards Better Metrics for Judging Academic Productivity in Surgical Oncology

Authors: Vi Nguyen, BS, Jason K. Sicklick, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Research productivity is often used as a criterion in determining faculty recruitment, promotion, compensation, tenure, and grant support.1 To standardize assessment of scholars’ research output, Dr. Jorge Hirsch developed the h-index, defined as the number of h papers published, each of which has been cited at least h times.2 The h-index has been analyzed in the setting of various medical specialties, although not specifically within academic surgical oncology. Thus, the aim of our study was (1) to evaluate the h-index as a bibliometric predictor of academic rank; and (2) to characterize associations between the h-index and various personal and institutional factors, including gender, number of additional degrees, number of National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants, National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCI CCC) affiliation, and Doximity ranking.3
Literature
1.
go back to reference Valsangkar NP, Zimmers TA, Kim BJ, et al. Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery: an analysis of 3,850 faculty. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131678.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Valsangkar NP, Zimmers TA, Kim BJ, et al. Determining the drivers of academic success in surgery: an analysis of 3,850 faculty. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131678.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Nguyen V, Marmor RA, Ramamoorthy SL, Blair SL, Clary BM, Sicklick JK. Academic surgical oncologists’ productivity correlates with gender, grant funding, and institutional NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center affiliation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1852–1859.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nguyen V, Marmor RA, Ramamoorthy SL, Blair SL, Clary BM, Sicklick JK. Academic surgical oncologists’ productivity correlates with gender, grant funding, and institutional NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center affiliation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1852–1859.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Barnes C. The h-index debate: an introduction for librarians. J Acad Librariansh. 2017;43(6):487–94.CrossRef Barnes C. The h-index debate: an introduction for librarians. J Acad Librariansh. 2017;43(6):487–94.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rothstein MG, Davey LM. Gender differences in network relationships in academia. Women Manag Rev. 1995;10:20–5.CrossRef Rothstein MG, Davey LM. Gender differences in network relationships in academia. Women Manag Rev. 1995;10:20–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilcox AR, Wong SL. Changing the status quo, including how we measure it. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1801–2.CrossRefPubMed Wilcox AR, Wong SL. Changing the status quo, including how we measure it. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1801–2.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Towards Better Metrics for Judging Academic Productivity in Surgical Oncology
Authors
Vi Nguyen, BS
Jason K. Sicklick, MD
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6882-y

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2018 Go to the issue