Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Pancreatic Tumors

Chemotherapy with or Without Definitive Radiation Therapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer

Authors: Jim Zhong, MD, Jeffrey Switchenko, PhD, Madhusmita Behera, PhD, David Kooby, MD, Shishir K. Maithel, MD, Mark W. McDonald, MD, Jolinta Y. Lin, MD, Richard J. Cassidy, MD, Bassel El-Rayes, MD, Jerome Landry, MD, Pretesh R. Patel, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The LAP07 randomized trial calls into question the role of radiation therapy (RT) in the modern treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, advances in chemotherapy and RT limit application of the LAP07 results to current clinical practice. Here we utilize the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the effects of RT in patients receiving chemotherapy for LAPC.

Methods

Using the NCDB, patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage T2–4, N0–1, M0 adenocarcinoma of the pancreas from 2004 to 2014 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into chemotherapy only (CT) and chemoradiation (CRT) cohorts. Patients undergoing definitive RT, defined as at least 20 fractions or ≥ 5 Gy per fraction [i.e., stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)] were included in the CRT cohort. Propensity-score matching (PSM) and landmark analysis were used to address selection bias and lead-time bias, respectively.

Results

13,004 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 7034 (54%) received CT and 5970 (46%) received CRT. After PSM, 5215 patients remained in each cohort. The CRT cohort demonstrated better overall survival (OS) compared with CT alone, with median and 1-year OS of 12 versus 10 months, and 50% and 41%, respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, CRT was associated with superior OS with hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.83) compared with CT alone.

Conclusions

In our series, addition of definitive radiotherapy to CT was associated with better OS when compared with CT alone in LAPC. Definitive radiotherapy should remain a treatment option for LAPC, but optimal selection criteria remain unclear.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;221(6):721–731 (discussion 731–723).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;221(6):721–731 (discussion 731–723).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Gillespie TW, Liu Y, et al. Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival after pancreatic cancer resection: an appraisal of data from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3634–3642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kooby DA, Gillespie TW, Liu Y, et al. Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival after pancreatic cancer resection: an appraisal of data from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(11):3634–3642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Comparative therapeutic trial of radiation with or without chemotherapy in pancreatic carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5(9):1643–1647.CrossRef Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Comparative therapeutic trial of radiation with or without chemotherapy in pancreatic carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5(9):1643–1647.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Treatment of locally unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas: comparison of combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) to chemotherapy alone. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(10):751–755.CrossRef Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Treatment of locally unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas: comparison of combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) to chemotherapy alone. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(10):751–755.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL, et al. Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(17):1844–1853.CrossRefPubMed Hammel P, Huguet F, van Laethem JL, et al. Effect of chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: the LAP07 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(17):1844–1853.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–1825.CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–1825.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691–1703.CrossRef Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691–1703.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shaib WL, Hawk N, Cassidy RJ, et al. A phase 1 study of stereotactic body radiation therapy dose escalation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after modified FOLFIRINOX (NCT01446458). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(2):296–303.CrossRefPubMed Shaib WL, Hawk N, Cassidy RJ, et al. A phase 1 study of stereotactic body radiation therapy dose escalation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after modified FOLFIRINOX (NCT01446458). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(2):296–303.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mahadevan A, Jain S, Goldstein M, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy and gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(3):735–742.CrossRefPubMed Mahadevan A, Jain S, Goldstein M, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy and gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(3):735–742.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Herman JM, Chang DT, Goodman KA, et al. Phase 2 multi-institutional trial evaluating gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121(7):1128–137.CrossRefPubMed Herman JM, Chang DT, Goodman KA, et al. Phase 2 multi-institutional trial evaluating gemcitabine and stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121(7):1128–137.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chang DT, Schellenberg D, Shen J, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer. 2009;115(3):665–672.CrossRefPubMed Chang DT, Schellenberg D, Shen J, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer. 2009;115(3):665–672.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhong J, Patel K, Switchenko J, et al. Outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation. Cancer. 2017;123(18):3486–3493.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhong J, Patel K, Switchenko J, et al. Outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation. Cancer. 2017;123(18):3486–3493.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Menck HR, Cunningham MP, Jessup JM, et al. The growth and maturation of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 1997;80(12):2296–2304.CrossRefPubMed Menck HR, Cunningham MP, Jessup JM, et al. The growth and maturation of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 1997;80(12):2296–2304.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Partridge EE. The National Cancer Data Base: ten years of growth and commitment. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48(3):131–133.CrossRefPubMed Partridge EE. The National Cancer Data Base: ten years of growth and commitment. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48(3):131–133.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(6):567–579.CrossRefPubMed Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(6):567–579.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nickleach D LY, Shrewsberry A, Ogan K, Kim S, Wang SAS® Macros to Conduct Common Biostatistical Analyses and Generate Reports. In: SESUG 2013: The Proceeding of the SouthEast SAS User Group. 2013. Nickleach D LY, Shrewsberry A, Ogan K, Kim S, Wang SAS® Macros to Conduct Common Biostatistical Analyses and Generate Reports. In: SESUG 2013: The Proceeding of the SouthEast SAS User Group. 2013.
19.
go back to reference Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2007;26(4):734–753.CrossRefPubMed Austin PC, Grootendorst P, Anderson GM. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2007;26(4):734–753.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lin DY WL. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc.1989;84(408):1074–1078.CrossRef Lin DY WL. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc.1989;84(408):1074–1078.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Loehrer PJ, Sr., Feng Y, Cardenes H, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(31):4105–4112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Loehrer PJ, Sr., Feng Y, Cardenes H, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(31):4105–4112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(9):1592–1599.CrossRefPubMed Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(9):1592–1599.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Chemotherapy with or Without Definitive Radiation Therapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer
Authors
Jim Zhong, MD
Jeffrey Switchenko, PhD
Madhusmita Behera, PhD
David Kooby, MD
Shishir K. Maithel, MD
Mark W. McDonald, MD
Jolinta Y. Lin, MD
Richard J. Cassidy, MD
Bassel El-Rayes, MD
Jerome Landry, MD
Pretesh R. Patel, MD
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6322-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2018 Go to the issue