Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Reconstructive Oncology

Complications in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Unilateral Versus Bilateral Reconstructions

Authors: Ryckie G. Wade, MBBS, MClinEd, PGCertHR, MRCS, FHEA, Sergio Razzano, MD (Hons), Elaine M. Sassoon, AB, FRCS (Plast), Richard M. Haywood, MBBS, FRCS (Plast), Rozina S. Ali, BSc, MBBS, MD, FRCS (Plast), Andrea Figus, MD (Hons), PhD (Hons), FEBOPRAS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The demand for bilateral breast reconstructions is rising worldwide. In the UK, approximately 30% of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy choose autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Although the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is gaining popularity, bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction remains a complex procedure and reliable outcome data are lacking. In the absence of clinical trials, evidence from cohort studies is needed to better inform clinicians and patients.

Methods

Over a 6-year period, all consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction were prospectively included and categorized as unilateral or bilateral reconstruction for comparative analyses of outcomes and complications, with the patient as the unit of analysis.

Results

Overall, 565 DIEP flaps were performed on 468 women (371 unilateral and 97 bilateral reconstructions [194 flaps]). Postoperative complications requiring reoperation were twice as likely for bilateral reconstructions (risk ratio [RR] 2.1, 95% CI 1.4–3.4, p = 0.002) and were mainly due to venous congestion (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–7.5, p = 0.011). The risk of total flap loss was six times greater in bilateral reconstruction (RR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6–26, p = 0.011). The rates of revision breast and abdominal surgery were similar between groups.

