Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016

01-12-2016 | Breast Oncology

Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer

Authors: Mariam Ali-Mucheru, MD, Barbara Pockaj, MD, Bhavika Patel, MD, Victor Pizzitola, MD, Nabil Wasif, MD, Chee-Chee Stucky, MD, Richard Gray, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is a new breast imaging technique. The role of CEDM in the surgical management of breast cancer has not yet been characterized.

Methods

A retrospective review of prospective breast surgery and breast imaging databases for patients who underwent CEDM and had breast cancer surgery.

Results

A total of 351 patients had CEDM; 128 had malignant lesions, and 101 of these underwent surgery with 105 malignancies identified. The mean age was 62 years (range 25–85 years). The histology was 65 % invasive ductal carcinoma, 16 % invasive lobular carcinoma, 11 % ductal carcinoma-in situ, 3 % mixed invasive ductal carcinoma/invasive lobular carcinoma, and 5 % other histologies. After excluding two lesions that had been removed before the examination, CEDM identified 98 % (n = 101/103) of the index lesions. The two lesions not identified were Paget disease only and a parasternal lesion too medial to include in the field of view. CEDM led to additional biopsies in 12 % (n = 12) of patients. Of these, 67 % (n = 8) proved to be invasive carcinoma and 33 % (n = 4) were benign. CEDM changed surgical management in 20 % (n = 20) of cancer patients with a 4 % (n = 4) rate of conversion to mastectomy.

Conclusions

Among patients undergoing surgical therapy for breast cancer, CEDM was highly sensitive, had size measurements that correlated well with histologic size, and produced a relatively low rate of false-positive additional biopsy findings. CEDM appears to be promising as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging in the surgical planning of these patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F, et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:256–64.CrossRefPubMed Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F, et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:256–64.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Remi J, Delaloge S. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69(1):34–42.CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Remi J, Delaloge S. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69(1):34–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Chou CP, Lewin JM, Chiang CL, et al. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis—comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2501–8.CrossRefPubMed Chou CP, Lewin JM, Chiang CL, et al. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis—comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2501–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2013;257:249–55.CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg. 2013;257:249–55.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mori M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suzuki S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Breast Cancer. (In press). Mori M, Akashi-Tanaka S, Suzuki S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Breast Cancer. (In press).
8.
go back to reference Luczynska E, Heinze-Paluchowska S, Dyczek S, Blecharz P, Rys J, Reinfuss M. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: comparison with conventional mammography and histopathology in 152 women. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:689–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luczynska E, Heinze-Paluchowska S, Dyczek S, Blecharz P, Rys J, Reinfuss M. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: comparison with conventional mammography and histopathology in 152 women. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:689–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:565–74.CrossRefPubMed Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:565–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:112–21.CrossRefPubMed Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:112–21.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology. 2003;229:261–8.CrossRefPubMed Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology. 2003;229:261–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS, et al. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology. 2013;266:743–51.CrossRefPubMed Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS, et al. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology. 2013;266:743–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.CrossRefPubMed Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer
Authors
Mariam Ali-Mucheru, MD
Barbara Pockaj, MD
Bhavika Patel, MD
Victor Pizzitola, MD
Nabil Wasif, MD
Chee-Chee Stucky, MD
Richard Gray, MD
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5567-7

Other articles of this Special Issue 5/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016 Go to the issue