Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Breast Oncology

Oncotype DX in Bilateral Synchronous Primary Invasive Breast Cancer

Authors: Maria Karsten, MD, Michelle Stempel, MPH, Julia Radosa, MD, Sujata Patil, PhD, Tari A. King, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Synchronous bilateral breast cancers frequently share the same estrogen receptor (ER) status, yet may differ in other histopathologic features. We sought to examine concordance rates of Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) testing in women with synchronous bilateral ER-positive breast cancer.

Methods

Institutional databases were reviewed to identify patients with synchronous (within 6 months) bilateral primary invasive breast cancer and multiple RSs. RSs were stratified by risk group (RS < 18, low; RS 18–30, intermediate; RS ≥ 31, high) and considered discordant if they reflected different risk groups.

Results

From 2005–2014, a total of 115 patients presented with synchronous bilateral invasive breast cancer; 43 (37 %) had two RSs available. Median patient age was 60 years (42–84), median tumor size was 1.2 cm (0.5–3.7), and all cases were HER2 negative and node negative. Of 86 RSs, 63 (73 %) were low risk, 20 (23 %) were intermediate risk, and 3 (3 %) were high risk. RSs were concordant in 29 (67 %) patients. Patients with concordant RSs were older (62 years vs. 56 years) and had median levels of progesterone receptor (PR) expression that were higher and more similar—80 and 85 % for bilateral cancers, respectively, compared with 55 and 75 % for bilateral cancers in discordant cases. Discordant RS led to a treatment change in 8/14 (57 %) cases.

