Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2015

Open Access 01-10-2015 | Reconstructive Oncology

Systematization of Oncoplastic Surgery: Selection of Surgical Techniques and Patient-Reported Outcome in a Cohort of 1,035 Patients

Authors: Mahdi Rezai, MD, Sarah Knispel, Stephanie Kellersmann, Hildegard Lax, Rainer Kimmig, PhD, Peter Kern, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Functional and aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery are vital endpoints for patients with primary breast cancer. A large variety of oncoplastic techniques exist; however, it remains unclear which techniques yield the highest rates of local control at first surgery, omission of reexcision or subsequent mastectomy, and merits the highest degree of patient satisfaction.

Methods

In this retrospective case cohort trial with a customized investigational questionnaire for assessment of patient satisfaction with the surgical result, we analyzed 1,035 patients with primary, unilateral breast cancer and oncoplastic surgery from 2004 to 2009.

Results

Analysis of patient reported outcome (PRO) revealed that 88 % of the cohort was satisfied with their aesthetic result using oncoplastic techniques following the concept presented. These results also were achieved in difficult tumor localizations, such as upper inner and lower inner quadrant. Conversion rate from breast-conserving therapy to secondary mastectomy was low at 7.2 % (n = 68/944 patients). The systematization of oncoplastic techniques presented—embedded in a multimodal concept of breast cancer therapy—facilitates tumor control with a few number of uncomplicated techniques adapted to tumor site and size with a median resection of 32 (range 11–793) g. Five-year recurrence rate in our cohort was 4.0 %.