Conclusions

Both unilateral and bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions are safe, with a low risk of complications; however, bilateral reconstruction was associated with a higher risk of complications and total flap loss. This information should be highlighted to patients requesting bilateral breast reconstruction, particularly those requesting risk-reducing mastectomy and reconstruction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51(2):15-36.CrossRefPubMed Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51(2):15-36.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Han E, Johnson N, Glissmeyer M, et al. Increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomies: the patient perspective. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):615-618.CrossRefPubMed Han E, Johnson N, Glissmeyer M, et al. Increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomies: the patient perspective. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):615-618.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Brewster AM, Parker PA. Current knowledge on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with sporadic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(7):935-941.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brewster AM, Parker PA. Current knowledge on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with sporadic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(7):935-941.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Evolution of bilateral free flap breast reconstruction over 10 years: optimizing outcomes and comparison to unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):946e-953e.CrossRefPubMed Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Evolution of bilateral free flap breast reconstruction over 10 years: optimizing outcomes and comparison to unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):946e-953e.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 127(1):15-22.CrossRefPubMed Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 127(1):15-22.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Improving outcomes in breast cancer. London: NICE; 2010. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Improving outcomes in breast cancer. London: NICE; 2010.
7.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick AM, Gao LL, Smith BL, Austen WG, Liao EC. Evolution of breast reconstruction paradigm with increased incidence of prophylactic mastectomy. American Association of Plastic Surgeons 91st Annual Meeting and Symposium; 14–17 April 2012, San Francisco, CA. Fitzpatrick AM, Gao LL, Smith BL, Austen WG, Liao EC. Evolution of breast reconstruction paradigm with increased incidence of prophylactic mastectomy. American Association of Plastic Surgeons 91st Annual Meeting and Symposium; 14–17 April 2012, San Francisco, CA.
8.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):77-84.CrossRefPubMed Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):77-84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, Myers JL, et al. Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(19):3938-3943.CrossRefPubMed McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, Myers JL, et al. Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(19):3938-3943.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Geiger AM, Yu O, Herrinton LJ, et al. A population-based study of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy efficacy in women at elevated risk for breast cancer in community practices. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(5):516-520.CrossRefPubMed Geiger AM, Yu O, Herrinton LJ, et al. A population-based study of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy efficacy in women at elevated risk for breast cancer in community practices. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(5):516-520.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Shahedi K, Emanuelsson M, Wiklund F, Gronberg H. High risk of contralateral breast carcinoma in women with hereditary/familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast carcinoma. Cancer J. 2006;106(6):1237-1242.CrossRef Shahedi K, Emanuelsson M, Wiklund F, Gronberg H. High risk of contralateral breast carcinoma in women with hereditary/familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast carcinoma. Cancer J. 2006;106(6):1237-1242.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Herrinton LJ, Barlow WE, Yu O, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(19):4275-4286.CrossRefPubMed Herrinton LJ, Barlow WE, Yu O, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(19):4275-4286.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Peralta E, Ellenhorn J, Wagman L, Dagis A, Anderson J, Chu D. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;180(6):439-445.CrossRefPubMed Peralta E, Ellenhorn J, Wagman L, Dagis A, Anderson J, Chu D. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;180(6):439-445.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Enajat M, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Smit JM, Van Der Hulst RR, Acosta R. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for autologous reconstruction of large partial mastectomy defects. Microsurgery. 2011;31(1):12-17.CrossRefPubMed Enajat M, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Smit JM, Van Der Hulst RR, Acosta R. The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for autologous reconstruction of large partial mastectomy defects. Microsurgery. 2011;31(1):12-17.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Potter S, Browning D, Savovic J, Holcombe C, Blazeby JM. Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2015;102(9):1010-1025.CrossRefPubMed Potter S, Browning D, Savovic J, Holcombe C, Blazeby JM. Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2015;102(9):1010-1025.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS, et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1417-1424.CrossRefPubMed Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS, et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1417-1424.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Ahm Sørensen J. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(11):1474-1480.CrossRefPubMed Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Ahm Sørensen J. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(11):1474-1480.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Massey MF, Spiegel AJ, Levine JL, et al. Perforator flaps: recent experience, current trends, and future directions based on 3974 microsurgical breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 124(3):737-751.CrossRefPubMed Massey MF, Spiegel AJ, Levine JL, et al. Perforator flaps: recent experience, current trends, and future directions based on 3974 microsurgical breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 124(3):737-751.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, Dalio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1519-1526.CrossRefPubMed Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, Watson JP, Dalio AL, Crisera CA. