Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Breast Oncology

Survival Outcomes of Metaplastic Breast Cancer Patients: Results from a US Population-based Analysis

Authors: Rebecca A. Nelson, PhD, Mary L. Guye, MD, Thehang Luu, MD, Lily L. Lai, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare histologic subtype needing further characterization. The aim of our study was to compare MBC to infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast and to identify demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and survival differences.

Methods

MBC and IDC patients were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) public-use data set. Disease-specific survival (DSS) differences were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess factors prognostic for DSS. To control for hormone receptor status, a subsequent planned analysis was completed for receptor-negative MBC and IDC. Lastly, a matched case-control analysis was conducted to minimize potential bias due to baseline demographic, clinical, and pathologic differences.

Results

The SEER data set included 1,011 MBC and 253,818 IDC patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2010. MBC patients had larger, higher grade tumors, had less frequent axillary nodal involvement, and were more likely to be treated with mastectomy. Five-year DSS rates were significantly worse for patients with MBC than for IDC patients (78 vs. 93 %, p < 0.0001) and for patients with receptor-negative MBC than receptor-negative IDC (77 vs. 85 %, p < 0.0001). The findings were confirmed on matched analysis. Prognostic factors identified on multivariate analyses included age, MBC histology, tumor grade, T stage, and axillary lymph node involvement.

Conclusions

MBC patients have shorter DSS than IDC patients. Improved clinical and biological understanding of MBC may result in more effective therapy and better cancer outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beatty JD, Atwood M, Tickman R, Reiner M. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical significance. Am J Surg. 2006;191:657–64.PubMedCrossRef Beatty JD, Atwood M, Tickman R, Reiner M. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical significance. Am J Surg. 2006;191:657–64.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gibson GR, Qian D, Ku JK, Lai LL. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and outcomes. Am Surg. 2005;71:725–30.PubMed Gibson GR, Qian D, Ku JK, Lai LL. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and outcomes. Am Surg. 2005;71:725–30.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Toumi Z, Bullen C, Tang AC, Dalal N, Ellenbogen S. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Pathol Int. 2011;61:582–8.PubMedCrossRef Toumi Z, Bullen C, Tang AC, Dalal N, Ellenbogen S. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Pathol Int. 2011;61:582–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K, Franko J, Klimberg VS, Bland K. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:166–73.PubMedCrossRef Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K, Franko J, Klimberg VS, Bland K. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:166–73.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Luini A, Aguilar M, Gatti G, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, an unusual disease with worse prognosis: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:349–53.PubMedCrossRef Luini A, Aguilar M, Gatti G, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, an unusual disease with worse prognosis: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:349–53.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Okada N, Hasebe T, Iwasaki M, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. Hum Pathol. 2010;41:960–70.PubMedCrossRef Okada N, Hasebe T, Iwasaki M, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. Hum Pathol. 2010;41:960–70.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yamaguchi R, Tanaka M, Kondo K, et al. Immunohistochemical study of metaplastic carcinoma and central acellular carcinoma of the breast: central acellular carcinoma is related to metaplastic carcinoma. Med Mol Morphol. 2012;45:14–21.PubMedCrossRef Yamaguchi R, Tanaka M, Kondo K, et al. Immunohistochemical study of metaplastic carcinoma and central acellular carcinoma of the breast: central acellular carcinoma is related to metaplastic carcinoma. Med Mol Morphol. 2012;45:14–21.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–81.PubMedCrossRef Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–81.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.PubMedCrossRef Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 13 Regs Research Data. Sub vintage 2009 pops (1992–2009) <Katrina/Rita population adjustment > Linked to country attributes—total US, 1969–2010 counties. Released April 2012, based on November 2011 submission. http://www.seer.cancer.gov/data/. Accessed Sept 2013. SEER*Stat Database: incidence—SEER 13 Regs Research Data. Sub vintage 2009 pops (1992–2009) <Katrina/Rita population adjustment > Linked to country attributes—total US, 1969–2010 counties. Released April 2012, based on November 2011 submission. http://​www.​seer.​cancer.​gov/​data/​. Accessed Sept 2013.
12.
go back to reference Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th edition. New York: Springer, 2010. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th edition. New York: Springer, 2010.
13.
go back to reference Bergstralh E, Kosanke J. Computerized matching of controls, Technical Report 56. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation; 1995. Bergstralh E, Kosanke J. Computerized matching of controls, Technical Report 56. Rochester, MN: Mayo Foundation; 1995.
14.
go back to reference Wargotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas and sarcomas of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;96:781.PubMed Wargotz ES, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas and sarcomas of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;96:781.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Weigelt B, Kreike B, Reis-Filho JS. Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like breast cancers: a genomic profiling analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:273–80.PubMedCrossRef Weigelt B, Kreike B, Reis-Filho JS. Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal-like breast cancers: a genomic profiling analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:273–80.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Korsching E, Jeffrey SS, Meinerz W, Decker T, Boecker W, Buerger H. Basal carcinoma of the breast revisited: an old entity with new interpretations. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:553–60.PubMedCrossRef Korsching E, Jeffrey SS, Meinerz W, Decker T, Boecker W, Buerger H. Basal carcinoma of the breast revisited: an old entity with new interpretations. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:553–60.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jung SY, Kim HY, Nam BH, et al. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:627–37.PubMedCrossRef Jung SY, Kim HY, Nam BH, et al. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:627–37.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bae SY, Lee SK, Koo MY, et al. The prognoses of metaplastic breast cancer patients compared to those of triple-negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:471–8.PubMedCrossRef Bae SY, Lee SK, Koo MY, et al. The prognoses of metaplastic breast cancer patients compared to those of triple-negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:471–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, Wold LE, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol. 1999;10:413–9.PubMedCrossRef Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, Wold LE, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol. 1999;10:413–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moulder S, Moroney J, Helgason T, et al. Responses to liposomal Doxorubicin, bevacizumab, and temsirolimus in metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: biologic rationale and implications for stem-cell research in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:e572–5.PubMedCrossRef Moulder S, Moroney J, Helgason T, et al. Responses to liposomal Doxorubicin, bevacizumab, and temsirolimus in metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: biologic rationale and implications for stem-cell research in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:e572–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nagao T, Kinoshita T, Hojo T, Tsuda H, Tamura K, Fujiwara Y. The differences in the histological types of breast cancer and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the relationship between the outcome and the clinicopathological characteristics. Breast. 2012;21:289–95.PubMedCrossRef Nagao T, Kinoshita T, Hojo T, Tsuda H, Tamura K, Fujiwara Y. The differences in the histological types of breast cancer and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the relationship between the outcome and the clinicopathological characteristics. Breast. 2012;21:289–95.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jung S, Kim H, Nam B, et al. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:627–37.PubMedCrossRef Jung S, Kim H, Nam B, et al. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:627–37.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hynes NE, Lane HA. ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:341–54.PubMedCrossRef Hynes NE, Lane HA. ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:341–54.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reis-Filho JS, Fernanda M, Carvalho S, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas exhibit EGFR, but not HER2, gene amplification and overexpression: immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R1028–35.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Reis-Filho JS, Fernanda M, Carvalho S, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas exhibit EGFR, but not HER2, gene amplification and overexpression: immunohistochemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R1028–35.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Survival Outcomes of Metaplastic Breast Cancer Patients: Results from a US Population-based Analysis
Authors
Rebecca A. Nelson, PhD
Mary L. Guye, MD
Thehang Luu, MD
Lily L. Lai, MD
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3890-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2015 Go to the issue