Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Colorectal Cancer

Effect of High-Grade Disease on Outcomes of Surgically Treated Colon Cancer

Authors: Ramzi Amri, MD, PhD, Liliana G. Bordeianou, MD, MPH, David L. Berger, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Tumor grade is one of the cardinal pathological characteristics of colon cancer. Despite a large body of evidence on disease grade in general, the exact impact of high-grade disease in the context of the simplified high/low-grade dichotomy that is based on glandular formation rate has yet to be quantified.

Methods

Patients with sporadic colon cancer treated surgically at our center (2004–2011) were included in an institutional review board-approved database. We measured the rates of distant and nodal disease spread in baseline pathology and the multivariable hazard radio (mHR) of recurrence and overall- and disease-specific mortality.

Results

Among 922 patients with specified tumor grade in baseline surgical pathology, 175 (19.0 %) had high-grade disease. These patients were at far higher risk of lymph node metastasis (63.8 vs. 39.6 %; P < 0.001) and metastatic presentation (31.4 vs. 15.8 %; P < 0.001). These baseline differences also led to significantly worse outcomes, including disease recurrence (17.1 vs. 10.6 %; mHR = 1.83; P = 0.026), overall mortality (57.7 vs. 33.3 %; mHR = 1.65; P < 0.001), and colon cancer-specific mortality (39.4 vs. 16.9 %; mHR = 1.57; P = 0.004). Most significantly, in stage II patients (n = 294), those with high-grade disease (16.0 %) had an mHR of 2.84 (P < 0.001) for mortality.

Conclusions

High-grade disease on baseline surgical pathology is associated with a considerably higher rate of nodal and distant metastasis in colon cancer. As a result, the colon cancer-related mortality doubles for patients with high-grade disease. These findings were independent of baseline staging and confirm that the high-/low-grade tumor dichotomy is an important prognostic factor greatly influencing colon cancer outcomes across stages.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg. 1985;72(9):698–702.CrossRefPubMed Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg. 1985;72(9):698–702.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Blenkinsopp WK, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G, Fielding LP. Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1981;34(5):509–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blenkinsopp WK, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G, Fielding LP. Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1981;34(5):509–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton P, et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(10):1539–51.PubMedPubMedCentral Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton P, et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(10):1539–51.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):979–94.PubMed Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):979–94.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Weiser MR, Gonen M, Chou JF, Kattan MW, Schrag D. Predicting survival after curative colectomy for cancer: individualizing colon cancer staging. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(36):4796–802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weiser MR, Gonen M, Chou JF, Kattan MW, Schrag D. Predicting survival after curative colectomy for cancer: individualizing colon cancer staging. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(36):4796–802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Manilich EA, Kiran RP, Radivoyevitch T, Lavery I, Fazio VW, Remzi FH. A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(5):579–88.CrossRefPubMed Manilich EA, Kiran RP, Radivoyevitch T, Lavery I, Fazio VW, Remzi FH. A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(5):579–88.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Greene FL, Stewart AK, Norton HJ. A new TNM staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) colon cancer: an analysis of 50,042 patients. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):416–21. discussion 421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greene FL, Stewart AK, Norton HJ. A new TNM staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) colon cancer: an analysis of 50,042 patients. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):416–21. discussion 421.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Li M, Li JY, Zhao AL, Gu J. Colorectal cancer or colon and rectal cancer? Clinicopathological comparison between colonic and rectal carcinomas. Oncology. 2007;73(1–2):52–7.CrossRefPubMed Li M, Li JY, Zhao AL, Gu J. Colorectal cancer or colon and rectal cancer? Clinicopathological comparison between colonic and rectal carcinomas. Oncology. 2007;73(1–2):52–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2000. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2000.
10.
go back to reference Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–17.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–17.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Newland RC, Dent OF, Lyttle MN, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Pathologic determinants of survival associated with colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases. A multivariate analysis of 579 patients. Cancer. 1994;73(8):2076–82.CrossRefPubMed Newland RC, Dent OF, Lyttle MN, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Pathologic determinants of survival associated with colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases. A multivariate analysis of 579 patients. Cancer. 1994;73(8):2076–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wiggers T, Arends JW, Volovics A. Regression analysis of prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31(1):33–41.CrossRefPubMed Wiggers T, Arends JW, Volovics A. Regression analysis of prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31(1):33–41.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Deans GT, Patterson CC, Parks TG, et al. Colorectal carcinoma: importance of clinical and pathological factors in survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76(1):59–64.PubMedPubMedCentral Deans GT, Patterson CC, Parks TG, et al. Colorectal carcinoma: importance of clinical and pathological factors in survival. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76(1):59–64.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
go back to reference Hamilton SR. The adenoma-adenocarcinoma sequence in the large bowel: variations on a theme. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1992;16G:41–6.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton SR. The adenoma-adenocarcinoma sequence in the large bowel: variations on a theme. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1992;16G:41–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ, Greene FL, Stewart AK. Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):264–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ, Greene FL, Stewart AK. Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):264–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(19):1420–5.CrossRefPubMed O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(19):1420–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jass JR, Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Bussey HJR, Morson BC, Northover JMA, Todd IP. The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases. Histopathology. 1986;10(5):437–59.CrossRefPubMed Jass JR, Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Bussey HJR, Morson BC, Northover JMA, Todd IP. The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases. Histopathology. 1986;10(5):437–59.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Compton CC. Optimal pathologic staging: defining stage II disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(22 Pt 2):6862s–70s.CrossRefPubMed Compton CC. Optimal pathologic staging: defining stage II disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(22 Pt 2):6862s–70s.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of High-Grade Disease on Outcomes of Surgically Treated Colon Cancer
Authors
Ramzi Amri, MD, PhD
Liliana G. Bordeianou, MD, MPH
David L. Berger, MD
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4983-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2016 Go to the issue