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):1519-1526.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):1383-1391.CrossRefPubMed Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):1383-1391.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kaplan J, Allen RJ. Cost-based comparison between perforator flaps and TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):943-948.CrossRefPubMed Kaplan J, Allen RJ. Cost-based comparison between perforator flaps and TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):943-948.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kroll SS, Sharma S, Koutz C, et al. Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(2):338-341.CrossRefPubMed Kroll SS, Sharma S, Koutz C, et al. Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(2):338-341.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rozen WM, Ashton MW. Improving outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):327-335.CrossRef Rozen WM, Ashton MW. Improving outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):327-335.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wormald JC, Wade RG, Figus A. The increased risk of adverse outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction compared to unilateral reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(2):143-156.CrossRefPubMed Wormald JC, Wade RG, Figus A. The increased risk of adverse outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction compared to unilateral reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(2):143-156.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Nekhlyudov L, Bower M, Herrinton LJ, et al. Women’s decision-making roles regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Institute Monogr. 2005;35:55-60.CrossRef Nekhlyudov L, Bower M, Herrinton LJ, et al. Women’s decision-making roles regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Natl Cancer Institute Monogr. 2005;35:55-60.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(10):1823-1829.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(10):1823-1829.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Winters ZE. QUEST: a multi-centre randomised trial to assess the impact of the type and timing of breast reconstruction on quality of life following mastectomy. A pilot study. Funding Scheme—Feasibility Study Project Grant Funding Committee, Clinical Trials Awards and Advisory Committee; 2011. Winters ZE. QUEST: a multi-centre randomised trial to assess the impact of the type and timing of breast reconstruction on quality of life following mastectomy. A pilot study. Funding Scheme—Feasibility Study Project Grant Funding Committee, Clinical Trials Awards and Advisory Committee; 2011.
28.
go back to reference Winters ZE. CRUK/08/027: QUEST: a multi-centre randomised trial to assess the impact of the type and timing of breast reconstruction on quality of life following mastectomy. 2011. Winters ZE. CRUK/08/027: QUEST: a multi-centre randomised trial to assess the impact of the type and timing of breast reconstruction on quality of life following mastectomy. 2011.
29.
go back to reference Winters ZE, Emson M, Griffin C, et al. Learning from the QUEST multicentre feasibility randomization trials in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(1):45-56.CrossRefPubMed Winters ZE, Emson M, Griffin C, et al. Learning from the QUEST multicentre feasibility randomization trials in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Br J Surg. 2015;102(1):45-56.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Potter S, Holcombe C, Ward JA, Blazeby JM. Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(11):1360-1371.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Potter S, Holcombe C, Ward JA, Blazeby JM. Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102(11):1360-1371.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference de Blacam C, Ogunleye AA, Momoh AO, et al. High body mass index and smoking predict morbidity in breast cancer surgery: a multivariate analysis of 26,988 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program database. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):551-555.CrossRefPubMed de Blacam C, Ogunleye AA, Momoh AO, et al. High body mass index and smoking predict morbidity in breast cancer surgery: a multivariate analysis of 26,988 patients from the national surgical quality improvement program database. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):551-555.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mirzabeigi MN, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, et al. Tamoxifen (selective estrogen-receptor modulators) and aromatase inhibitors as potential perioperative thrombotic risk factors in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(4):670e-679e.CrossRefPubMed Mirzabeigi MN, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, et al. Tamoxifen (selective estrogen-receptor modulators) and aromatase inhibitors as potential perioperative thrombotic risk factors in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(4):670e-679e.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kelley BP, Valero V, Yi M, Kronowitz SJ. Tamoxifen increases the risk of microvascular flap complications in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):305-314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kelley BP, Valero V, Yi M, Kronowitz SJ. Tamoxifen increases the risk of microvascular flap complications in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):305-314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):792-798.CrossRefPubMed Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(3):792-798.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Ardehali B, Morritt AN, Jain A. Systematic review: anastomotic microvascular device. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(6):752-755.CrossRefPubMed Ardehali B, Morritt AN, Jain A. Systematic review: anastomotic microvascular device. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(6):752-755.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):148-158.CrossRefPubMed Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):148-158.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS, et al. Bilateral breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: an experience with 280 flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52(3):246-252.CrossRefPubMed Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Bidros RS, et al. Bilateral breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap: an experience with 280 flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52(3):246-252.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Drazan L, Vesely J, Hyza P, et al. Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years’ experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;61(11):1309-1315. Drazan L, Vesely J, Hyza P, et al. Bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: 4 years’ experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;61(11):1309-1315.