Conclusions

Patient´s satisfaction was independent from age, body mass index, resection volume, tumor localization, and type of oncoplastic surgery (p > 0.05). We identified postoperative pain as an important negative impact factor on patient´s satisfaction with the aesthetic result (p = 0.0001).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2013. Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2013.
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233-41.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233-41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(14):1143-50.CrossRefPubMed van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(14):1143-50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, Kaufman G, Massey E, Nos C. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1389–95.CrossRefPubMed Clough KB, Ihrai T, Oden S, Kaufman G, Massey E, Nos C. Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer based on tumour location and a quadrant-per-quadrant atlas. Br J Surg. 2012;99(10):1389–95.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6–11.CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yang JD, Bae SG, Chung HY, Cho BC, Park HY, Jung JH. The usefulness of oncoplastic volume displacement techniques in the superiorly located breast cancers for Korean patients with small to moderate-sized breasts. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67(5):474–80.CrossRefPubMed Yang JD, Bae SG, Chung HY, Cho BC, Park HY, Jung JH. The usefulness of oncoplastic volume displacement techniques in the superiorly located breast cancers for Korean patients with small to moderate-sized breasts. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67(5):474–80.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yang JD, Lee JW, Cho YK, Kim WW, Hwang SO, Jung JH, et al. Surgical techniques for personalized oncoplastic surgery in breast cancer patients with small- to moderate-sized breasts (part 2): volume replacement. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(1):7–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Yang JD, Lee JW, Cho YK, Kim WW, Hwang SO, Jung JH, et al. Surgical techniques for personalized oncoplastic surgery in breast cancer patients with small- to moderate-sized breasts (part 2): volume replacement. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(1):7–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sabel MS. Surgical considerations in early-stage breast cancer: lessons learned and future directions. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011;21(1):10–9.CrossRefPubMed Sabel MS. Surgical considerations in early-stage breast cancer: lessons learned and future directions. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011;21(1):10–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kramer S, Darsow M, Kummel S, Kimmig R, Rezai M. Breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer–oncological and reconstructive aspects. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008;48(2):56–62.CrossRefPubMed Kramer S, Darsow M, Kummel S, Kimmig R, Rezai M. Breast-conserving treatment of breast cancer–oncological and reconstructive aspects. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008;48(2):56–62.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rezai M, Nestle-Krämling C. Oncoplastic surgical techniques in breast-conserving therapy for carcinoma of the breast. Der Gynäkologe. 1999;32(2):83–90. Rezai M, Nestle-Krämling C. Oncoplastic surgical techniques in breast-conserving therapy for carcinoma of the breast. Der Gynäkologe. 1999;32(2):83–90.
11.
go back to reference Masetti R, Di Leone A, Franceschini G, Magno S, Terribile D, Fabbri MC, et al. Oncoplastic techniques in the conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer: an overview. Breast J. 2006;12(5 Suppl 2):S174–80.CrossRefPubMed Masetti R, Di Leone A, Franceschini G, Magno S, Terribile D, Fabbri MC, et al. Oncoplastic techniques in the conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer: an overview. Breast J. 2006;12(5 Suppl 2):S174–80.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collinc CA. Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer. 91;2273–81. Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collinc CA. Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer. 91;2273–81.
13.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ, et al. Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(8):1736–47.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ, et al. Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(8):1736–47.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Zurrida S. Breast conservation: current results and future perspectives at the European Institute of Oncology. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(7):1381–6.CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Zurrida S. Breast conservation: current results and future perspectives at the European Institute of Oncology. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(7):1381–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Fatouros M, Roukos DH, Arampatzis I, Sotiriadis A, Paraskevaidis E, Kappas AM. Factors increasing local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005;5(4):737–45.CrossRefPubMed Fatouros M, Roukos DH, Arampatzis I, Sotiriadis A, Paraskevaidis E, Kappas AM. Factors increasing local recurrence in breast-conserving surgery. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005;5(4):737–45.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Moran MS, Haffty BG. Local-regional breast cancer recurrence: prognostic groups based on patterns of failure. Breast J. 2002;8(2):81–7.CrossRefPubMed Moran MS, Haffty BG. Local-regional breast cancer recurrence: prognostic groups based on patterns of failure. Breast J. 2002;8(2):81–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Martin RC 2nd, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4):399–402.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar AB, Martin RC 2nd, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4):399–402.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jung W, Kang E, Kim SM, Kim D, Hwang Y, Sun Y, et al. Factors associated with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(4):412–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jung W, Kang E, Kim SM, Kim D, Hwang Y, Sun Y, et al. Factors associated with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15(4):412–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rose M, Manjer J, Ringberg A, Svensson H. Surgical strategy, methods of reconstruction, surgical margins and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37:205–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rose M, Manjer J, Ringberg A, Svensson H. Surgical strategy, methods of reconstruction, surgical margins and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37:205–14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rezai M, Darsow M, Kummel S, Kramer S. Autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction–overview of techniques, indications and results. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008;48(2):68–75.CrossRefPubMed Rezai M, Darsow M, Kummel S, Kramer S. Autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction–overview of techniques, indications and results. