Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018

01-12-2018 | Breast Oncology

Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients

Authors: Viviana Galimberti, MD, Consuelo Morigi, MD, Vincenzo Bagnardi, PhD, Giovanni Corso, MD, Elisa Vicini, MD, Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro Fontana, MD, Paola Naninato, MD, Silvia Ratini, MD, Francesca Magnoni, MD, Antonio Toesca, MD, Andriana Kouloura, MD, Mario Rietjens, MD, Francesca De Lorenzi, MD, Andrea Vingiani, MD, Paolo Veronesi, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly used in women with breast cancer who are not eligible for conservative surgery, but extensive outcome data are lacking and indications have not been established.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcomes of NSM in a large series of patients with invasive or in situ breast cancer treated at a single center.

Methods

We analyzed 1989 consecutive women who had an NSM in 2003–2011, for invasive (1711 patients) or in situ cancer (278 patients) at the European Institute of Oncology, Italy, and followed-up to December 2016. Endpoints were local recurrences, recurrences in the nipple-areola complex (NAC), NAC necrosis, and overall survival (OS).

Results

After a median follow-up of 94 months (interquartile range 70–117), 91/1711 (5.3%) patients with invasive cancer had local recurrence (4.8% invasive disease, 0.5% in situ disease), and 11/278 (4.0%) patients with in situ disease had local recurrence (1.8% invasive disease, 2.2% in situ disease). Thirty-six (1.8%) patients had NAC recurrence, 9 with in situ disease (4 invasive and 5 in situ recurrences), and 27 with invasive disease (18 invasive and 9 in situ recurrences). NAC loss for necrosis occurred in 66 (3.3%) patients. There were 131 (6.6%) deaths, 109 (5.5%) as a result of breast cancer. OS at 5 years was 96.1% in women with invasive cancer and 99.2% in women with in situ disease.

