Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Breast Oncology

Use of Hydrogel Breast Biopsy Tissue Markers Reduces the Need for Wire Localization

Authors: Peter W. Blumencranz, MD, FACS, Debra Ellis, RN, CCRP, Kylee Barlowe, BS, CCRP

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine whether breast biopsy tissue markers composed of an ultrasound-visible hydrogel reduced the need for preoperative wire localization (WL) in patients undergoing a partial mastectomy.

Methods

A single-surgeon, single-institution, retrospective chart review was performed on 691 consecutive female patients, with mean age 67 years (range 36–98 years), from 2009 to 2012 undergoing partial mastectomies after percutaneous biopsies by stereotactic or ultrasound guidance.

Results

Overall, the use of WL was more frequent in patients who had standard (other) markers placed during biopsy as opposed to those with hydrogel markers (HydroMARK). For stereotactic biopsy, 75.8 % of patients with a standard marker required WL versus 17.1 % with HydroMARK and for ultrasound biopsy, 22.6 % standard versus 4.3 % HydroMARK (p < .0001, p < .0001). In some cases where hydrogel markers were used, WL was used for “bracketing” because of the presence of microcalcifications. In cases where standard markers were used, WL was not used because of either IOUS visibility of residual lesion or marker visibility. Specimen volume and re-excision rate were comparable between patients with hydrogel and standard markers, showing no significant differences (p = .1673, p = .1813 respectively).

