Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Comparative Performance of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities

Authors: Sarah B. Fisher, MD, Yi-Ju Chiang, MSPH, Barry W. Feig, MD, Janice N. Cormier, MD, MPH, Kelly K. Hunt, MD, Keila E. Torres, MD, Christina L. Roland, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for soft tissue sarcomas of the trunk/extremities divides T stage into four categories and upstages nodal disease to stage IV. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the prognostic power of the new system.

Methods

A total of 26,144 patients were identified from the NCDB from 2004 to 2013. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Including T3 (10 cm > × >15 cm) and T4 (> 15 cm) categories resulted in an increased number of patients classified as stage III (5120 as IIIA [19.6%] and 4280 as IIIB [16.4%], vs. 7882 [30.1%] previously), and there was a small increase in the number of patients classified as stage IV (2776 [10.6%], vs. 2565 [9.8%] previously). In the 7th edition, the hazard ratio (HR) for death increases with stage, with large incremental increases between stages II–III and III–IV. In the 8th edition, the HR for death demonstrates smaller incremental increases between each stage. Five-year OS for 7th edition T1 and T2 patients was 78.8 and 58.8% (p < 0.01), respectively, versus 62.6, 53.5, and 56.1% for T2, T3, and T4 patients, respectively, in the 8th edition (p < 0.01). Patients with isolated nodal disease (n = 211) had a better 5-year OS than those with distant metastases (33.1% vs. 12.4%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The AJCC 8th edition uses T stage to more accurately stratify OS in patients with large, high-grade tumors (T3/4) compared with those patients with T2 tumors, which facilitates risk assessment. The distinction between T3 and T4 may not be clinically significant. Patients with metastatic nodal disease have a survival outcome intermediate to those with stages III and IV disease.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Mohanty S, Bilimoria KY. Comparing national cancer registries: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Journal of surgical oncology. 2014;109(7):629–30CrossRefPubMed Mohanty S, Bilimoria KY. Comparing national cancer registries: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Journal of surgical oncology. 2014;109(7):629–30CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition. Springer, Berlin; 2017 AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition. Springer, Berlin; 2017
5.
go back to reference Maki RG, Moraco N, Antonescu CR, et al. Toward better soft tissue sarcoma staging: building on american joint committee on cancer staging systems versions 6 and 7. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3377–83CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maki RG, Moraco N, Antonescu CR, et al. Toward better soft tissue sarcoma staging: building on american joint committee on cancer staging systems versions 6 and 7. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3377–83CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Lahat G, Tuvin D, Wei C, et al. New perspectives for staging and prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma. Ann surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2739–48CrossRefPubMed Lahat G, Tuvin D, Wei C, et al. New perspectives for staging and prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma. Ann surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2739–48CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Al-Refaie WB, Andtbacka RHI, Ensor J, et al. Lymphadenectomy for isolated lymph node metastasis from extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer. 2008;112(8):1821–26CrossRefPubMed Al-Refaie WB, Andtbacka RHI, Ensor J, et al. Lymphadenectomy for isolated lymph node metastasis from extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer. 2008;112(8):1821–26CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Voss RK, Chiang YJ, Torres KE, et al. Adherence to National comprehensive cancer network guidelines is associated with improved survival for patients with stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(11):3271–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Voss RK, Chiang YJ, Torres KE, et al. Adherence to National comprehensive cancer network guidelines is associated with improved survival for patients with stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(11):3271–78CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Atalay C, Altinok M, Seref B. The impact of lymph node metastases on survival in extremity soft tissue sarcomas. World J Surg. 2007;31(7):1433–37CrossRefPubMed Atalay C, Altinok M, Seref B. The impact of lymph node metastases on survival in extremity soft tissue sarcomas. World J Surg. 2007;31(7):1433–37CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Johannesmeyer D, Smith V, Cole DJ, Esnaola NF, Camp ER. The impact of lymph node disease in extremity soft-tissue sarcomas: a population-based analysis. Am J Surg. 2013;206(3):289–295CrossRefPubMed Johannesmeyer D, Smith V, Cole DJ, Esnaola NF, Camp ER. The impact of lymph node disease in extremity soft-tissue sarcomas: a population-based analysis. Am J Surg. 2013;206(3):289–295CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sawamura C, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, Ae K, Okawa A. Lymphadenectomy and histologic subtype affect overall survival of soft tissue sarcoma patients with nodal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):926–931.CrossRefPubMed Sawamura C, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, Ae K, Okawa A. Lymphadenectomy and histologic subtype affect overall survival of soft tissue sarcoma patients with nodal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):926–931.