Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2014

01-11-2014 | Thoracic Oncology

Treatment of Clinical T2N0M0 Esophageal Cancer

Authors: Thomas J. Hardacker, BA, DuyKhanh Ceppa, MD, Ikenna Okereke, MD, Karen M. Rieger, MD, Shadia I. Jalal, MD, Julia K. LeBlanc, MD, John M. DeWitt, MD, Kenneth A. Kesler, MD, Thomas J. Birdas, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Management of clinical T2N0M0 (cT2N0M0) esophageal cancer remains controversial. We reviewed our institutional experience over 21 years (1990–2011) to determine clinical staging accuracy, optimal treatment approaches, and factors predictive of survival in this patient population.

Methods

Patients with cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer determined by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) were identified through a prospectively collected database. Demographics, perioperative data, and outcomes were examined. Cox regression model and Kaplan–Meier plots were used for statistical survival analysis.

Results

A total of 731 patients underwent esophagectomy, of whom 68 cT2N0M0 patients (9 %) were identified. Fifty-seven patients (84 %) had adenocarcinoma. Thirty-three patients (48.5 %) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, and 35 underwent surgical resection alone. All resections except one included a transthoracic approach with two-field lymph node dissection. Thirty-day operative mortality was 2.9 %. Only 3 patients (8.5 %) who underwent surgery alone had T2N0M0 disease identified by pathology: the disease of 15 (42.8 %) was found to be overstaged and 17 (48.5 %) understaged after surgery. Understaging was more common in poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.03). Nine patients (27.2 %) had complete pathologic response after chemoradiotherapy. Absence of lymph node metastases (pN0) was significantly more frequent in the neoadjuvant group (29 of 33 vs. 21 of 35, p = 0.01). Median follow-up was 44.2 months. Overall 5-year survival was 50.8 %. On multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma (p = 0.001) and pN0 after resection (p = 0.01) were significant predictors of survival.

Conclusions

EUS was inaccurate in staging cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer in this study. Poorly differentiated tumors were more frequently understaged. Adenocarcinoma and absence of lymph node metastases (pN0) were independently predictive of long-term survival. pN0 status was significantly more common in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, but long-term survival was not affected by neoadjuvant therapy. A strategy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection may be optimal in this group, especially in patients with disease likely to be understaged.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–6.PubMedCrossRef Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zuccaro G Jr, Rice TW, Vargo JJ, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound errors in esophageal cancer. Am J Gasteroenterol. 2005;100:601–6. Zuccaro G Jr, Rice TW, Vargo JJ, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound errors in esophageal cancer. Am J Gasteroenterol. 2005;100:601–6.
3.
go back to reference Rice TW, Mason DP, Murthy SC, et al. T2N0M0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:317–24.PubMedCrossRef Rice TW, Mason DP, Murthy SC, et al. T2N0M0 esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:317–24.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhang JQ, Hooker CM, Brock MV, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is beneficial for clinical stage T2 N0 esophageal cancer patients due to inaccurate preoperative staging. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:429–35.PubMedCrossRef Zhang JQ, Hooker CM, Brock MV, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is beneficial for clinical stage T2 N0 esophageal cancer patients due to inaccurate preoperative staging. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:429–35.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Crabtree TD, Kosinski AS, Puri V, et al. Evaluation of the reliability of clinical staging of T2 N0 esophageal cancer: a review of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:382–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Crabtree TD, Kosinski AS, Puri V, et al. Evaluation of the reliability of clinical staging of T2 N0 esophageal cancer: a review of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:382–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Kountourakis P, Correa AM, Hofstetter WL, et al. Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011;117:925–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Kountourakis P, Correa AM, Hofstetter WL, et al. Combined modality therapy of cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer: the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2011;117:925–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Kesler KA, Helft PR, Werner EA, et al. A retrospective analysis of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery or surgery alone. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1116–21.PubMedCrossRef Kesler KA, Helft PR, Werner EA, et al. A retrospective analysis of locally advanced esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery or surgery alone. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1116–21.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chandawarkar RY, Kakegawa T, Fujita H, Yamana H, Toh Y, Fujitoh H. Endosonography for preoperative staging of specific nodal groups associated with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 1996;20:700–2.PubMedCrossRef Chandawarkar RY, Kakegawa T, Fujita H, Yamana H, Toh Y, Fujitoh H. Endosonography for preoperative staging of specific nodal groups associated with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 1996;20:700–2.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference DeWitt J, Kesler K, Brooks JA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: impact of increased use of primary neoadjuvant therapy on preoperative locoregional staging accuracy. Dis Esophagus. 2005;18:21–7.PubMedCrossRef DeWitt J, Kesler K, Brooks JA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: impact of increased use of primary neoadjuvant therapy on preoperative locoregional staging accuracy. Dis Esophagus. 2005;18:21–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rohatgi A, Naji S, Hamouda A, et al.: Effect of understaging of early oesophageal cancers on treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(suppl):15572. Rohatgi A, Naji S, Hamouda A, et al.: Effect of understaging of early oesophageal cancers on treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(suppl):15572.
12.
go back to reference Crabtree TD, Yacoub WN, Puri V, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound for early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma: implications for staging and survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1509–15.PubMedCrossRef Crabtree TD, Yacoub WN, Puri V, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound for early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma: implications for staging and survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1509–15.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stiles BM, Mirza F, Coppolino A, et al. Clinical T2–T3N0M0 esophageal cancer: the risk of node positive disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:491–6.PubMedCrossRef Stiles BM, Mirza F, Coppolino A, et al. Clinical T2–T3N0M0 esophageal cancer: the risk of node positive disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:491–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Treatment of Clinical T2N0M0 Esophageal Cancer
Authors
Thomas J. Hardacker, BA
DuyKhanh Ceppa, MD
Ikenna Okereke, MD
Karen M. Rieger, MD
Shadia I. Jalal, MD
Julia K. LeBlanc, MD
John M. DeWitt, MD
Kenneth A. Kesler, MD
Thomas J. Birdas, MD
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3929-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2014 Go to the issue