Conclusions

The findings in this large series, with a median follow-up of nearly 8 years, indicate that NSM is oncologically safe for selected patients. The rate of NAC loss was acceptably low.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Luini A, et al. Breast cancer: from “maximum tolerable” to “minimum effective” treatment. Front Oncol. 2012;2:125.PubMedPubMedCentral Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Luini A, et al. Breast cancer: from “maximum tolerable” to “minimum effective” treatment. Front Oncol. 2012;2:125.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, et al. Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast. 2007;16:387–95.CrossRef Rietjens M, Urban CA, Rey PC, et al. Long-term oncological results of breast conservative treatment with oncoplastic surgery. Breast. 2007;16:387–95.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63.CrossRef Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins DR Jr, et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:457–63.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN, et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J. 2016;22:10–7.CrossRef Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN, et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J. 2016;22:10–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.CrossRef Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–33.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:591–95.CrossRef Zhong T, Antony A, Cordeiro P. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:591–95.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Simmons RM, Adamovich TL. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:885–99.CrossRef Simmons RM, Adamovich TL. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:885–99.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, et al. Patient satisfaction and nipple-areola sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate implant breast reconstruction in a high breast cancer risk population: NSM versus SSM. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:145–52.CrossRef Van Verschuer VM, Mureau MA, Gopie JP, et al. Patient satisfaction and nipple-areola sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate implant breast reconstruction in a high breast cancer risk population: NSM versus SSM. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77:145–52.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRef Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sisco M, Yao KA. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: a contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:883–90.CrossRef Sisco M, Yao KA. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: a contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:883–90.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y, et al. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1521–27.CrossRef Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y, et al. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1521–27.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, et al. An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:156–64.CrossRef Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, et al. An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:156–64.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:905–9.CrossRef Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:905–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fortunato L, Loreti A, Andrich R, et al. When mastectomy is needed: is the nipple-sparing procedure a new standard with very few contraindications? J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:207–12.CrossRef Fortunato L, Loreti A, Andrich R, et al. When mastectomy is needed: is the nipple-sparing procedure a new standard with very few contraindications? J Surg Oncol. 2013;108:207–12.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Özkurt E, Tükenmez M, Güven E, et al. Favorable outcome with close margins in patients undergoing nipple/skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: 5-year follow-up. Balkan Med J. 2018;35:84–92.CrossRef Özkurt E, Tükenmez M, Güven E, et al. Favorable outcome with close margins in patients undergoing nipple/skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: 5-year follow-up. Balkan Med J. 2018;35:84–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Orecchia R, Veronesi U. Intraoperative electrons. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:76–83.CrossRef Orecchia R, Veronesi U. Intraoperative electrons. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:76–83.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Gatti G, Luini A, et al. Intraoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer: technical notes. Breast J. 2003;9:106–12.CrossRef Veronesi U, Gatti G, Luini A, et al. Intraoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer: technical notes. Breast J. 2003;9:106–12.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gorai K, Inoue K, Saegusa N, et al. Prediction of skin necrosis after mastectomy for breast cancer using indocyanine green angiography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(4):e1321.CrossRef Gorai K, Inoue K, Saegusa N, et al. Prediction of skin necrosis after mastectomy for breast cancer using indocyanine green angiography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(4):e1321.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference De Lorenzi F, Yamaguchi S, Petit JY, et al. Evaluation of skin perfusion after nipple-sparing mastectomy by indocyanine green dye. Preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005;24(3):347–54.PubMed De Lorenzi F, Yamaguchi S, Petit JY, et al. Evaluation of skin perfusion after nipple-sparing mastectomy by indocyanine green dye. Preliminary results. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005;24(3):347–54.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley; 1980. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley; 1980.
22.
go back to reference Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;6:1141–54.CrossRef Gray RJ. A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;6:1141–54.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Altman DG, De Stavola BL, Love SB, et al. Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals. Br J Cancer. 1995;72:511–18.CrossRef Altman DG, De Stavola BL, Love SB, et al. Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals. Br J Cancer. 1995;72:511–18.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shimo A, Tsugawa K, Tsuchiya S, et al. Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:851–860.CrossRef Shimo A, Tsugawa K, Tsuchiya S, et al. Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:851–860.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:686–93.CrossRef Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:686–93.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, et al. Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol. 2013;30:481.CrossRef Sakurai T, Zhang N, Suzuma T, et al. Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution. Med Oncol. 2013;30:481.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Laurberg T, Tramm T, Nielsen T, et al. Intrinsic subtypes and benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy in node-positive premenopausal breast cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy: results from two independent randomized trials. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:38–43.CrossRef Laurberg T, Tramm T, Nielsen T, et al. Intrinsic subtypes and benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy in node-positive premenopausal breast cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy: results from two independent randomized trials. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:38–43.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lai SF, Chen YH, Kuo WH, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk for postmastectomy breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive lymph nodes receiving modern systemic treatment without radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3860–69.CrossRef Lai SF, Chen YH, Kuo WH, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk for postmastectomy breast cancer patients with T1-2 and one to three positive lymph nodes receiving modern systemic treatment without radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3860–69.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Scheer AS, Zih FS, Maki E, et al. Post-mastectomy radiation: should subtype factor into the decision? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2462–70.CrossRef Scheer AS, Zih FS, Maki E, et al. Post-mastectomy radiation: should subtype factor into the decision? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2462–70.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Dominici LS, Mittendorf EA, Wang X, et al. Implications of constructed biologic subtype and its relationship to locoregional recurrence following mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R82.CrossRef Dominici LS, Mittendorf EA, Wang X, et al. Implications of constructed biologic subtype and its relationship to locoregional recurrence following mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R82.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Headon HL, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with a pooled analysis of 12,358 procedures. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43:328–38.CrossRef Headon HL, Kasem A, Mokbel K. The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with a pooled analysis of 12,358 procedures. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43:328–38.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, et al. Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:990–6.CrossRef Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E, et al. Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:990–6.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.CrossRef Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249:26–32.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Setälä L, Papp A, Joukainen S, et al. Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:195–99.CrossRef Setälä L, Papp A, Joukainen S, et al. Obesity and complications in breast reduction surgery: are restrictions justified? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:195–99.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference O’Grady KF, Thoma A, Dal Cin A. A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:736–42.CrossRef O’Grady KF, Thoma A, Dal Cin A. A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:736–42.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, et al. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3241–49.CrossRef De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, et al. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3241–49.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235:814–19.CrossRef Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235:814–19.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Crowe JP Jr, Gordon NH, Antunez AR, et al. Local-regional breast cancer recurrence following mastectomy. Arch Surg. 1991;126:429–32.CrossRef Crowe JP Jr, Gordon NH, Antunez AR, et al. Local-regional breast cancer recurrence following mastectomy. Arch Surg. 1991;126:429–32.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Tokin C, Weiss A, Wang-Rodriguez J, et al. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:921821.PubMedPubMedCentral Tokin C, Weiss A, Wang-Rodriguez J, et al. Oncologic safety of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a discussion and review of the literature. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:921821.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients
Authors
Viviana Galimberti, MD
Consuelo Morigi, MD
Vincenzo Bagnardi, PhD
Giovanni Corso, MD
Elisa Vicini, MD
Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro Fontana, MD
Paola Naninato, MD
Silvia Ratini, MD
Francesca Magnoni, MD
Antonio Toesca, MD
Andriana Kouloura, MD
Mario Rietjens, MD
Francesca De Lorenzi, MD
Andrea Vingiani, MD
Paolo Veronesi, MD
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6759-0

Other articles of this Issue 13/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2018 Go to the issue