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sherman KL, Kinnier CV, Farina DA, et al. Examination of national lymph node evaluation practices for adult extremity soft tissue sarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(6):682–688CrossRefPubMed Sherman KL, Kinnier CV, Farina DA, et al. Examination of national lymph node evaluation practices for adult extremity soft tissue sarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(6):682–688CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Keung EZ, Chiang Y, Voss R, et al. Defining the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(1):170–177.CrossRefPubMed Keung EZ, Chiang Y, Voss R, et al. Defining the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(1):170–177.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Behranwala KA, A’Hern R, Omar AM, Thomas JM. Prognosis of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(7):714–719CrossRefPubMed Behranwala KA, A’Hern R, Omar AM, Thomas JM. Prognosis of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(7):714–719CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Riad S, Griffin AM, Liberman B, et al. Lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity. Clin orthop Relat Res. 2004;(426):129–134CrossRef Riad S, Griffin AM, Liberman B, et al. Lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity. Clin orthop Relat Res. 2004;(426):129–134CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Guillou L, Coindre JM, Bonichon F, et al. Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(1):350–362CrossRefPubMed Guillou L, Coindre JM, Bonichon F, et al. Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(1):350–362CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pisters PW, Leung DH, Woodruff J, Shi W, Brennan MF. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(5):1679–1689CrossRefPubMed Pisters PW, Leung DH, Woodruff J, Shi W, Brennan MF. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(5):1679–1689CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dalal KM, Kattan MW, Antonescu CR, Brennan MF, Singer S. Subtype specific prognostic nomogram for patients with primary liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum, extremity, or trunk. Ann Surg. 2006;244(3):381–391PubMedPubMedCentral Dalal KM, Kattan MW, Antonescu CR, Brennan MF, Singer S. Subtype specific prognostic nomogram for patients with primary liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum, extremity, or trunk. Ann Surg. 2006;244(3):381–391PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Kattan MW, Leung DH, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for 12-year sarcoma-specific death. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(3):791–796CrossRefPubMed Kattan MW, Leung DH, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for 12-year sarcoma-specific death. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(3):791–796CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mariani L, Miceli R, Kattan MW, et al. Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system. Cancer. 2005;103(2):402–408CrossRefPubMed Mariani L, Miceli R, Kattan MW, et al. Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system. Cancer. 2005;103(2):402–408CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Corey RM, Swett K, Ward WG. Epidemiology and survivorship of soft tissue sarcomas in adults: a national cancer database report. Cancer Med. 2014;3(5):1404–1415CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Corey RM, Swett K, Ward WG. Epidemiology and survivorship of soft tissue sarcomas in adults: a national cancer database report. Cancer Med. 2014;3(5):1404–1415CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Arbiser ZK, Folpe AL, Weiss SW. Consultative (expert) second opinions in soft tissue pathology. Analysis of problem-prone diagnostic situations. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(4):473–476CrossRefPubMed Arbiser ZK, Folpe AL, Weiss SW. Consultative (expert) second opinions in soft tissue pathology. Analysis of problem-prone diagnostic situations. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(4):473–476CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative Performance of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities
Authors
Sarah B. Fisher, MD
Yi-Ju Chiang, MSPH
Barry W. Feig, MD
Janice N. Cormier, MD, MPH
Kelly K. Hunt, MD
Keila E. Torres, MD
Christina L. Roland, MD
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6378-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2018 Go to the issue