Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2014

01-07-2014 | Breast Oncology

Supine Breast MRI and 3D Optical Scanning: A Novel Approach to Improve Tumor Localization for Breast Conserving Surgery

Authors: Matthew J. Pallone, PhD, Steven P. Poplack, MD, Hima Bindu R. Avutu, MD, Keith D. Paulsen, PhD, Richard J. Barth Jr., MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Wire localization for excision of nonpalpable breast cancer is an inefficient and inexact technique.

Methods

A total of 18 women with palpable invasive breast cancers underwent preoperative prone and supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intraoperatively, the edges of the tumor were palpated and marked on the skin surface. The breast was optically scanned, and the supine MRI was adjusted to match the actual breast position at the time of surgery. Image-defined tumor edges were marked on the surface of the breast. The main outcome measure was the distance between the image-defined and palpation-defined edges of the tumor.

Results

No significant difference was found between the mean maximal tumor diameter as measured by histopathology (29.6 ± 14.3 mm), supine MRI (25.3 ± 9.7 mm), prone MRI (27.6 ± 13 mm), or palpation (30.5 ± 9.3 mm). The distance from the tumor to the chest wall was markedly different in prone versus supine MRI (56.4 ± 38 vs 19.5 ± 20 mm, p = .002). The average distance between the palpated and supine MRI image-defined tumor edge locations was 7.2 mm (range, 0–19 mm). Accuracy improved over time; the average difference in edge locations in the last 7 patients was 4.0 mm. All 4 image-defined edge locations in the last 5 patients were ≤1 cm away from the palpated locations.

Conclusions

We have developed a method of breast tumor localization using preoperative supine MRI and intraoperative optical scanning that defines tumor size and position as accurately as palpation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kaufman CS, Delbecq R, Jacobson L. Excising the reexcision: stereotactic core-needle biopsy decreases need for reexcision of breast cancer. World J Surg. 1998;22:1023–8.PubMedCrossRef Kaufman CS, Delbecq R, Jacobson L. Excising the reexcision: stereotactic core-needle biopsy decreases need for reexcision of breast cancer. World J Surg. 1998;22:1023–8.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cangiarella J, Gross J, Symmans WF, Waisman J, Petersen B, D’Angelo D, et al. The incidence of positive margins with breast conserving therapy following mammotome biopsy for microcalcification. J Surg Oncol. 2000;74:263–6.PubMedCrossRef Cangiarella J, Gross J, Symmans WF, Waisman J, Petersen B, D’Angelo D, et al. The incidence of positive margins with breast conserving therapy following mammotome biopsy for microcalcification. J Surg Oncol. 2000;74:263–6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Harlow SP, Krag DN, Ames SE, Weaver DL. Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:241–6.PubMedCrossRef Harlow SP, Krag DN, Ames SE, Weaver DL. Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:241–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rahusen F, Bremers A, Fabry H, van Amerongen AH, Boom RP, Meijer S. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:994–8.PubMedCrossRef Rahusen F, Bremers A, Fabry H, van Amerongen AH, Boom RP, Meijer S. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:994–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman B, Kaufman L. Intraoperative ultrasound facilitates surgery for early breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:988–93.PubMedCrossRef Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman B, Kaufman L. Intraoperative ultrasound facilitates surgery for early breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:988–93.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Layeequr R, Crawford S, Larkin A, Quinlan R. Superiority of sonographic hematoma guided resection of mammogram only visible breast cancer: wire localization should be an exception—not the rule. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2228–32.CrossRef Layeequr R, Crawford S, Larkin A, Quinlan R. Superiority of sonographic hematoma guided resection of mammogram only visible breast cancer: wire localization should be an exception—not the rule. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2228–32.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B. Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1207–12.PubMed Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Sylvan M, Bone B. Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1207–12.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Boetes C, Mus R, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.PubMed Boetes C, Mus R, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197:743–7.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Davis P, Staiger M, Harris K, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr, et al. Breast cancer measurements with MRI, ultrasonography and mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 1996;37:1–9.CrossRef Davis P, Staiger M, Harris K, Ganott MA, Klementaviciene J, McCarty KS Jr, et al. Breast cancer measurements with MRI, ultrasonography and mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 1996;37:1–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, Schnall M, Reynolds C, Spitz FR, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.PubMedCrossRef Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, Schnall M, Reynolds C, Spitz FR, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: Systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J ClinOncol. 2008;26:3248–58.CrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: Systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J ClinOncol. 2008;26:3248–58.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schell AM, Rosenkranz K, Lewis PJ. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1438–44.CrossRef Schell AM, Rosenkranz K, Lewis PJ. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1438–44.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.PubMedCrossRef Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sakakibara M, Nagashima T, Sangai T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:62–8.PubMedCrossRef Sakakibara M, Nagashima T, Sangai T, Nakamura R, Fujimoto H, Arai M, et al. Breast-conserving surgery using projection and reproduction techniques of surgical-position breast MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:62–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Germano I. Advanced techniques in image-guided brain and spine surgery. New York: Thieme; 2002. Germano I. Advanced techniques in image-guided brain and spine surgery. New York: Thieme; 2002.
18.
go back to reference Herline AJ, Herring JL, Stefansic JD, Chapman WC, Galloway RL Jr, Dawant BM. Surface registration for use in interactive, image-guided liver surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2000;5:11–7.PubMed Herline AJ, Herring JL, Stefansic JD, Chapman WC, Galloway RL Jr, Dawant BM. Surface registration for use in interactive, image-guided liver surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2000;5:11–7.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hill DLG and Batchelor P. Registration methodology: concepts and algorithms. In: Hajnal JV, Hawkes DJ, and Hill DLG, eds. Medical image registration. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001:48. Hill DLG and Batchelor P. Registration methodology: concepts and algorithms. In: Hajnal JV, Hawkes DJ, and Hill DLG, eds. Medical image registration. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001:48.
20.
go back to reference Sorkine O. Least-squares rigid motion using SVD. Technical notes. 2009. Sorkine O. Least-squares rigid motion using SVD. Technical notes. 2009.
21.
go back to reference McAuliffe MJ, Lalonde FM, McGarry D, Gandler W, Csaky K, Trus BL. Medical image processing, analysis and visualization in clinical research. In: Computer-based medical systems. 14th IEEE symposium (Bethesda, MD). 2001:381–6. McAuliffe MJ, Lalonde FM, McGarry D, Gandler W, Csaky K, Trus BL. Medical image processing, analysis and visualization in clinical research. In: Computer-based medical systems. 14th IEEE symposium (Bethesda, MD). 2001:381–6.
Metadata
Title
Supine Breast MRI and 3D Optical Scanning: A Novel Approach to Improve Tumor Localization for Breast Conserving Surgery
Authors
Matthew J. Pallone, PhD
Steven P. Poplack, MD
Hima Bindu R. Avutu, MD
Keith D. Paulsen, PhD
Richard J. Barth Jr., MD
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3598-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2014 Go to the issue