Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2014

01-10-2014 | Breast Oncology

Hormone Receptor Status Does Not Affect Prognosis in Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis with Comparison to Infiltrating Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas

Authors: G. Paul Wright, MD, Alan T. Davis, PhD, Tracy J. Koehler, MA, Marianne K. Melnik, MD, FACS, Mathew H. Chung, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Metaplastic breast cancer is a rare histologic variant among breast cancers. We sought to investigate the impact of hormone receptor status in metaplastic breast cancer and compare outcomes with common histologic variants of breast cancer.

Methods

The study was performed utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A query was made for patients with metaplastic breast cancer from 2000 to 2010. A separate query identified all patients with infiltrating ductal (IDC) or lobular (ILC) carcinoma during the same period. Effect of hormone receptor status was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Significance was assessed for p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 2,338 patients with metaplastic breast cancer were available for study. Most tumors were hormone receptor negative (79.0 %) and greater than or equal to grade 3 (82.9 %). For comparison, 382,667 and 44,813 patients with IDC and ILC, respectively, were obtained. Overall 5-year survival for metaplastic breast cancer was 62.2 % compared with 81.2 % for IDC (p < 0.001) and 80.2 % for ILC (p < 0.001). For metaplastic cases, no difference in 5-year survival was found between hormone-positive and hormone-negative tumors (65.7 vs. 63.5 %; p = 0.70). Multivariate analysis demonstrated metaplastic histology as an independent risk factor for cancer-related mortality both among hormone-positive (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.8–3.0; p < 0.001) and hormone-negative (HR 1.7; 95 % CI 1.5–1.9; p < 0.001) breast cancers.

Conclusion

Metaplastic breast cancer is an aggressive histologic variant that portends a poor prognosis compared with common breast cancer subtypes. Contrary to other breast cancers, hormone receptor positivity does not improve prognosis in metaplastic breast cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al. editors. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization;2000. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al. editors. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization;2000.
2.
go back to reference Luini A, Augilar M, Gatti G, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, an unusual disease with worse prognosis: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:349–353.PubMedCrossRef Luini A, Augilar M, Gatti G, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, an unusual disease with worse prognosis: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:349–353.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lee H, Jung SY, Ro JY, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinicopathological features and its prognosis. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:441–446.PubMedCrossRef Lee H, Jung SY, Ro JY, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinicopathological features and its prognosis. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:441–446.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Beatty JD, Atwood M, Tickman R, Reiner M. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical significance. Am J Surg. 2006;191:657–664.PubMedCrossRef Beatty JD, Atwood M, Tickman R, Reiner M. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinical significance. Am J Surg. 2006;191:657–664.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barnes PJ, Boutilier R, Chiasson D, Rayson D. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: clinical-pathologic characteristics and HER2/neu expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;91:173–178.PubMedCrossRef Barnes PJ, Boutilier R, Chiasson D, Rayson D. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: clinical-pathologic characteristics and HER2/neu expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;91:173–178.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jung SY, Kim HY, Nam BH, et al. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:627–637.PubMedCrossRef Jung SY, Kim HY, Nam BH, et al. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:627–637.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bae SY, Lee SK, Koo MY, et al. The prognoses of metaplastic breast cancer patients compared to those of triple-negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:471–478.PubMedCrossRef Bae SY, Lee SK, Koo MY, et al. The prognoses of metaplastic breast cancer patients compared to those of triple-negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126:471–478.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lai HW, Tseng LM, Chang TW, et al. The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB): a case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Breast. 2013;22:968–973.PubMedCrossRef Lai HW, Tseng LM, Chang TW, et al. The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB): a case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Breast. 2013;22:968–973.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;14:166–173.PubMedCrossRef Pezzi CM, Patel-Parekh L, Cole K. Characteristics and treatment of metaplastic breast cancer: analysis of 892 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;14:166–173.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology-breast cancer. Version 3.2013. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 3 Oct 2013. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology-breast cancer. Version 3.2013. http://​www.​nccn.​org. Accessed 3 Oct 2013.
13.
go back to reference Nassar A, Sookhan N, Santisteban M, et al. Diagnostic utility of snail in metaplastic breast carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. 2010;5:76. Nassar A, Sookhan N, Santisteban M, et al. Diagnostic utility of snail in metaplastic breast carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. 2010;5:76.
14.
go back to reference Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, Wold LE, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol. 1999;10:413–419.PubMedCrossRef Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, Wold LE, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Ann Oncol. 1999;10:413–419.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hormone Receptor Status Does Not Affect Prognosis in Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis with Comparison to Infiltrating Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas
Authors
G. Paul Wright, MD
Alan T. Davis, PhD
Tracy J. Koehler, MA
Marianne K. Melnik, MD, FACS
Mathew H. Chung, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3782-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2014 Go to the issue