Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Breast Oncology

A National Study of the Use of Asymptomatic Systemic Imaging for Surveillance Following Breast Cancer Treatment (AFT-01)

Authors: Jessica R. Schumacher, PhD, Heather B. Neuman, MD, MS, George J. Chang, MD, MS, Benjamin D. Kozower, MD, MPH, Stephen B. Edge, MD, Menggang Yu, PhD, David J. Vanness, PhD, Yajuan Si, PhD, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, MD, MAPP, Amanda B. Francescatti, MS, Patricia A. Spears, BS, Jeffrey Havlena, MS, Taiwo Adesoye, MD, MPH, Daniel McKellar, MD, David Winchester, MD, Elizabeth S. Burnside, MD, MPH, MS, Caprice C. Greenberg, MD, MPH, the Alliance ACS-CRP CCDR Breast Cancer Surveillance Working Group

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although not guideline recommended, studies suggest 50% of locoregional breast cancer patients undergo systemic imaging during follow-up, prompting its inclusion as a Choosing Wisely measure of potential overuse. Most studies rely on administrative data that cannot delineate scan intent (prompted by signs/symptoms vs. asymptomatic surveillance). This is a critical gap as intent is the only way to distinguish overuse from appropriate care.

Objective

Our aim was to assess surveillance systemic imaging post-breast cancer treatment in a national sample accounting for scan intent.

Methods

A stage-stratified random sample of 10 women with stage II–III breast cancer in 2006–2007 was selected from each of 1217 Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities, for a total of 10,838 patients. Registrars abstracted scan type (computed tomography [CT], non-breast magnetic resonance imaging, bone scan, positron emission tomography/CT) and intent (cancer-related vs. not, asymptomatic surveillance vs. not) from medical records for 5 years post-diagnosis. Data were merged with each patient’s corresponding National Cancer Database record, containing sociodemographic and tumor/treatment information.

Results

Of 10,838 women, 30% had one or more, and 12% had two or more, systemic surveillance scans during a 4-year follow-up period. Patients were more likely to receive surveillance imaging in the first follow-up year (lower proportions during subsequent years) and if they had estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative tumors.

Conclusions

Locoregional breast cancer patients undergo asymptomatic systemic imaging during follow-up despite guidelines recommending against it, but at lower rates than previously reported. Providers appear to use factors that confer increased recurrence risk to tailor decisions about systemic surveillance imaging, perhaps reflecting limitations of data on which current guidelines are based.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02171078.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014. Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014.
2.
go back to reference Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(7):961–65.CrossRefPubMed Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(7):961–65.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):5091–97.CrossRefPubMed Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):5091–97.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Hodgson DC, Del Giudice ME, et al. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(4):174–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grunfeld E, Hodgson DC, Del Giudice ME, et al. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(4):174–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Panageas KS, Sima CS, Liberman L, et al. Use of high technology imaging for surveillance of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(2):663–70.CrossRefPubMed Panageas KS, Sima CS, Liberman L, et al. Use of high technology imaging for surveillance of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(2):663–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hahn EE, Hays RD, Kahn KL, et al. Use of imaging and biomarker tests for posttreatment care of early-stage breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(24):4316–24.CrossRefPubMed Hahn EE, Hays RD, Kahn KL, et al. Use of imaging and biomarker tests for posttreatment care of early-stage breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2013;119(24):4316–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Geurts SM, de Vegt F, Siesling S, et al. Pattern of follow-up care and early relapse detection in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(3):859-868.CrossRefPubMed Geurts SM, de Vegt F, Siesling S, et al. Pattern of follow-up care and early relapse detection in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(3):859-868.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.CrossRefPubMed Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Williams RT, Stewart AK, Winchester DP. Monitoring the delivery of cancer care: Commission on Cancer and National Cancer Data Base. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(3):377–88. Williams RT, Stewart AK, Winchester DP. Monitoring the delivery of cancer care: Commission on Cancer and National Cancer Data Base. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(3):377–88.
15.
go back to reference Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Bura C, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: A clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol. 2004;85(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Bura C, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: A clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool. J Surg Oncol. 2004;85(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Commission on Cancer. Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards. Chicago, IL: Commission on Cancer; 2013. Commission on Cancer. Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards. Chicago, IL: Commission on Cancer; 2013.
17.
go back to reference In H, Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, et al. Cancer recurrence: an important but missing variable in national cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(5):1520–29.CrossRefPubMed In H, Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, et al. Cancer recurrence: an important but missing variable in national cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(5):1520–29.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cossetti RJ, Tyldesley SK, Speers CH, et al. Comparison of breast cancer recurrence and outcome patterns between patients treated from 1986 to 1992 and from 2004 to 2008. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):65–73.CrossRefPubMed Cossetti RJ, Tyldesley SK, Speers CH, et al. Comparison of breast cancer recurrence and outcome patterns between patients treated from 1986 to 1992 and from 2004 to 2008. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):65–73.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–31. Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–31.
20.
go back to reference Hahn EE, Tang T, Lee JS, et al. Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: inappropriate surveillance or necessary care? Cancer. 2016;122(6):908–16.CrossRefPubMed Hahn EE, Tang T, Lee JS, et al. Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: inappropriate surveillance or necessary care? Cancer. 2016;122(6):908–16.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference 21. Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(9):927–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral 21. Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN, et al. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(9):927–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine—Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine—Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
23.
go back to reference Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, et al. Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1586–86.CrossRefPubMed Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, et al. Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(17):1586–86.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ghezzi P, Magnanini S, Rinaldini M, et al. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality-of-life in breast-cancer patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1587–92.CrossRef Ghezzi P, Magnanini S, Rinaldini M, et al. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality-of-life in breast-cancer patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1587–92.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Delturco MR, Palli D, Cariddi A, et al. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast-cancer—a randomized trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1593–97.CrossRef Delturco MR, Palli D, Cariddi A, et al. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast-cancer—a randomized trial. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1593–97.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference 26. Liberati A. The GIVIO trial on the impact of follow-up care on survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:41–46.CrossRefPubMed 26. Liberati A. The GIVIO trial on the impact of follow-up care on survival and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:41–46.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, et al. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD001768. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, et al. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD001768.
Metadata
Title
A National Study of the Use of Asymptomatic Systemic Imaging for Surveillance Following Breast Cancer Treatment (AFT-01)
Authors
Jessica R. Schumacher, PhD
Heather B. Neuman, MD, MS
George J. Chang, MD, MS
Benjamin D. Kozower, MD, MPH
Stephen B. Edge, MD
Menggang Yu, PhD
David J. Vanness, PhD
Yajuan Si, PhD
Elizabeth A. Jacobs, MD, MAPP
Amanda B. Francescatti, MS
Patricia A. Spears, BS
Jeffrey Havlena, MS
Taiwo Adesoye, MD, MPH
Daniel McKellar, MD
David Winchester, MD
Elizabeth S. Burnside, MD, MPH, MS
Caprice C. Greenberg, MD, MPH
the Alliance ACS-CRP CCDR Breast Cancer Surveillance Working Group
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6496-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2018 Go to the issue