Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Urologic Oncology

Preoperative Measurement of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Patient Survival in Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to Nephrectomy

Authors: Takuya Tsujino, MD, Kazumasa Komura, MD, Tomohisa Matsunaga, MD, Yuki Yoshikawa, MD, Tomoaki Takai, MD, Taizo Uchimoto, MD, Kenkichi Saito, MD, Naoki Tanda, MD, Rintaro Oide, BS, Koichiro Minami, MD, Hirofumi Uehara, MD, Seong Ho Jeong, BS, Kohei Taniguchi, MD, PhD, Hajime Hirano, MD, PhD, Hayahito Nomi, MD, PhD, Naokazu Ibuki, MD, PhD, Kiyoshi Takahara, MD, PhD, Teruo Inamoto, MD, PhD, Haruhito Azuma, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) by measurement of serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels has been shown to provide prognostic value in various cancer types. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative assessment of the mGPS predicts patient survival outcome in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Materials and Methods

Clinicopathological and follow-up data in 219 RCC patients, all of whom underwent curative or non-curative nephrectomy, were collected. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after nephrectomy were evaluated, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the predictive value of the variables, including the mGPS.

Results

During the median follow-up of 57 months, 53 patients (24.2%) were deceased within 22 months of the median OS. The 5-year OS rate from nephrectomy was 85.9 and 18.8% in non-metastatic (n = 195) and metastatic (n = 24) patients, respectively. Increasing mGPS was associated with shorter OS in non-metastatic patients (2-year OS rate of 98.2% in mGPS0, 73.3% in mGPS1, and 44.4% in mGPS2; hazard ratio [HR] 9.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.88–20.13, p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference in OS according to the mGPS was seen in metastatic patients (HR 2.01, 95% CI 0.79–5.16, p = 0.137). On multivariate analysis, the mGPS remained as an independent predictor for OS (HR 5.24, 95% CI 1.39–19.77, p = 0.015) and CSS (HR 4.69, 95% CI 1.13–20.96, p = 0.034) in non-metastatic RCC patients.

Conclusions

The mGPS appeared to be a reliable, preoperatively defined predictive marker with widely standardized protocol in non-metastatic RCC, and should therefore be considered in treatment decision making for RCC patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Komura K, Inamoto T, Black PC, et al. Prognostic significance of body mass index in Asian patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Nutr Cancer. 2011;63:908–15.CrossRefPubMed Komura K, Inamoto T, Black PC, et al. Prognostic significance of body mass index in Asian patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Nutr Cancer. 2011;63:908–15.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fearon KC. Cancer cachexia: developing multimodal therapy for a multidimensional problem. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1124–32.CrossRefPubMed Fearon KC. Cancer cachexia: developing multimodal therapy for a multidimensional problem. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1124–32.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS. Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:215–9.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS. Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:215–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1028–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1028–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:881–6.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:881–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference McMillan DC. An inflammation-based prognostic score and its role in the nutrition-based management of patients with cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:257–62.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC. An inflammation-based prognostic score and its role in the nutrition-based management of patients with cancer. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:257–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McMillan DC. The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:534–40.CrossRefPubMed McMillan DC. The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39:534–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:205–12.CrossRefPubMed Ramsey S, Lamb GW, Aitchison M, et al. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with metastatic renal cancer. Cancer. 2007;109:205–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Karam JA, Devine CE, Urbauer DL, et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant axitinib in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014;66:874–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karam JA, Devine CE, Urbauer DL, et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant axitinib in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2014;66:874–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Powles T, Sarwar N, Stockdale A, et al. Safety and efficacy of pazopanib therapy prior to planned nephrectomy in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1303–9.CrossRefPubMed Powles T, Sarwar N, Stockdale A, et al. Safety and efficacy of pazopanib therapy prior to planned nephrectomy in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1303–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rini BI, Plimack ER, Takagi T, et al. A phase ii study of pazopanib in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma to optimize preservation of renal parenchyma. J Urol. 2015;194:297–303.CrossRefPubMed Rini BI, Plimack ER, Takagi T, et al. A phase ii study of pazopanib in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma to optimize preservation of renal parenchyma. J Urol. 2015;194:297–303.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lane BR, Derweesh IH, Kim HL, et al. Presurgical sunitinib reduces tumor size and may facilitate partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:112.e15–21.e15.CrossRefPubMed Lane BR, Derweesh IH, Kim HL, et al. Presurgical sunitinib reduces tumor size and may facilitate partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:112.e15–21.e15.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655–63.CrossRefPubMed Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655–63.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F, et al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1649–57.CrossRefPubMed Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F, et al. Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1649–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol. 2002;168:2395–400.CrossRefPubMed Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J Urol. 2002;168:2395–400.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stafford HS, Saltzstein SL, Shimasaki S, et al. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival. J Urol. 2008;179:1704–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stafford HS, Saltzstein SL, Shimasaki S, et al. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival. J Urol. 2008;179:1704–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Naito S, Yamamoto N, Takayama T, et al. Prognosis of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the cytokine era: a cooperative group report of 1463 patients. Eur Urol. 2010;57:317–25.CrossRefPubMed Naito S, Yamamoto N, Takayama T, et al. Prognosis of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in the cytokine era: a cooperative group report of 1463 patients. Eur Urol. 2010;57:317–25.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lamb GW, Aitchison M, Ramsey S, et al. Clinical utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients undergoing curative nephrectomy for renal clear cell cancer: basis of new prognostic scoring systems. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:279–83.CrossRefPubMed Lamb GW, Aitchison M, Ramsey S, et al. Clinical utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients undergoing curative nephrectomy for renal clear cell cancer: basis of new prognostic scoring systems. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:279–83.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preoperative Measurement of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Patient Survival in Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to Nephrectomy
Authors
Takuya Tsujino, MD
Kazumasa Komura, MD
Tomohisa Matsunaga, MD
Yuki Yoshikawa, MD
Tomoaki Takai, MD
Taizo Uchimoto, MD
Kenkichi Saito, MD
Naoki Tanda, MD
Rintaro Oide, BS
Koichiro Minami, MD
Hirofumi Uehara, MD
Seong Ho Jeong, BS
Kohei Taniguchi, MD, PhD
Hajime Hirano, MD, PhD
Hayahito Nomi, MD, PhD
Naokazu Ibuki, MD, PhD
Kiyoshi Takahara, MD, PhD
Teruo Inamoto, MD, PhD
Haruhito Azuma, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5948-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2017 Go to the issue