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch. 2008;48(2):68–75.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Patani N, Mokbel K. Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111(3):391–403.CrossRefPubMed Patani N, Mokbel K. Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111(3):391–403.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(3):553–64.CrossRefPubMed Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(3):553–64.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, Sun P, Lickley HL, McCready DR, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12(4):331–7.CrossRefPubMed Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, Sun P, Lickley HL, McCready DR, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12(4):331–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dzierzanowski M, Melville KA, Barnes PJ, MacIntosh RF, Caines JS, Porter GA. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins. J Surg Oncol. 2005;90(2):71–6.CrossRefPubMed Dzierzanowski M, Melville KA, Barnes PJ, MacIntosh RF, Caines JS, Porter GA. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins. J Surg Oncol. 2005;90(2):71–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rath MG, Heil J, Domschke C, Topic Z, Schneider S, Sinn HP, et al. Predictors of resectability in breast-conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012. Rath MG, Heil J, Domschke C, Topic Z, Schneider S, Sinn HP, et al. Predictors of resectability in breast-conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012.
27.
go back to reference Semprini G, Cattin F, Vaienti L, Brizzolari M, Cedolini C, Parodi PC. Oncoplastic surgery and cancer relapses: cosmetic and oncological results in 489 patients. Breast. 2013. Semprini G, Cattin F, Vaienti L, Brizzolari M, Cedolini C, Parodi PC. Oncoplastic surgery and cancer relapses: cosmetic and oncological results in 489 patients. Breast. 2013.
28.
go back to reference Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Yuksel M, Camlibel M, Ozaslan C, Reis E. Comparison of outcomes of standard and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16(2):193–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Yuksel M, Camlibel M, Ozaslan C, Reis E. Comparison of outcomes of standard and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16(2):193–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Down SK, Jha PK, Burger A, Hussien MI. Oncological advantages of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in treatment of early breast cancer. Breast J. 2013;19(1):56–63.CrossRefPubMed Down SK, Jha PK, Burger A, Hussien MI. Oncological advantages of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in treatment of early breast cancer. Breast J. 2013;19(1):56–63.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Zurrida S. Preserving life and conserving the breast. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(7):736-2045(09)70117-2. Veronesi U, Zurrida S. Preserving life and conserving the breast. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(7):736-2045(09)70117-2.
31.
go back to reference Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Santos AC, Vrieling C, Christie D, Liljegren G, et al. Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J. 2007;13(2):140–6.CrossRefPubMed Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Santos AC, Vrieling C, Christie D, Liljegren G, et al. Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J. 2007;13(2):140–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Heneghan HM, Prichard RS, Lyons R, Regan PJ, Kelly JL, Malone C, et al. Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy: a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(11):937–43.CrossRefPubMed Heneghan HM, Prichard RS, Lyons R, Regan PJ, Kelly JL, Malone C, et al. Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy: a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(11):937–43.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kelly DA, Wood BC, Knoll GM, Chang SC, Crantford JC, Bharti GD, et al. Outcome analysis of 541 women undergoing breast conservation therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):435–7.CrossRefPubMed Kelly DA, Wood BC, Knoll GM, Chang SC, Crantford JC, Bharti GD, et al. Outcome analysis of 541 women undergoing breast conservation therapy. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):435–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1505–9.CrossRefPubMed Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90(12):1505–9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Heil J, Breitkreuz K, Golatta M, Czink E, Dahlkamp J, Rom J, et al. Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breast conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):541–7.CrossRefPubMed Heil J, Breitkreuz K, Golatta M, Czink E, Dahlkamp J, Rom J, et al. Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breast conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):541–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, Morgan AA. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(6):566–70.CrossRefPubMed Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, Morgan AA. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(6):566–70.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Ozmen T, Polat AV, Polat AK, Bonaventura M, Johnson R, Soran A. Factors affecting cosmesis after breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques in an experienced comprehensive breast center. Surgeon. 2014. Ozmen T, Polat AV, Polat AK, Bonaventura M, Johnson R, Soran A. Factors affecting cosmesis after breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques in an experienced comprehensive breast center. Surgeon. 2014.
38.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3331–7.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3331–7.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):274–80.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(2):274–80.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Fitoussi AD, Berry MG, Fama F, Falcou MC, Curnier A, Couturaud B, et al. Oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer: analysis of 540 consecutive cases [outcomes article. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):454–62.CrossRefPubMed Fitoussi AD, Berry MG, Fama F, Falcou MC, Curnier A, Couturaud B, et al. Oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer: analysis of 540 consecutive cases [outcomes article. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(2):454–62.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Xue DQ, Qian C, Yang L, Wang XF. Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(5):375–81.CrossRefPubMed Xue DQ, Qian C, Yang L, Wang XF. Risk factors for surgical site infections after breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(5):375–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Systematization of Oncoplastic Surgery: Selection of Surgical Techniques and Patient-Reported Outcome in a Cohort of 1,035 Patients
Authors
Mahdi Rezai, MD
Sarah Knispel
Stephanie Kellersmann
Hildegard Lax
Rainer Kimmig, PhD
Peter Kern, MD
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4396-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2015 Go to the issue