Conclusions

Hydrogel biopsy tissue markers optimize the surgeon’s ability to perform a partial mastectomy without the use of WL. HydroMARK was as effective as a standard marker in terms of partial mastectomy specimen volume and re-excision rate. This yields potential for cost savings, increased efficacy in operating room and radiology scheduling, and patient comfort and convenience.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Postma EL, Verkooijen HM, Van Esser S, Hobbelink MG, van der Schelling GP, Koelemij R, et al. Efficacy of “radioguided occult lesion localization” (ROLL) versus “wire-guided localization” (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomized controlled multicentre trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136:469–78.PubMedCrossRef Postma EL, Verkooijen HM, Van Esser S, Hobbelink MG, van der Schelling GP, Koelemij R, et al. Efficacy of “radioguided occult lesion localization” (ROLL) versus “wire-guided localization” (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: a randomized controlled multicentre trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136:469–78.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chen SC, Yang HR, Hwang TL, Chen MF, Cheung YC, Hsueh S. Intraoperative ultrasonographically guided excisional biopsy or vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg. 2003;238:738–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Chen SC, Yang HR, Hwang TL, Chen MF, Cheung YC, Hsueh S. Intraoperative ultrasonographically guided excisional biopsy or vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg. 2003;238:738–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Donker M, Drukker CA, Valdes Olmos RA, Rutgers EJ, Loo CE, Sonke GS, et al. Guiding breast-conserving surgery in patients after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: a comparison of radioactive seed localization with the ROLL technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2569–75. Donker M, Drukker CA, Valdes Olmos RA, Rutgers EJ, Loo CE, Sonke GS, et al. Guiding breast-conserving surgery in patients after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: a comparison of radioactive seed localization with the ROLL technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2569–75.
4.
go back to reference Ahmed M, Hemelrijck MV, Douek M. Systematic review of radioguided versus wire-guided localization in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:241–52.PubMedCrossRef Ahmed M, Hemelrijck MV, Douek M. Systematic review of radioguided versus wire-guided localization in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:241–52.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Alderliesten T, Loo CE, Pengel KE, Rutgers EJ, Gilhuijs KG, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Radioactive seed localization of breast lesions: an adequate localization method without seed migration. Breast J. 2011;17:594–601.PubMedCrossRef Alderliesten T, Loo CE, Pengel KE, Rutgers EJ, Gilhuijs KG, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Radioactive seed localization of breast lesions: an adequate localization method without seed migration. Breast J. 2011;17:594–601.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference MariscalMartinez A, Sola M, Perez de Tudela AP, Julian JF, Fraile M, Vizcaya S, et al. Radioguided localization of non-palpable breast cancer lesions: randomized comparison with wire localization in patients undergoing conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1001–9.PubMedCrossRef MariscalMartinez A, Sola M, Perez de Tudela AP, Julian JF, Fraile M, Vizcaya S, et al. Radioguided localization of non-palpable breast cancer lesions: randomized comparison with wire localization in patients undergoing conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1001–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thompson M, Henry-Tillman R, Margulies A, Thostenson J, Bryant-Smith G, Fincher R, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:148–56.PubMedCrossRef Thompson M, Henry-Tillman R, Margulies A, Thostenson J, Bryant-Smith G, Fincher R, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:148–56.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cox CE, Furman B, Stowell N, Ebert M, Clark J, Dupont E, et al. Radioactive seed localization breast biopsy and lumpectomy: can specimen radiographs be eliminated? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1039–47.PubMedCrossRef Cox CE, Furman B, Stowell N, Ebert M, Clark J, Dupont E, et al. Radioactive seed localization breast biopsy and lumpectomy: can specimen radiographs be eliminated? Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1039–47.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, Gardner M, Cox CE, et al. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2010;199:522–8.PubMedCrossRef Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, Gardner M, Cox CE, et al. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2010;199:522–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Margolin FR, Kaufman L, Denny SR, Jacobs RP, Schrumpf JD. Metallic marker placement after stereotactic core biopsy of breast calcifications: comparison of two clips and deployment techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1685–90.PubMedCrossRef Margolin FR, Kaufman L, Denny SR, Jacobs RP, Schrumpf JD. Metallic marker placement after stereotactic core biopsy of breast calcifications: comparison of two clips and deployment techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1685–90.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Murphy JO, Moo TA, King TA, Van Zee KJ, Villegas KA, Stempel M, et al. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4121–7.PubMedCrossRef Murphy JO, Moo TA, King TA, Van Zee KJ, Villegas KA, Stempel M, et al. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4121–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Peintinger F, Meric-Bernstam F, Perry AC, Hunt KK, Babiera GV, et al. Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244:464–70.PubMedPubMedCentral Boughey JC, Peintinger F, Meric-Bernstam F, Perry AC, Hunt KK, Babiera GV, et al. Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244:464–70.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Mook J, Klein R, Kobbermann A, Unzeitig A, Euhus D, Peng Y, et al. Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:886–91.PubMedCrossRef Mook J, Klein R, Kobbermann A, Unzeitig A, Euhus D, Peng Y, et al. Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:886–91.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Van Riet YEA, Maaskant AJG, Creemers GJ, van Warmerdam LJ, Jansen FH, van de Velde CJ, et al. Identification of residual breast tumour localization after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy using a radioactive 125 iodine seed. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:164–9.PubMedCrossRef Van Riet YEA, Maaskant AJG, Creemers GJ, van Warmerdam LJ, Jansen FH, van de Velde CJ, et al. Identification of residual breast tumour localization after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy using a radioactive 125 iodine seed. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:164–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Van Riet YEA, Jansen FH, Van Beek M, van de Velde CJ, Rutten HJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Localization of non-palpable breast cancer using a radiolabelled titanium seed. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1240–5.PubMedCrossRef Van Riet YEA, Jansen FH, Van Beek M, van de Velde CJ, Rutten HJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Localization of non-palpable breast cancer using a radiolabelled titanium seed. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1240–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barentsz MW, Van Dalen T, Gobardhan PD, Bongers V, Perre CI, Pijnappel RM, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for excision of non-palpable invasive breast cancer: a hospital-based series and an overview of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:209–19.PubMedCrossRef Barentsz MW, Van Dalen T, Gobardhan PD, Bongers V, Perre CI, Pijnappel RM, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for excision of non-palpable invasive breast cancer: a hospital-based series and an overview of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:209–19.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McGhan LJ, McKeever SC, Pockaj BA, Wasif N, Giurescu ME, Walton HA, et al. Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3096–101.PubMedCrossRef McGhan LJ, McKeever SC, Pockaj BA, Wasif N, Giurescu ME, Walton HA, et al. Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3096–101.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Klein RL, Mook JA, Euhus DM, Rao R, Wynn RT, Eastman AB, et al. Evaluation of a hydrogel based breast biopsy marker (HydroMARK) as an alternative to wire and radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast lesions. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:591–4.PubMedCrossRef Klein RL, Mook JA, Euhus DM, Rao R, Wynn RT, Eastman AB, et al. Evaluation of a hydrogel based breast biopsy marker (HydroMARK) as an alternative to wire and radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast lesions. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:591–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Use of Hydrogel Breast Biopsy Tissue Markers Reduces the Need for Wire Localization
Authors
Peter W. Blumencranz, MD, FACS
Debra Ellis, RN, CCRP
Kylee Barlowe, BS, CCRP
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3917-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2014 Go to the issue