Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Melanomas

Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: Importance of Harvesting Nodes with Lower Radioactive Counts without the Need for Blue Dye

Authors: Liang-Chih Liu, MD, Brian M. Parrett, MD, Tyler Jenkins, BA, Wayne Lee, MD, Eugene Morita, MD, Patrick Treseler, MD, Laura Huang, BS, Suresh Thummala, MD, Robert E. Allen, MD, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet, MD, Stanley P. L. Leong, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Determining how many sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) should be removed for melanoma is important. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency at which nodes that are less radioactive than the “hottest” node (which is negative) are positive for melanoma, how low of a radioactivity should warrant harvest, and if isosulfan blue is necessary.

Methods

We reviewed 1,152 melanoma patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy with technetium, with or without blue dye, and SLN dissection from 1996 to 2008. SLNs with radioactivity ≥10% of the “hottest” SLN, all blue nodes, and all suspicious nodes were removed and analyzed. The miss rate was calculated as the proportion of node positive cases in which the “hottest” SLN was negative.

Results

SLNs were identified in 1,520 nodal basins in 1,152 patients. SLN micrometastases were detected in 218 basins (14%) in 204 patients (18%). In 16% of SLN-positive patients (33/204 patients), the positive SLN was found to have a lower radioactive count than the “hottest” SLN, which was negative. In 21 of these cases, the positive SLNs had radioactivity ≤50% of the “hottest” SLN. The 10% rule significantly reduced the miss rate to 2.5% compared with removal of only the “hottest” SLN (miss rate = 16%). Also, blue dye did not significantly decrease the miss rate compared with radiocolloid alone using the 10% rule.

