Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013

01-10-2013 | Breast Oncology

Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Versus Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conservation, 2003–2010: A Report from the National Cancer Data Base

Authors: Tomasz Czechura, MPH, David J. Winchester, MD, Catherine Pesce, MD, Dezheng Huo, MD, PhD, David P. Winchester, MD, Katharine Yao, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in the utilization of accelerated partial-breast irradiation via brachytherapy (APBI-b), but larger, more contemporary studies examining overall APBI use are lacking.

Methods

A total of 575,438 nonneoadjuvant American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0 to II breast conservation patients were selected from the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2010 who underwent either whole-breast irradiation or APBI.

Results

Overall, 59,396 patients (10.3 %) underwent APBI. The use of APBI for the entire cohort increased from 3.4 % in 2003 to 12.8 % (p < 0.001) in 2008 and then decreased to 12.4 % in 2010. Three-dimensional conformal radiation increased from 0.8 to 2.2 %, intensity-modulated radiotherapy increased from 0.7 to 1.3 %, and brachytherapy (APBI-b) increased from 2.0 to 8.9 %. The most significant factors associated with APBI use were patient age and facility location. Patients 80–89 years old were 3.8 times more likely to undergo APBI compared to patients 30–39 years old (odds ratio [OR] 3.77, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.45–4.10, p < 0.001). Patients living in the West census region were 2.0 times more likely to undergo APBI compared to patients living in the Northeast (OR 2.0, 95 % CI 1.93–2.15, p < 0.001). Using the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines, among patients with noninvasive cancer who received APBI, 95.6 % were categorized as “cautionary” and 4.4 % as “unsuitable.” Of the invasive patients, 43.8 % were categorized as “suitable,” 47.0 % as “cautionary,” and 9.2 % as “unsuitable.”

