Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Concordance of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors as Prognostic Surrogate Indicators of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy

Authors: Sheng-Chieh Huang, MD, Jen-Kou Lin, PhD, Tzu-Chen Lin, MD, Wei-Shone Chen, MD, Shung-Haur Yang, MD, Huann-Sheng Wang, MD, Yuan-Tzu Lan, PhD, Chun-Chi Lin, MD, Jeng-Kai Jiang, PhD, Shih-Ching Chang, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is widely used as a tumor marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to evaluate the role of the degree of change in CEA levels during the treatment period and found that the degree of change highly correlated with disease survival and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria in evaluating therapy response.

Methods

A total of 447 metastatic CRC patients treated with surgery of the primary tumor followed by systemic therapy at a single center from the year 2000 through 2011 were reviewed. The degree of change in CEA levels was expressed as the CEA ratio (post-CEA/pre-CEA) and classified into four groups during the treatment period for further evaluation. The imaging change of the same population was also compared with the CEA ratio during the treatment period.

Results

The CEA ratio was significantly correlated with different chemotherapy regimens (p < 0.001), pre-treatment CEA level (p < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006), and tumor differentiation (p = 0.018). CEA ratio and imaging change according to RECIST criteria were both correlated with overall survival (p < 0.001). These two methods for evaluating treatment response were highly correlated (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