Conclusions

To decrease the miss rate, all SLNs with ≥10% of the ex vivo radioactivity of the “hottest” SLN should be removed and blue dye is not essential.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992;127:392–9.PubMed Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992;127:392–9.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Reintgen D, Cruse CW, Wells K, et al. The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases. Ann Surg. 1994;220:759–67.PubMedCrossRef Reintgen D, Cruse CW, Wells K, et al. The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases. Ann Surg. 1994;220:759–67.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Satzger I, Meier A, Hoy L, Völker B, Kapp A, Hauschild A, Gutzmer R. Sentinel node dissection delays recurrence and prolongs melanoma-related survival: an analysis of 673 patients from a single center with long-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;Sep 14 [Epub ahead of print]. Satzger I, Meier A, Hoy L, Völker B, Kapp A, Hauschild A, Gutzmer R. Sentinel node dissection delays recurrence and prolongs melanoma-related survival: an analysis of 673 patients from a single center with long-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;Sep 14 [Epub ahead of print].
4.
go back to reference Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:976–83.PubMed Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:976–83.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Leong SP. Sentinel lymph node mapping and selective lymphadenectomy: the standard of care for melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2004;5:185–94.PubMedCrossRef Leong SP. Sentinel lymph node mapping and selective lymphadenectomy: the standard of care for melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2004;5:185–94.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Balch CM, Morton DL, Gershenwald JE, et al. Sentinel node biopsy and standard of care for melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:872–5.PubMedCrossRef Balch CM, Morton DL, Gershenwald JE, et al. Sentinel node biopsy and standard of care for melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:872–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bartolomei M, Testori A, Chinol M, et al. Sentinel node localization in cutaneous melanoma: lymphoscintigraphy with colloids and antibody fragments versus blue dye mapping. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998; 25:1489–94.PubMedCrossRef Bartolomei M, Testori A, Chinol M, et al. Sentinel node localization in cutaneous melanoma: lymphoscintigraphy with colloids and antibody fragments versus blue dye mapping. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998; 25:1489–94.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gershenwald JE, Tseng CH, Thompson W, et al. Improved sentinel lymph node localization in patients with primary melanoma with the use of radiolabeled colloid. Surgery. 1998;124:203–10.PubMedCrossRef Gershenwald JE, Tseng CH, Thompson W, et al. Improved sentinel lymph node localization in patients with primary melanoma with the use of radiolabeled colloid. Surgery. 1998;124:203–10.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leong SP, Donegan E, Heffernon W, et al. Adverse reactions to isosulfan blue during selective sentinel lymph node dissection in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:361–6.PubMedCrossRef Leong SP, Donegan E, Heffernon W, et al. Adverse reactions to isosulfan blue during selective sentinel lymph node dissection in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:361–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Montgomery LL, Thorne AC, Van Zee KJ, et al. Isosulfan blue dye reactions during sentinel lymph node mapping for breast cancer. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:385–8.PubMed Montgomery LL, Thorne AC, Van Zee KJ, et al. Isosulfan blue dye reactions during sentinel lymph node mapping for breast cancer. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:385–8.PubMed
11.
go back to reference McMasters KM, Reintgen DS, Ross MI, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: how many radioactive nodes should be removed? Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:192–7.PubMedCrossRef McMasters KM, Reintgen DS, Ross MI, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: how many radioactive nodes should be removed? Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:192–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Porter GA, Ross MI, Berman RS, et al. How many lymph nodes are enough during sentinel lymphadenectomy for primary melanoma? Surgery. 2000;128:306–11.PubMedCrossRef Porter GA, Ross MI, Berman RS, et al. How many lymph nodes are enough during sentinel lymphadenectomy for primary melanoma? Surgery. 2000;128:306–11.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Carlson GW, Murray DR, Thourani V, Hestley A, Cohen C. The definition of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma based on radioactive counts. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:929–33.PubMedCrossRef Carlson GW, Murray DR, Thourani V, Hestley A, Cohen C. The definition of the sentinel lymph node in melanoma based on radioactive counts. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:929–33.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC II, et al. Are 3 sentinel nodes sufficient? Arch Surg. 2007;142:456–9.PubMedCrossRef Chagpar AB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC II, et al. Are 3 sentinel nodes sufficient? Arch Surg. 2007;142:456–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scoggins CR, Martin RC, Ross MI, et al. Factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:709–17.PubMedCrossRef Scoggins CR, Martin RC, Ross MI, et al. Factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:709–17.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:302–11.PubMed Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:302–11.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cox CE, Salud CJ, Cantor A, et al. Learning curves for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping based on surgical volume analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:593–600.PubMedCrossRef Cox CE, Salud CJ, Cantor A, et al. Learning curves for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping based on surgical volume analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:593–600.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ross GL, Shoaib T, Scott J, Soutar DS, Gray HW, MacKie R. The learning curve for sentinel node biopsy in malignant melanoma. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55:298–301.PubMedCrossRef Ross GL, Shoaib T, Scott J, Soutar DS, Gray HW, MacKie R. The learning curve for sentinel node biopsy in malignant melanoma. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55:298–301.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Testori A, Bartolomei M, Grana C, et al. Sentinel node localization in primary melanoma: learning curve and results. Melanoma Res. 1999;9:587–93.PubMedCrossRef Testori A, Bartolomei M, Grana C, et al. Sentinel node localization in primary melanoma: learning curve and results. Melanoma Res. 1999;9:587–93.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kroon HM, Lowe L, Wong S, et al. What is a sentinel node? re-evaluating the 10% rule for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:623–8.PubMedCrossRef Kroon HM, Lowe L, Wong S, et al. What is a sentinel node? re-evaluating the 10% rule for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:623–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sagebiel RW. The pathology of melanoma as a basis for prognostic models: The UCSF Experience. Pigment Cell Res. 1994;7:101–3.PubMedCrossRef Sagebiel RW. The pathology of melanoma as a basis for prognostic models: The UCSF Experience. Pigment Cell Res. 1994;7:101–3.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Treseler PA, Tauch PS. Pathologic analysis of the sentinel lymph node. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:1695–719.PubMedCrossRef Treseler PA, Tauch PS. Pathologic analysis of the sentinel lymph node. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:1695–719.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Liu LC, Lang JE, Jenkins T, et al. Is it necessary to harvest additional lymph nodes after resection of the most radioactive sentinel lymph node in breast cancer? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:853–8.PubMedCrossRef Liu LC, Lang JE, Jenkins T, et al. Is it necessary to harvest additional lymph nodes after resection of the most radioactive sentinel lymph node in breast cancer? J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:853–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cody HS. Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Oncology. 1999;13:25–34.PubMed Cody HS. Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Oncology. 1999;13:25–34.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Soni M, Saha S, Koran A, et al. A prospective trial comparing 1% lymphazurin vs. 1% methylene blue in sentinel lymph node mapping of gastrointestinal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2224–30.PubMedCrossRef Soni M, Saha S, Koran A, et al. A prospective trial comparing 1% lymphazurin vs. 1% methylene blue in sentinel lymph node mapping of gastrointestinal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2224–30.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference O’Hea BJ, Hill AD, El-Shirbiny AM, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:423–7.PubMedCrossRef O’Hea BJ, Hill AD, El-Shirbiny AM, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: initial experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:423–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: Importance of Harvesting Nodes with Lower Radioactive Counts without the Need for Blue Dye
Authors
Liang-Chih Liu, MD
Brian M. Parrett, MD
Tyler Jenkins, BA
Wayne Lee, MD
Eugene Morita, MD
Patrick Treseler, MD
Laura Huang, BS
Suresh Thummala, MD
Robert E. Allen, MD
Mohammed Kashani-Sabet, MD
Stanley P. L. Leong, MD
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1689-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2011 Go to the issue