40.
go back to reference Rao SS, Parikh PM, Goldstein JA, Nahabedian MY. Unilateral failures in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(1):17-25.CrossRefPubMed Rao SS, Parikh PM, Goldstein JA, Nahabedian MY. Unilateral failures in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(1):17-25.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Crosby MA, Garvey PB, Selber JC, et al. Reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1025-1033.CrossRefPubMed Crosby MA, Garvey PB, Selber JC, et al. Reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1025-1033.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Venkat R, Lee JC, Rad AN, Manahan MA, Rosson GD. Bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: review of a single surgeon’s early experience. Microsurgery. 2012;32(4):275-280.CrossRefPubMed Venkat R, Lee JC, Rad AN, Manahan MA, Rosson GD. Bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: review of a single surgeon’s early experience. Microsurgery. 2012;32(4):275-280.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Scheer AS, Novak CB, Neligan PC, Lipa JE. Complications associated with breast reconstruction using a perforator flap compared with a free TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(4):355-358.CrossRefPubMed Scheer AS, Novak CB, Neligan PC, Lipa JE. Complications associated with breast reconstruction using a perforator flap compared with a free TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(4):355-358.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Beugels J, Hoekstra LT, Tuinder SMH, Heuts EM, van der Hulst RRWJ, Piatkowski AA. Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: a multicentre study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(9):1291–8.CrossRefPubMed Beugels J, Hoekstra LT, Tuinder SMH, Heuts EM, van der Hulst RRWJ, Piatkowski AA. Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: a multicentre study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(9):1291–8.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Figus A, Wade RG, Gorton L, Rubino C, Griffiths MG, Ramakrishnan VV. Venous perforators in DIEAP flaps: an observational anatomical study using duplex ultrasonography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(8):1051-1059.CrossRefPubMed Figus A, Wade RG, Gorton L, Rubino C, Griffiths MG, Ramakrishnan VV. Venous perforators in DIEAP flaps: an observational anatomical study using duplex ultrasonography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(8):1051-1059.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Rubino C, Ramakrishnan V, Figus A, Bulla A, Coscia V, MA. C. Flap size/flow rate relationship in perforator flaps and its importance in DIEAP flap drainage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 62(12):1666-1670.CrossRefPubMed Rubino C, Ramakrishnan V, Figus A, Bulla A, Coscia V, MA. C. Flap size/flow rate relationship in perforator flaps and its importance in DIEAP flap drainage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 62(12):1666-1670.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Figus A RV, Rubino C. Hemodynamic changes in the microcirculation of DIEP flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 60(6):644-648.CrossRefPubMed Figus A RV, Rubino C. Hemodynamic changes in the microcirculation of DIEP flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 60(6):644-648.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Slack PS, Coulson CJ, Ma X, Webster K, Proops DW. The effect of operating time on surgeons’ muscular fatigue. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(8):651-657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Slack PS, Coulson CJ, Ma X, Webster K, Proops DW. The effect of operating time on surgeons’ muscular fatigue. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(8):651-657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
go back to reference Dorion D, Darveau S. Do micropauses prevent surgeon’s fatigue and loss of accuracy associated with prolonged surgery? An experimental prospective study. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):256-259.CrossRefPubMed Dorion D, Darveau S. Do micropauses prevent surgeon’s fatigue and loss of accuracy associated with prolonged surgery? An experimental prospective study. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):256-259.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Marre D, Hontanilla B. Increments in ischaemia time induces microvascular complications in the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(1):80-86.CrossRefPubMed Marre D, Hontanilla B. Increments in ischaemia time induces microvascular complications in the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(1):80-86.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Colakoglu S, Khansa I, Curtis MS, et al. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1428-1436.CrossRefPubMed Colakoglu S, Khansa I, Curtis MS, et al. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1428-1436.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Leff DR, Ho C, Thomas H, et al. A multidisciplinary team approach minimises prophylactic mastectomy rates. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(8):1005–12.CrossRefPubMed Leff DR, Ho C, Thomas H, et al. A multidisciplinary team approach minimises prophylactic mastectomy rates. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(8):1005–12.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Razzano S, Gathura E, Sassoon EM, Ali R, Haywood RM, Figus A. Scarpa fascia preservation in abdominoplasty: does it preserve the lymphatics? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(5):898e–899e CrossRefPubMed Razzano S, Gathura E, Sassoon EM, Ali R, Haywood RM, Figus A. Scarpa fascia preservation in abdominoplasty: does it preserve the lymphatics? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(5):898e–899e CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke JP, Elm EV, Altman DG, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe) statement: guidelines for reporting. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-578.CrossRefPubMed Vandenbroucke JP, Elm EV, Altman DG, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe) statement: guidelines for reporting. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-578.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Complications in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Unilateral Versus Bilateral Reconstructions
Authors
Ryckie G. Wade, MBBS, MClinEd, PGCertHR, MRCS, FHEA
Sergio Razzano, MD (Hons)
Elaine M. Sassoon, AB, FRCS (Plast)
Richard M. Haywood, MBBS, FRCS (Plast)
Rozina S. Ali, BSc, MBBS, MD, FRCS (Plast)
Andrea Figus, MD (Hons), PhD (Hons), FEBOPRAS
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5807-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2017 Go to the issue