Conclusions

Among women with synchronous bilateral ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, RSs were concordant in 67 % of cases. Concordance rates may be higher in older women or among those with comparable levels of PR expression. These data suggest that testing of both tumors should be considered in patients who are candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, et al. Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4063–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Goldstein LJ, Gray R, Badve S, et al. Prognostic utility of the 21-gene assay in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer compared with classical clinicopathologic features. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4063–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5287–312.PubMedCrossRef Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5287–312.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2817–26.PubMedCrossRef Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2817–26.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Albain KS, Paik S, van’tVeer L. Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in endocrine responsive, early breast cancer using multigene assays. Breast. 2009;18(Suppl 3):S141–5.PubMedCrossRef Albain KS, Paik S, van’tVeer L. Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in endocrine responsive, early breast cancer using multigene assays. Breast. 2009;18(Suppl 3):S141–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carlson JJ, Roth JA. The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141(1):13–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carlson JJ, Roth JA. The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141(1):13–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, et al. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(1):133–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, et al. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(1):133–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gollamudi SV, Gelman RS, Peiro G, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for stage I–II synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1997;79(7):1362–9.PubMedCrossRef Gollamudi SV, Gelman RS, Peiro G, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for stage I–II synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1997;79(7):1362–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kollias J, Ellis IO, Elston CW, et al. Clinical and histological predictors of contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(6):584–9.PubMedCrossRef Kollias J, Ellis IO, Elston CW, et al. Clinical and histological predictors of contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(6):584–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Toole MJ, Kidwell KM, Van Poznak C. Oncotype dx results in multiple primary breast cancers. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2014;8:1–6. Toole MJ, Kidwell KM, Van Poznak C. Oncotype dx results in multiple primary breast cancers. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2014;8:1–6.
10.
go back to reference Kilgore AR. The incidence of cancer in the second breast. JAMA. 1921;77:454–7.CrossRef Kilgore AR. The incidence of cancer in the second breast. JAMA. 1921;77:454–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Haagensen CD. The physiology of the breast as it concerns the clinician. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;109(2):206–9.PubMed Haagensen CD. The physiology of the breast as it concerns the clinician. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971;109(2):206–9.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Schwentner L, Wolters R, Wischnewsky M, et al. Survival of patients with bilateral versus unilateral breast cancer and impact of guideline adherent adjuvant treatment: a multi-centre cohort study of 5292 patients. Breast. 2012;21(2):171–7.PubMedCrossRef Schwentner L, Wolters R, Wischnewsky M, et al. Survival of patients with bilateral versus unilateral breast cancer and impact of guideline adherent adjuvant treatment: a multi-centre cohort study of 5292 patients. Breast. 2012;21(2):171–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hartman M, Czene K, Reilly M, et al. Incidence and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(27):4210–6.PubMedCrossRef Hartman M, Czene K, Reilly M, et al. Incidence and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(27):4210–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Holm M, Tjonneland A, Balslev E, et al. Prognosis of synchronous bilateral breast cancer: a review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(3):461–75.PubMedCrossRef Holm M, Tjonneland A, Balslev E, et al. Prognosis of synchronous bilateral breast cancer: a review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(3):461–75.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference de la Rochefordiere A, Asselain B, Scholl S, et al. Simultaneous bilateral breast carcinomas: a retrospective review of 149 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30(1):35–41.PubMedCrossRef de la Rochefordiere A, Asselain B, Scholl S, et al. Simultaneous bilateral breast carcinomas: a retrospective review of 149 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30(1):35–41.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Irvine T, Allen DS, Gillett C, et al. Prognosis of synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(4):376–80.PubMedCrossRef Irvine T, Allen DS, Gillett C, et al. Prognosis of synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(4):376–80.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nichol AM, Yerushalmi R, Tyldesley S, et al. A case-match study comparing unilateral with synchronous bilateral breast cancer outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(36):4763–8.PubMedCrossRef Nichol AM, Yerushalmi R, Tyldesley S, et al. A case-match study comparing unilateral with synchronous bilateral breast cancer outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(36):4763–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schmid SM, Pfefferkorn C, Myrick ME, et al. Prognosis of early-stage synchronous bilateral invasive breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(7):623–8.PubMedCrossRef Schmid SM, Pfefferkorn C, Myrick ME, et al. Prognosis of early-stage synchronous bilateral invasive breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(7):623–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Imyanitov EN, Suspitsin EN, Grigoriev MY, et al. Concordance of allelic imbalance profiles in synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2002;100(5):557–64.PubMedCrossRef Imyanitov EN, Suspitsin EN, Grigoriev MY, et al. Concordance of allelic imbalance profiles in synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2002;100(5):557–64.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Janschek E, Kandioler-Eckersberger D, Ludwig C, et al. Contralateral breast cancer: molecular differentiation between metastasis and second primary cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;67(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRef Janschek E, Kandioler-Eckersberger D, Ludwig C, et al. Contralateral breast cancer: molecular differentiation between metastasis and second primary cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;67(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shibata A, Tsai YC, Press MF, et al. Clonal analysis of bilateral breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2(4):743–8.PubMed Shibata A, Tsai YC, Press MF, et al. Clonal analysis of bilateral breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2(4):743–8.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Chen JJ, Wang Y, Xue JY, et al. A clinicopathological study of early-stage synchronous bilateral breast cancer: a retrospective evaluation and prospective validation of potential risk factors. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95185.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen JJ, Wang Y, Xue JY, et al. A clinicopathological study of early-stage synchronous bilateral breast cancer: a retrospective evaluation and prospective validation of potential risk factors. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95185.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hartman M, Czene K, Reilly M, et al. Genetic implications of bilateral breast cancer: a population based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(6):377–82.PubMedCrossRef Hartman M, Czene K, Reilly M, et al. Genetic implications of bilateral breast cancer: a population based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(6):377–82.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Ong F, et al. Synchronous, bilateral breast cancer: prognostic value and incidence. Breast. 2003;12(2):83–8.PubMedCrossRef Jobsen JJ, van der Palen J, Ong F, et al. Synchronous, bilateral breast cancer: prognostic value and incidence. Breast. 2003;12(2):83–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Buggi F, Folli S, Curcio A, et al. Multicentric/multifocal breast cancer with a single histotype: is the biological characterization of all individual foci justified? Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2042–6.PubMedCrossRef Buggi F, Folli S, Curcio A, et al. Multicentric/multifocal breast cancer with a single histotype: is the biological characterization of all individual foci justified? Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2042–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Saad RS, Denning KL, Finkelstein SD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of molecular markers in synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(10):1200–7.PubMedCrossRef Saad RS, Denning KL, Finkelstein SD, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of molecular markers in synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(10):1200–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Coradini D, Oriana S, Mariani L, et al. Is steroid receptor profile in contralateral breast cancer a marker of independence of the corresponding primary tumour? Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(6):825–30.PubMedCrossRef Coradini D, Oriana S, Mariani L, et al. Is steroid receptor profile in contralateral breast cancer a marker of independence of the corresponding primary tumour? Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(6):825–30.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hungness ES, Safa M, Shaughnessy EA, et al. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer: mode of detection and comparison of histologic features between the 2 breasts. Surgery. 2000;128(4):702–7.PubMedCrossRef Hungness ES, Safa M, Shaughnessy EA, et al. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer: mode of detection and comparison of histologic features between the 2 breasts. Surgery. 2000;128(4):702–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Oncotype DX in Bilateral Synchronous Primary Invasive Breast Cancer
Authors
Maria Karsten, MD
Michelle Stempel, MPH
Julia Radosa, MD
Sujata Patil, PhD
Tari A. King, MD
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4841-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2016 Go to the issue