Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2013

01-04-2013 | Colorectal Cancer

Do MRI Reports Contain Adequate Preoperative Staging Information for End Users to Make Appropriate Treatment Decisions for Rectal Cancer?

Authors: Eisar Al-Sukhni, MD, David E. Messenger, MB, ChB, J. Charles Victor, MSc, Robin S. McLeod, MD, Erin D. Kennedy, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to elicit end-user opinions regarding the importance and diagnostic accuracy of MRI for T-category, threatened or involved circumferential margin (CRMi), and lymph node involvement (LNi) for preoperative staging of rectal cancer and to determine completeness of MRI reports for these elements on a population based level.

Methods

The first part of this study was a mailed survey of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists to elicit their opinions regarding the importance and diagnostic accuracy of T-category, CRMi, and LNi on MRI. The second part of the study was an audit of MRI reports issued for pre-operative staging of rectal cancer to assess the completeness of these reports for T-category, CRMi, and LNi.

Results

Although T-category, CRMi, and LNi were considered essential by 97, 94, and 77 % of respondents, respectively, the MRI report audit showed that only 40 % of MRI reports captured all of these elements. The majority of end users reported moderate diagnostic accuracy on MRI for T-category and CRMi and low diagnostic accuracy for LNi (52.3, 43, and 48.5 % respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that specialty was the only independent predictor of correct reporting of the diagnostic accuracy for each of the MRI elements.

Conclusions

While end users consider T-category, CRMi and LNi essential for preoperative staging of rectal cancer, less than 40 % of MRI reports captured all of these elements. Therefore, strategies to improve communication between radiologists and end users are critical to improve the overall quality of care for rectal cancer patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–646.PubMedCrossRef Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):638–646.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):693–701.PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):693–701.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients–a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6199–6206.PubMedCrossRef Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients–a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6199–6206.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(9):1847–1858.PubMedCrossRef Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(9):1847–1858.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731–1740.PubMedCrossRef Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731–1740.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Michalski W, Bebenek M, Kryj M. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(10):1215–1223.PubMedCrossRef Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Michalski W, Bebenek M, Kryj M. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(10):1215–1223.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pietrzak L, Bujko K, Nowacki MP, et al. Quality of life, anorectal and sexual functions after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial. Radiother Oncol. 2007;84(3):217–225.PubMedCrossRef Pietrzak L, Bujko K, Nowacki MP, et al. Quality of life, anorectal and sexual functions after preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial. Radiother Oncol. 2007;84(3):217–225.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fleming FJ, Pahlman L, Monson JR. Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(7):901–912.PubMedCrossRef Fleming FJ, Pahlman L, Monson JR. Neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(7):901–912.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Beets-Tan RG. MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(5):392–395.PubMedCrossRef Beets-Tan RG. MRI in rectal cancer: the T stage and circumferential resection margin. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(5):392–395.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brown G, Daniels IR. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005;165:58–74.PubMedCrossRef Brown G, Daniels IR. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005;165:58–74.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15(1):9–20.PubMedCrossRef Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15(1):9–20.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging–a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2004;232(3):773–783.PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging–a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2004;232(3):773–783.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ, et al. Imaging for predicting the risk factors–the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease–of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;26(4):259–268.PubMedCrossRef Lahaye MJ, Engelen SM, Nelemans PJ, et al. Imaging for predicting the risk factors–the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease–of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;26(4):259–268.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Purkayastha S, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Tilney HS, Darzi AW, Heriot AG. Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(5):402–411.PubMedCrossRef Purkayastha S, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Tilney HS, Darzi AW, Heriot AG. Diagnostic precision of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of the circumferential margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(5):402–411.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2212–2223.PubMedCrossRef Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2212–2223.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2007. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2007.
17.
go back to reference American Association for Public Opinion and Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 4th ed. Lenexa: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2006. American Association for Public Opinion and Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 4th ed. Lenexa: American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2006.
18.
go back to reference Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;227(2):371–377.PubMedCrossRef Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;227(2):371–377.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, Kessels AG, Beets-Tan RG. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol. 2004;52(1):78–83.PubMedCrossRef Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, Kessels AG, Beets-Tan RG. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol. 2004;52(1):78–83.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Sugiyama M, Hachiya J, Atomi Y, Masaki T. MRI diagnosis of mesorectal lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma. What is the optimal criterion? Anticancer Res. 2004;24(6):4097–4101.PubMed Matsuoka H, Nakamura A, Sugiyama M, Hachiya J, Atomi Y, Masaki T. MRI diagnosis of mesorectal lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoma. What is the optimal criterion? Anticancer Res. 2004;24(6):4097–4101.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sobel JL, Pearson ML, Gross K, et al. Information content and clarity of radiologists’ reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol. 1996;3(9):709–717.PubMedCrossRef Sobel JL, Pearson ML, Gross K, et al. Information content and clarity of radiologists’ reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol. 1996;3(9):709–717.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sierra AE, Bisesi MA, Rosenbaum TL, Potchen EJ. Readability of the radiologic report. Invest Radiol. 1992;27(3):236–239.PubMedCrossRef Sierra AE, Bisesi MA, Rosenbaum TL, Potchen EJ. Readability of the radiologic report. Invest Radiol. 1992;27(3):236–239.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(3):591–598.PubMedCrossRef Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(3):591–598.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Austin R, Thompson B, Coory M, Walpole E, Francis G, Fritschi L. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations. Pathology. 2009;41(4):361–365.PubMedCrossRef Austin R, Thompson B, Coory M, Walpole E, Francis G, Fritschi L. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations. Pathology. 2009;41(4):361–365.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Branston LK, Greening S, Newcombe RG, et al. The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(6):764–772.PubMedCrossRef Branston LK, Greening S, Newcombe RG, et al. The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(6):764–772.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Karim RZ, van den Berg KS, Colman MH, McCarthy SW, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma. Histopathology. 2008;52(2):130–138.PubMedCrossRef Karim RZ, van den Berg KS, Colman MH, McCarthy SW, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA. The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma. Histopathology. 2008;52(2):130–138.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Barbosa F, Maciel LM, Vieira EM, Azevedo Marques PM, Elias J, Muglia VF. Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(1):15–21.PubMedCrossRef Barbosa F, Maciel LM, Vieira EM, Azevedo Marques PM, Elias J, Muglia VF. Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(1):15–21.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nakhleh RE, Fitzgibbon PL. Quality improvement manual in anatomic pathology. 2nd ed. Northfield: College of American Pathologists; 2002. Nakhleh RE, Fitzgibbon PL. Quality improvement manual in anatomic pathology. 2nd ed. Northfield: College of American Pathologists; 2002.
29.
go back to reference Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR, Norman AR, Mason B, Cunningham D. MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? Br J Cancer. 2006;94(3):351–357.PubMedCrossRef Burton S, Brown G, Daniels IR, Norman AR, Mason B, Cunningham D. MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? Br J Cancer. 2006;94(3):351–357.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Do MRI Reports Contain Adequate Preoperative Staging Information for End Users to Make Appropriate Treatment Decisions for Rectal Cancer?
Authors
Eisar Al-Sukhni, MD
David E. Messenger, MB, ChB
J. Charles Victor, MSc
Robin S. McLeod, MD
Erin D. Kennedy, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2738-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2013 Go to the issue