Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Breast Oncology

Positive Ultrasound-guided Lymph Node Needle Biopsy in Breast Cancer may not Mandate Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

Authors: Christine K. Harris, MD, Hanh Tam Tran, MD, Katherine Lee, Charles Mylander, PhD, Daina Pack, MD, Martin Rosman, MD, Lorraine Tafra, MD, FACS, Christopher B. Umbricht, MD, PhD, Reema Andrade, MBBS, Wen Liang, DO, Rubie Sue Jackson, MD, MPH

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ACOSOG Z0011 (Z11) trial demonstrated that in patients with nonpalpable axillary lymph nodes (LN) and one to two positive sentinel LN (SLN), axillary LN dissection (ALND) is unnecessary.JAMA 305:569–575, [2011], Ann Surg 264:413–42, [2016] The Z11 trial did not require preoperative axillary ultrasound (axUS). In many centers, preoperative axUS is part of the standard workup of a newly diagnosed breast cancer patient, but in light of the Z11 results, its role is now questioned.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at two institutions. Inclusion criteria were patients with (1) no palpable lymphadenopathy, (2) abnormal axUS, (3) axillary LN metastasis confirmed preoperatively by axUS-lymph node needle biopsy, (4) no neoadjuvant therapy, and (5) ALND. LN disease burden was dichotomized as N1 versus N2-3. We examined relationships between clinicopathologic factors, including axUS characteristics, and LN disease burden.

Results

Of 129 included cases, 67 had N1 disease (51.9%) and 62 had N2-3 disease (48.1%). Factors significantly associated with N1 disease were tumor size ≤2 cm (p = 0.012), nonlobular histology (p = 0.013), and one suspicious LN on axUS (p = 0.008). For patients with both tumor size on imaging ≤2 cm and one abnormal LN on axUS, only 27% had N2-3 disease (p = 0.007).

Conclusions

More than half of patients without palpable adenopathy but with preoperative US-guided biopsy proven axillary LN metastases had N1 disease. For patients with both tumor size ≤2 cm and only 1 abnormal LN on axUS, 73% had N1 disease. This suggests that such patients, if they are otherwise analogous to Z11 patients, may undergo attempt at SLNB.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305(6):569–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305(6):569–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: long-term follow-up from the american college of surgeons oncology group (alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):413–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giuliano AE, Ballman K, McCall L, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: long-term follow-up from the american college of surgeons oncology group (alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):413–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Francissen C, Teerenstra S, Strobbe LJ. Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the selection of patients with extensive axillary tumour burden in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):159–68.CrossRefPubMed van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Francissen C, Teerenstra S, Strobbe LJ. Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the selection of patients with extensive axillary tumour burden in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):159–68.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tahir M, Osman KA, Shabbir J, et al. Preoperative axillary staging in breast cancer-saving time and resources. Breast J. 2008;14(4):369–71.CrossRefPubMed Tahir M, Osman KA, Shabbir J, et al. Preoperative axillary staging in breast cancer-saving time and resources. Breast J. 2008;14(4):369–71.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference van Rijk MC, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE, et al. Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(1):31–5.CrossRefPubMed van Rijk MC, Deurloo EE, Nieweg OE, et al. Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can spare breast cancer patients unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(1):31–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Reyna C, Kiluk JV, Frelick A, Khakpour N, Laronga C, Lee MC. Impact of axillary ultrasound (AUS) on axillary dissection in breast conserving surgery (BCS). J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(7):813–8.CrossRefPubMed Reyna C, Kiluk JV, Frelick A, Khakpour N, Laronga C, Lee MC. Impact of axillary ultrasound (AUS) on axillary dissection in breast conserving surgery (BCS). J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(7):813–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pilewskie M, Jochelson M, Gooch JC, Patil S, Stempel M, Morrow M. Is preoperative axillary imaging beneficial in identifying clinically node-negative patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection? J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(2):138–45.CrossRefPubMed Pilewskie M, Jochelson M, Gooch JC, Patil S, Stempel M, Morrow M. Is preoperative axillary imaging beneficial in identifying clinically node-negative patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection? J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(2):138–45.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pilewskie M, Mautner SK, Stempel M, Eaton A, Morrow M. Does a positive axillary lymph node needle biopsy result predict the need for an axillary lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients in the ACOSOG Z0011 era? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1123–8.CrossRefPubMed Pilewskie M, Mautner SK, Stempel M, Eaton A, Morrow M. Does a positive axillary lymph node needle biopsy result predict the need for an axillary lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients in the ACOSOG Z0011 era? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1123–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Hunt KK, et al. Axillary ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on sentinel lymph node surgery: results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology group Z1071 trial (alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(30):3386–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Hunt KK, et al. Axillary ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on sentinel lymph node surgery: results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology group Z1071 trial (alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(30):3386–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kuru B, Gulcelik MA, Topgul K, et al. Application of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients with clinically negative and positive axilla and role of axillary ultrasound examination to select patients for sentinel node biopsy. J BUON. 2011;16(3):454–9.PubMed Kuru B, Gulcelik MA, Topgul K, et al. Application of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients with clinically negative and positive axilla and role of axillary ultrasound examination to select patients for sentinel node biopsy. J BUON. 2011;16(3):454–9.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Positive Ultrasound-guided Lymph Node Needle Biopsy in Breast Cancer may not Mandate Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
Authors
Christine K. Harris, MD
Hanh Tam Tran, MD
Katherine Lee
Charles Mylander, PhD
Daina Pack, MD
Martin Rosman, MD
Lorraine Tafra, MD, FACS
Christopher B. Umbricht, MD, PhD
Reema Andrade, MBBS
Wen Liang, DO
Rubie Sue Jackson, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5935-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2017 Go to the issue