Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Thoracic Oncology

Pattern of Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Resection According to Center Volume: Results from a Large European Multicenter Study

Authors: Sheraz Markar, MRCS, Caroline Gronnier, PhD, Alain Duhamel, PhD, Jean-Marc Bigourdan, MD, Bogdan Badic, MD, Mael Chalret du Rieu, MD, Jérémie H. Lefevre, PhD, Kathleen Turner, PhD, Guillaume Luc, MD, Christophe Mariette, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High center procedural volume has been shown to reduce postoperative mortality (POM); however, the cause of POM has been poorly studied previously. The aim of this study was to define the pattern of POM and major morbidity in relation to center procedural volume.

Methods

Data from 2,944 consecutive adult patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in 30 centers between 2000 and 2010 were retrospectively collected. Data between patients who suffered 30-day POM were compared with those who did not. Factors associated with POM were identified using binary logistic regression, with propensity matching to compare low- (LV) and high-volume (HV) centers.

Results

The 30-day and in-hospital POM rates were 5.0 and 7.3 %, respectively. Pulmonary complications were the most common, affecting 38.1 % of patients, followed by surgical site infection (15.5 %), cardiovascular complications (11.2 %), and anastomotic leak (10.2 %). Factors that were independently associated with 30-day POM included American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV, LV center, anastomotic leak, pulmonary, cardiovascular and neurological complications, and R2 resection margin status. Surgical complications preceded POM in approximately 30 % of patients compared to medically-related causes in 68 %. Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated LV centers were significantly associated with increased 30-day POM, and POM secondary to anastomotic leak, and pulmonary- and cardiac-related causes.

Conclusions

The results of this large, multicenter study provide further evidence to support the centralization of esophagectomy to HV centers, with a lower rate of morbidity and better infrastructure to deal with complications following major surgery preventing further mortality.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P, et al. Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:253–262.PubMedCrossRef Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P, et al. Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:253–262.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260:244–51.PubMedCrossRef Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260:244–51.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mariette C, Piessen G, Balon JM, et al. Surgery alone in the curative treatment of localised oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:869–876.PubMedCrossRef Mariette C, Piessen G, Balon JM, et al. Surgery alone in the curative treatment of localised oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:869–876.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Markar SR, Schmidt H, Kunz S, et al. Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1238–1446.PubMedCrossRef Markar SR, Schmidt H, Kunz S, et al. Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1238–1446.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Markar SR, Low DE. Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1020–1026.PubMedCrossRef Markar SR, Low DE. Physiology, not chronology, dictates outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcomes in patients 80 years and older. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1020–1026.PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, et al. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1055–1063.PubMedCrossRef Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, et al. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1055–1063.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260:244–51.PubMedCrossRef Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260:244–51.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Almoudaris AM, Mamidanna R, Bottle A, et al. Failure to rescue patients after reintervention in gastroesophageal cancer surgery in England. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:272–276.PubMedCrossRef Almoudaris AM, Mamidanna R, Bottle A, et al. Failure to rescue patients after reintervention in gastroesophageal cancer surgery in England. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:272–276.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Sgromo B, et al. Individual risk modeling for esophagectomy: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1532–42.PubMedCrossRef Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Sgromo B, et al. Individual risk modeling for esophagectomy: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1532–42.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.PubMedCrossRef Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hamai Y, Hihara J, Taomoto J, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. Epub 11 Mar 2014. doi:10.1111/dote.12207. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Taomoto J, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. Epub 11 Mar 2014. doi:10.​1111/​dote.​12207.
14.
go back to reference Bosch DJ, Muijs CT, Mul VE, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:605–611.PubMedCrossRef Bosch DJ, Muijs CT, Mul VE, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:605–611.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Wiley; 2009. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Wiley; 2009.
17.
go back to reference Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trials. The MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310.PubMedCrossRef Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trials. The MIRO trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:310.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41–55.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schieman C, Wigle DA, Deschamps C, et al. Patterns of operative morality following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:645–651.PubMedCrossRef Schieman C, Wigle DA, Deschamps C, et al. Patterns of operative morality following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25:645–651.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, et al. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:99–103.PubMedCrossRef Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, et al. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:99–103.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Munashinge A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, et al. Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg. Epub 27 Jun 2014. Munashinge A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, et al. Is it time to centralize high-risk cancer care in the United States? Comparison of outcomes of esophagectomy between England and the United States. Ann Surg. Epub 27 Jun 2014.
Metadata
Title
Pattern of Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Resection According to Center Volume: Results from a Large European Multicenter Study
Authors
Sheraz Markar, MRCS
Caroline Gronnier, PhD
Alain Duhamel, PhD
Jean-Marc Bigourdan, MD
Bogdan Badic, MD
Mael Chalret du Rieu, MD
Jérémie H. Lefevre, PhD
Kathleen Turner, PhD
Guillaume Luc, MD
Christophe Mariette, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4310-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2015 Go to the issue