CEA ratio was found to be a reliable prognostic factor in stage IV CRC, and was highly correlated with the imaging survey according to RECIST criteria. Further prospective studies are essential to validate these findings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. Cancer registry annual report. December 2010 Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China. Cancer registry annual report. December 2010
2.
go back to reference Jessup JM, McGinnis LS, Steele GD Jr, et al. The National Cancer Data Base. Report on colon cancer. Cancer. 1996;78:918–926 Jessup JM, McGinnis LS, Steele GD Jr, et al. The National Cancer Data Base. Report on colon cancer. Cancer. 1996;78:918–926
3.
go back to reference Ju JH, Chang SC, Wang HS, et al. Changes in disease pattern and treatment outcome of colorectal cancer: a review of 5,474 cases in 20 years. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:855–862PubMedCrossRef Ju JH, Chang SC, Wang HS, et al. Changes in disease pattern and treatment outcome of colorectal cancer: a review of 5,474 cases in 20 years. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:855–862PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Erlichman C, Fine S, Wong A, et al. A randomized trial of fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:469–475PubMed Erlichman C, Fine S, Wong A, et al. A randomized trial of fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:469–475PubMed
5.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1041–1047PubMedCrossRef Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1041–1047PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2938–2947PubMed de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2938–2947PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2335–2342PubMedCrossRef Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2335–2342PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1670–1676PubMedCrossRef Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1670–1676PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–1417PubMedCrossRef Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–1417PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Desch CE, Benson AB III, Somerfield MR, et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8512–8519PubMedCrossRef Desch CE, Benson AB III, Somerfield MR, et al. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8512–8519PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer. 2000;88:1739–1757.PubMedCrossRef Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer. 2000;88:1739–1757.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bast RC Jr, Ravdin P, Hayes DF, et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology Tumor Markers Expert Panel. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1865–1878. Bast RC Jr, Ravdin P, Hayes DF, et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology Tumor Markers Expert Panel. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1865–1878.
15.
go back to reference Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:718–727.PubMedCrossRef Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:718–727.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5313–5527.PubMedCrossRef Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5313–5527.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1348–1360.PubMedCrossRef Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:1348–1360.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lin JK, Lin CC, Yang SH, et al. Early postoperative CEA level is a better prognostic indicator than is preoperative CEA level in predicting prognosis of patients with curable colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1135–1141.PubMedCrossRef Lin JK, Lin CC, Yang SH, et al. Early postoperative CEA level is a better prognostic indicator than is preoperative CEA level in predicting prognosis of patients with curable colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1135–1141.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Preketes AP, King J, Caplehorn JR, et al. CEA reduction after cryotherapy for liver metastases from colon cancer predicts survival. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64(9):612–614.PubMedCrossRef Preketes AP, King J, Caplehorn JR, et al. CEA reduction after cryotherapy for liver metastases from colon cancer predicts survival. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64(9):612–614.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ward U, Primrose JN, Finan PJ, et al. The use of tumour markers CEA, CA-195 and CA-242 in evaluating the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1132–1135.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ward U, Primrose JN, Finan PJ, et al. The use of tumour markers CEA, CA-195 and CA-242 in evaluating the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993;67:1132–1135.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mayer RJ, Garnick MB, Steele GD Jr, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a monitor of chemotherapy in disseminated colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1978;42:1428–1433.PubMedCrossRef Mayer RJ, Garnick MB, Steele GD Jr, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a monitor of chemotherapy in disseminated colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1978;42:1428–1433.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(6):718–727.PubMedCrossRef Duffy MJ, van Dalen A, Haglund C, et al. Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(6):718–727.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fakih MG, Padmanabhan A. CEA monitoring in colorectal cancer. What you should know. Oncology (Williston Park). 2006;20(6):579–587. Fakih MG, Padmanabhan A. CEA monitoring in colorectal cancer. What you should know. Oncology (Williston Park). 2006;20(6):579–587.
24.
go back to reference Banaszkiewicz Z, Jarmocik P, Frasz J, et al. Usefulness of CEA concentration measurement and classic colonoscopy in follow-up after radical treatment of colorectal cancer. Pol Przegl Chir. 2011;83(6):310–318.PubMed Banaszkiewicz Z, Jarmocik P, Frasz J, et al. Usefulness of CEA concentration measurement and classic colonoscopy in follow-up after radical treatment of colorectal cancer. Pol Przegl Chir. 2011;83(6):310–318.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(33):5313–5327.PubMedCrossRef Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(33):5313–5327.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson AB, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(8):778–831.PubMed Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson AB, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(8):778–831.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GB, et al. Primary colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v70–7.PubMedCrossRef Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GB, et al. Primary colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 Suppl 5:v70–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Grem J. The prognostic importance of tumor markers in adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opinion Oncol. 1997;9:380–387.CrossRef Grem J. The prognostic importance of tumor markers in adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opinion Oncol. 1997;9:380–387.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Michelassi F, Ayala JJ, Balestracci T, et al. Verification of a new clinicopathologic staging system for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1991;214(1):11–18.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Michelassi F, Ayala JJ, Balestracci T, et al. Verification of a new clinicopathologic staging system for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1991;214(1):11–18.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Betge J, Pollheimer MJ, Lindtner RA, et al. Intramural and extramural vascular invasion in colorectal cancer: prognostic significance and quality of pathology reporting. Cancer. 2012;118(3):628–638.PubMedCrossRef Betge J, Pollheimer MJ, Lindtner RA, et al. Intramural and extramural vascular invasion in colorectal cancer: prognostic significance and quality of pathology reporting. Cancer. 2012;118(3):628–638.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ. Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(5):476–487.PubMedCrossRef Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ. Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(5):476–487.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Trillet-Lenoir V, Freyer G, Kaemmerlen P, et al. Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteria. Br J Radiol. 2002;75(899):903–908.PubMedCrossRef Trillet-Lenoir V, Freyer G, Kaemmerlen P, et al. Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteria. Br J Radiol. 2002;75(899):903–908.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Concordance of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors as Prognostic Surrogate Indicators of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy
Authors
Sheng-Chieh Huang, MD
Jen-Kou Lin, PhD
Tzu-Chen Lin, MD
Wei-Shone Chen, MD
Shung-Haur Yang, MD
Huann-Sheng Wang, MD
Yuan-Tzu Lan, PhD
Chun-Chi Lin, MD
Jeng-Kai Jiang, PhD
Shih-Ching Chang, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4228-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2015 Go to the issue