Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

A Novel Biomarker-Based Preoperative Prognostic Grading System for Predicting Survival After Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Tomoaki Yoh, MD, Satoru Seo, MD, PhD, Etsuro Hatano, MD, PhD, Kojiro Taura, MD, PhD, Hiroaki Fuji, MD, Yoshinobu Ikeno, MD, Yukihiro Okuda, MD, Kentaro Yasuchika, MD, PhD, Toshimi Kaido, MD, PhD, Hideaki Okajima, MD, PhD, Shinji Uemoto, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are shifting towards multidisciplinary approaches, preoperative radiographic methods for identifying patients requiring further therapy are unclear. This study was designed to establish a prognostic grading system using preoperatively available objective biomarkers.

Methods

A novel preoperative prognostic grading system for predicting survival after surgery for ICC was developed from multivariate analysis of 134 ICC patients who underwent surgery between 1996 and 2015 using preoperatively available biomarkers.

Results

The median overall survival time and 3- and 5 year survival rates were 33.3 months, 48, and 38%, respectively. Of the preoperative biomarkers, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥5), and C-reactive protein (≥5 mg/L) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (≥500 IU/mL) levels were independently associated with poor overall survival. Based on the presence of these factors, the preoperative prognostic grades were defined as follows: grade 1, no factor; grade 2, one factor; and grade 3, two or three factors. The median overall survival time and 3- and 5 year survival rates of patients with grade 1 (70.3 months, 66, and 53%, respectively) were higher than those of patients with grade 2 (23.4 months, 37, and 30%, respectively; P = 0.004) and grade 3 (8.8 months, 5% both; 2 vs. 3, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the preoperative prognostic grading system independently predicted survival after adjusting for known prognostic factors.