Conclusions

The utilization of APBI has stabilized at approximately 12 % starting in 2008. The majority of APBI is delivered using APBI-b, with patient age being the most significant factor associated with APBI use.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barry M, Ho A, Morrow M. The evolving role of partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2534–40.PubMedCrossRef Barry M, Ho A, Morrow M. The evolving role of partial breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2534–40.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Keisch M, Vicini F, Beitch P, et al. American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Radiation Therapy System Registry Trial: ductal carcinoma-in situ subset analysis—4 year data in 194 treated lesions. Am J Surg. 2009;198:505–7.PubMedCrossRef Keisch M, Vicini F, Beitch P, et al. American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Radiation Therapy System Registry Trial: ductal carcinoma-in situ subset analysis—4 year data in 194 treated lesions. Am J Surg. 2009;198:505–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Giordano S. Radiotherapy in older women with low-risk breast cancer: why did practice not change? J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1–2.CrossRef Giordano S. Radiotherapy in older women with low-risk breast cancer: why did practice not change? J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1–2.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Benitez P, Streeter O, Vicini F, et al. Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study. Am J Surg. 2006;192:427–33.PubMedCrossRef Benitez P, Streeter O, Vicini F, et al. Preliminary results and evaluation of MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation for pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a phase II clinical study. Am J Surg. 2006;192:427–33.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smith D, Pan IW, Shih YC, et al. Adoption of intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:798–809.PubMedCrossRef Smith D, Pan IW, Shih YC, et al. Adoption of intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:798–809.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith G, Xu Y, Buchholz TA, et al. Brachytherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation: a rapidly emerging technology in breast cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:157–65.PubMedCrossRef Smith G, Xu Y, Buchholz TA, et al. Brachytherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation: a rapidly emerging technology in breast cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:157–65.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zauls A, Watkins JM, Wahlquist AE, et al. Outcomes in women treated with MammoSite brachytherapy or whole breast irradiation stratified by accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement groups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;8:21–9. Zauls A, Watkins JM, Wahlquist AE, et al. Outcomes in women treated with MammoSite brachytherapy or whole breast irradiation stratified by accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement groups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;8:21–9.
8.
go back to reference Vinh-Hung V, Verschraegen C. Breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy: pooled-analysis for risks of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:115–21.PubMedCrossRef Vinh-Hung V, Verschraegen C. Breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy: pooled-analysis for risks of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:115–21.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, et al. Twenty-five year follow up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:567–75.PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, et al. Twenty-five year follow up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:567–75.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abbott A, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Trends in the use of implantable accelerated partial breast irradiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United States. Cancer. 2011;117:3305–10.PubMedCrossRef Abbott A, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Trends in the use of implantable accelerated partial breast irradiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United States. Cancer. 2011;117:3305–10.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hattangadi J, Taback N, Neville BA, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using brachytherapy for breast cancer: patterns in utilization and guideline concordance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:29–41.PubMedCrossRef Hattangadi J, Taback N, Neville BA, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using brachytherapy for breast cancer: patterns in utilization and guideline concordance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:29–41.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bilimoria K, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria K, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, et al. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith B, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:269–77.PubMedCrossRef Smith B, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement from the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:269–77.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
16.
go back to reference Fritz A, Jack A, Parkin DM, et al. International classification of diseases for oncology. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. Fritz A, Jack A, Parkin DM, et al. International classification of diseases for oncology. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
17.
go back to reference United States Census. 2012. Accessed 13 Jan 2013. United States Census. 2012. Accessed 13 Jan 2013.
20.
go back to reference Polgar C, Fodor J, Major T, et al. Breast conserving treatment with partial or whole breast irradiation for low risk invasive breast carcinoma—5 year results of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:509–15.CrossRef Polgar C, Fodor J, Major T, et al. Breast conserving treatment with partial or whole breast irradiation for low risk invasive breast carcinoma—5 year results of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:509–15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Polgar C, Strnad V, Kovacs G. Partial-breast irradiation or whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010;186:113–4.PubMedCrossRef Polgar C, Strnad V, Kovacs G. Partial-breast irradiation or whole breast radiotherapy for early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010;186:113–4.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Shaitelman SF, Vicini FA, Beitsch P, Haffty B, Keisch M, Lyden M. Five year outcome of patients classified using the American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus statement guidelines for the application of accelerated partial breast irradiation: an analysis of patients treated on the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Registry Trial. Cancer. 2010;116:4677–85.PubMedCrossRef Shaitelman SF, Vicini FA, Beitsch P, Haffty B, Keisch M, Lyden M. Five year outcome of patients classified using the American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus statement guidelines for the application of accelerated partial breast irradiation: an analysis of patients treated on the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Registry Trial. Cancer. 2010;116:4677–85.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nelson J, Beitsch PD, Vicini FA, et al. Four year clinical update from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite brachytherapy trial. Am J Surg. 2009;198:83–91.PubMedCrossRef Nelson J, Beitsch PD, Vicini FA, et al. Four year clinical update from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite brachytherapy trial. Am J Surg. 2009;198:83–91.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Goyal S, Khan AJ, Vicini F, et al. Factors associated with optimal cosmetic results at 36 months in patients treated with accelerated partial irradiation (APBI) on the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MamoXite Breast Brachytherapy registry trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2450–8.PubMedCrossRef Goyal S, Khan AJ, Vicini F, et al. Factors associated with optimal cosmetic results at 36 months in patients treated with accelerated partial irradiation (APBI) on the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) MamoXite Breast Brachytherapy registry trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2450–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shah C, McGee M, Wilkinson B, et al. Clinical outcomes using accelerated partial breast irradiation in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer. 2010;12:259–63.CrossRef Shah C, McGee M, Wilkinson B, et al. Clinical outcomes using accelerated partial breast irradiation in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer. 2010;12:259–63.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Vicini F, Winter K, Straube W, et al. A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for stage I/II breast carcinoma: initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 0319. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:1531–7.PubMedCrossRef Vicini F, Winter K, Straube W, et al. A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for stage I/II breast carcinoma: initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 0319. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:1531–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Vicini F, Winter K, Straube W, et al. Initial efficacy results of RTOG 0319: three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for stage I/II breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:1120–7.PubMedCrossRef Vicini F, Winter K, Straube W, et al. Initial efficacy results of RTOG 0319: three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for stage I/II breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:1120–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Vicini F, Beitsch P, Quiet C, et al. Five-year analysis of treatment efficacy and cosmesis by the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;79:808–17.CrossRef Vicini F, Beitsch P, Quiet C, et al. Five-year analysis of treatment efficacy and cosmesis by the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;79:808–17.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Smith G, Xu Y, Buchholz TA, et al. Association between treatment with brachytherapy vs whole breast irradiation and subsequent mastectomy, complications, and survival among older women with invasive breast cancer. JAMA. 2010;307:1827–37.CrossRef Smith G, Xu Y, Buchholz TA, et al. Association between treatment with brachytherapy vs whole breast irradiation and subsequent mastectomy, complications, and survival among older women with invasive breast cancer. JAMA. 2010;307:1827–37.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hughes K, Schnaper LA, Berry D, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:971–7.PubMedCrossRef Hughes K, Schnaper LA, Berry D, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:971–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Du X, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS. Information on radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer: the advantages of the linked medicare and SEER data. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:463–70.PubMedCrossRef Du X, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS. Information on radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer: the advantages of the linked medicare and SEER data. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:463–70.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Malin J, Kahn KL, Adams J, et al. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:835–44.PubMedCrossRef Malin J, Kahn KL, Adams J, et al. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:835–44.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Versus Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Conservation, 2003–2010: A Report from the National Cancer Data Base
Authors
Tomasz Czechura, MPH
David J. Winchester, MD
Catherine Pesce, MD
Dezheng Huo, MD, PhD
David P. Winchester, MD
Katharine Yao, MD
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3154-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013 Go to the issue