Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Association of Delivery System Integration and Outcomes for Major Cancer Surgery

Authors: Jonathan Li, BSE, Zaojun Ye, MS, James M. Dupree, MD, MPH, Brent K. Hollenbeck, MD, MS, Hye Sung Min, MS, Deborah Kaye, MD, Lindsey A. Herrel, MD, MS, David C. Miller, MD, MPH, Chad Ellimoottil, MD, MS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Integrated delivery systems (IDSs) are postulated to reduce spending and improve outcomes through successful coordination of care across multiple providers. Nonetheless, the actual impact of IDSs on outcomes for complex multidisciplinary care such as major cancer surgery is largely unknown.

Methods

Using 2011–2013 Medicare data, this study identified patients who underwent surgical resection for prostate, bladder, esophageal, pancreatic, lung, liver, kidney, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. Rates of readmission, 30-day mortality, surgical complications, failure to rescue, and prolonged hospital stay for cancer surgery were compared between patients receiving care at IDS hospitals and those receiving care at non-IDS hospitals. Generalized estimating equations were used to adjust results by cancer type and patient- and hospital-level characteristics while accounting for clustering of patients within hospitals.

Results

The study identified 380,053 patients who underwent major resection of cancer, with 38% receiving care at an IDS. Outcomes did not differ between IDS and non-IDS hospitals regarding readmission and surgical complication rates, whereas only minor differences were observed for 30-day mortality (3.5% vs 3.2% for IDS; p < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stay (9.9% vs 9.2% for IDS; p < 0.001). However, after adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics, the frequencies of adverse perioperative outcomes were not significantly associated with IDS status.

Conclusions

The collective findings suggest that local delivery system integration alone does not necessarily have an impact on perioperative outcomes in surgical oncology. Moving forward, stakeholders may need to focus on surgical and oncology-specific methods of care coordination and quality improvement initiatives to improve outcomes for patients undergoing cancer surgery.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Hwang W, Chang J, Laclair M, Paz H. Effects of integrated delivery system on cost and quality. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:e175–84.PubMed Hwang W, Chang J, Laclair M, Paz H. Effects of integrated delivery system on cost and quality. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:e175–84.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Karash JA, Larson L. Clinical integration managing across the care continuum. Hosp Health Netw. 2016;90:26–31.PubMed Karash JA, Larson L. Clinical integration managing across the care continuum. Hosp Health Netw. 2016;90:26–31.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Enthoven AC. Integrated delivery systems: the cure for fragmentation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(10 Suppl):S284–90.PubMed Enthoven AC. Integrated delivery systems: the cure for fragmentation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(10 Suppl):S284–90.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Solberg LI, Asche SE, Shortell SM, et al. Is integration in large medical groups associated with quality? Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:e34–41.PubMed Solberg LI, Asche SE, Shortell SM, et al. Is integration in large medical groups associated with quality? Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:e34–41.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mehrotra A, Epstein AM, Rosenthal MB. Do integrated medical groups provide higher-quality medical care than individual practice associations? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:826–33.CrossRefPubMed Mehrotra A, Epstein AM, Rosenthal MB. Do integrated medical groups provide higher-quality medical care than individual practice associations? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:826–33.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Newhouse RP, Mills ME, Johantgen M, Pronovost PJ. Is there a relationship between service integration and differentiation and patient outcomes? Int J Integr Care. 2003;3:e15.PubMedPubMedCentral Newhouse RP, Mills ME, Johantgen M, Pronovost PJ. Is there a relationship between service integration and differentiation and patient outcomes? Int J Integr Care. 2003;3:e15.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Hollenbeck BK, Bierlein MJ, Kaufman SR, et al. Implications of evolving delivery system reforms for prostate cancer care. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22:569–75.PubMedPubMedCentral Hollenbeck BK, Bierlein MJ, Kaufman SR, et al. Implications of evolving delivery system reforms for prostate cancer care. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22:569–75.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Iezzoni LI, Mackiernan YD, Cahalane MJ, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Miller K. Screening inpatient quality using post-discharge events. Med Care. 1999;37:384–98.CrossRefPubMed Iezzoni LI, Mackiernan YD, Cahalane MJ, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Miller K. Screening inpatient quality using post-discharge events. Med Care. 1999;37:384–98.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.CrossRefPubMed Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Jung H-Y, Trivedi AN, Grabowski DC, Mor V. Integrated medicare and medicaid managed care and rehospitalization of dual eligibles. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21:711–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Jung H-Y, Trivedi AN, Grabowski DC, Mor V. Integrated medicare and medicaid managed care and rehospitalization of dual eligibles. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21:711–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Association of Delivery System Integration and Outcomes for Major Cancer Surgery
Authors
Jonathan Li, BSE
Zaojun Ye, MS
James M. Dupree, MD, MPH
Brent K. Hollenbeck, MD, MS
Hye Sung Min, MS
Deborah Kaye, MD
Lindsey A. Herrel, MD, MS
David C. Miller, MD, MPH
Chad Ellimoottil, MD, MS
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6312-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2018 Go to the issue