Conclusions

A novel biomarker-based preoperative prognostic grading system for ICC significantly stratifies survival after surgery and may identify patients requiring further treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aljiffry M, Abdulelah A, Walsh M, et al. Evidence-based approach to cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:134–47.CrossRefPubMed Aljiffry M, Abdulelah A, Walsh M, et al. Evidence-based approach to cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of the current literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:134–47.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ikai I, Arii S, Okazaki M, et al. Report of the 17th nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:676–91.CrossRefPubMed Ikai I, Arii S, Okazaki M, et al. Report of the 17th nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:676–91.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et.al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60:1268–89.CrossRefPubMed Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, et.al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014;60:1268–89.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, et al. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:565–74.CrossRefPubMed Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, et al. Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:565–74.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, et al. Italian Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Study Group. Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147:1107–13.CrossRefPubMed Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, et al. Italian Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Study Group. Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients. Arch Surg. 2012;147:1107–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Farges O, Fuks D, Boleslawski E, et al. Influence of surgical margins on outcome in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study by the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group. Ann Surg. 2011;254:824–30.CrossRefPubMed Farges O, Fuks D, Boleslawski E, et al. Influence of surgical margins on outcome in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study by the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group. Ann Surg. 2011;254:824–30.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3140–5.CrossRefPubMed de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3140–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jiang W, Zeng ZC, Tang ZY, Fan J, et al. A prognostic scoring system based on clinical features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the Fudan score. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1644–52.CrossRefPubMed Jiang W, Zeng ZC, Tang ZY, Fan J, et al. A prognostic scoring system based on clinical features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the Fudan score. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1644–52.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Roayaie S, Guarrera JV, Ye MQ, et al. Aggressive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:365–72.CrossRefPubMed Roayaie S, Guarrera JV, Ye MQ, et al. Aggressive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:365–72.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Maithel SK, Gamblin TC, Kamel I, et al. Multidisciplinary approaches to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119:3929–42.CrossRefPubMed Maithel SK, Gamblin TC, Kamel I, et al. Multidisciplinary approaches to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2013;119:3929–42.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Miura JT, Johnston FM, Tsai S, et al. Chemotherapy for surgically resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3716–23.CrossRefPubMed Miura JT, Johnston FM, Tsai S, et al. Chemotherapy for surgically resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3716–23.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1188–95.CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1188–95.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:432–8.CrossRefPubMed Hyder O, Marques H, Pulitano C, et al. A nomogram to predict long-term survival after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma an Eastern and Western experience. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:432–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Grobmyer SR, Wang L, Gonen M, et al. Perihepatic lymph node assessment in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:260–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grobmyer SR, Wang L, Gonen M, et al. Perihepatic lymph node assessment in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:260–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Okabayashi T, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, et al. A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables. Cancer. 2001;92(9):2374–83.CrossRefPubMed Okabayashi T, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, et al. A new staging system for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of preoperative and postoperative variables. Cancer. 2001;92(9):2374–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Marrero JA. Biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Liver Dis. 2014;3:101–3.CrossRef Marrero JA. Biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Liver Dis. 2014;3:101–3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Okamura Y, Sugiura T, Ito T, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as an indicator of the malignant behaviour of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2016;103:891–8.CrossRefPubMed Okamura Y, Sugiura T, Ito T, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as an indicator of the malignant behaviour of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2016;103:891–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mano Y, Shirabe K, Yamashita Y, et al. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a predictor of survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;258:301–5.CrossRefPubMed Mano Y, Shirabe K, Yamashita Y, et al. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a predictor of survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2013;258:301–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Malik HZ, Prasad KR, Halazun KJ, et al. Preoperative prognostic score for predicting survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2007;246:806–14.CrossRefPubMed Malik HZ, Prasad KR, Halazun KJ, et al. Preoperative prognostic score for predicting survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2007;246:806–14.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Saito H, Noji T, Okamura K, et al. A new prognostic scoring system using factors available preoperatively to predict survival after operative resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2016;159:842–51.CrossRefPubMed Saito H, Noji T, Okamura K, et al. A new prognostic scoring system using factors available preoperatively to predict survival after operative resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2016;159:842–51.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lin G, Liu Y, Li S, et al. Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7680. Lin G, Liu Y, Li S, et al. Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016. doi:10.​18632/​oncotarget.​7680.
22.
go back to reference Chen Q, Yang LX, Li XD, et al. The elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing hepatectomy. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:5283–9.CrossRefPubMed Chen Q, Yang LX, Li XD, et al. The elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing hepatectomy. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:5283–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gomez D, Morris-Stiff G, Toogood GJ, et al. Impact of systemic inflammation on outcome following resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:513–8.CrossRefPubMed Gomez D, Morris-Stiff G, Toogood GJ, et al. Impact of systemic inflammation on outcome following resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:513–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;40:205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;40:205–13.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yoh T, Hatano E, Nishio T, et al. Significant improvement in outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:2229–36.CrossRefPubMed Yoh T, Hatano E, Nishio T, et al. Significant improvement in outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40:2229–36.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Phillips C. Use and dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy and resections. Ann Surg. 2013;257:377–82.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Phillips C. Use and dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy and resections. Ann Surg. 2013;257:377–82.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bergquist JR, Ivanics T, Storlie CB, et al. Implications of CA19-9 elevation for survival, staging, and treatment sequencing in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a national cohort analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2016. doi:10.1002/jso.24381. Bergquist JR, Ivanics T, Storlie CB, et al. Implications of CA19-9 elevation for survival, staging, and treatment sequencing in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a national cohort analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2016. doi:10.​1002/​jso.​24381.
31.
go back to reference Nozoe T, Ninomiya M, Maeda T, et al. Prognostic nutritional index: a tool to predict the biological aggressiveness of gastric carcinoma. Surg Today. 2010;40:440–3.CrossRefPubMed Nozoe T, Ninomiya M, Maeda T, et al. Prognostic nutritional index: a tool to predict the biological aggressiveness of gastric carcinoma. Surg Today. 2010;40:440–3.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1028–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1028–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A Novel Biomarker-Based Preoperative Prognostic Grading System for Predicting Survival After Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Tomoaki Yoh, MD
Satoru Seo, MD, PhD
Etsuro Hatano, MD, PhD
Kojiro Taura, MD, PhD
Hiroaki Fuji, MD
Yoshinobu Ikeno, MD
Yukihiro Okuda, MD
Kentaro Yasuchika, MD, PhD
Toshimi Kaido, MD, PhD
Hideaki Okajima, MD, PhD
Shinji Uemoto, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5708-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2017 Go to the issue