Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013

01-10-2013 | Breast Oncology

The Value of 6-Month Interval Imaging after Benign Radiologic–Pathologic Concordant Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy

Authors: Demitra T. Manjoros, MD, Abigail E. Collett, BA, Jose J. Alberty-Oller, MD, Thomas G. Frazier, MD, Andrea V. Barrio, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend repeat imaging 6–12 months after a benign radiologic–pathologic concordant image-guided breast biopsy. We hypothesized that interval imaging <12 months after benign concordant biopsy has a low cancer yield and increases health care costs.

Methods

An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review identified 689 patients who underwent image-guided breast biopsy at Bryn Mawr Hospital between January and December 2010. Charts were evaluated for documentation of radiologic–pathologic concordance.

Results

Of 689 patients, 188 (27 %) had malignant pathology, 3 (0.4 %) had nonbreast pathology, and 498 (72.3 %) had benign pathology. Of 498 patients with benign findings, 44 (8.8 %) underwent surgical excision as a result of discordance, atypia, papillary lesion, or other benign finding. Of the remaining 454 patients who did not undergo excision, 337 (74.2 %) had documented radiologic–pathologic concordance. Interval imaging <12 months after benign biopsy was obtained in 182 (54.0 %) concordant patients. Five (2.7 %) patients had suspicious [American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4] findings on follow-up imaging. Only one breast cancer was identified, representing 0.5 % (95 % confidence interval 0–3.4) of all benign concordant patients undergoing interval imaging. The cost of detecting a missed cancer with interval imaging after benign concordant biopsy was $41,813.77 in this cohort.

Conclusions

Interval imaging performed <12 months after benign concordant breast biopsy demonstrated a low yield for the detection of breast cancer and resulted in increased health care costs. Our data support the policy for discontinuation of routine interval imaging after benign concordant biopsy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference III. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:504–20.PubMedCrossRef Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference III. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:504–20.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Verkooijen HM. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95 % surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer. 2002;99:853–9.PubMedCrossRef Verkooijen HM. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95 % surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer. 2002;99:853–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:595–600.PubMedCrossRef Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:595–600.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Shin S, Schneider HB, Cole FJ, et al. Follow-up recommendations for benign breast biopsies. Breast J. 2006;12:413–7.PubMedCrossRef Shin S, Schneider HB, Cole FJ, et al. Follow-up recommendations for benign breast biopsies. Breast J. 2006;12:413–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, et al. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology. 1999;212:189–94.PubMed Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, et al. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology. 1999;212:189–94.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy: an indicator of missed cancer. Cancer. 2000;89:2538–46.PubMedCrossRef Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy: an indicator of missed cancer. Cancer. 2000;89:2538–46.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
10.
go back to reference Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology. 1991;179:463–8.PubMed Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology. 1991;179:463–8.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, et al. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1999;210:799–805.PubMed Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, et al. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1999;210:799–805.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Margolin FR, Leung JW, Jacobs RP, et al. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years’ experience in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:559–64.PubMedCrossRef Margolin FR, Leung JW, Jacobs RP, et al. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years’ experience in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:559–64.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at MRI-Guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:852–9.PubMedCrossRef Lee JM, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at MRI-Guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:852–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chubak J, Boudreau DM, Fishman PA, et al. Cost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammograms. Med Care. 2010;48:815–20.PubMedCrossRef Chubak J, Boudreau DM, Fishman PA, et al. Cost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammograms. Med Care. 2010;48:815–20.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Value of 6-Month Interval Imaging after Benign Radiologic–Pathologic Concordant Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy
Authors
Demitra T. Manjoros, MD
Abigail E. Collett, BA
Jose J. Alberty-Oller, MD
Thomas G. Frazier, MD
Andrea V. Barrio, MD
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3114-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013 Go to the issue