Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Head and Neck Oncology

Feasibility of Preservation of the Submandibular Gland During Neck Dissection in Patients With Early-Stage Oral Cancer

Authors: Tseng-Cheng Chen, MD, Pei-Jen Lou, MD, PhD, Jenq-Yuh Ko, MD, PhD, Tsung-Lin Yang, MD, PhD, Wu-Chia Lo, MD, Ya-Ling Hu, RN, MSc, Cheng-Ping Wang, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The impact of submandibular gland (SMG) preservation during neck dissection on the survival of patients with early-stage oral squamous-cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains undocumented.

Methods

The medical records of all patients with early-stage OSCC (stage I and II) who underwent wide excision of the primary tumor and simultaneous neck dissection between 1999 and 2006 at our facility were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

We analyzed 408 patients, including 33 patients with and 375 patients without SMG preservation. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 78.8% and 90.9% for the patients with SMG preservation and 75.4% and 90.4% for the patients without SMG preservation, and these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.79, P = 0.99, respectively). Similar survival rates between patients with and without SMG preservation were observed in those with oral tongue squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) and with buccal SCC. Patients with T2 OSCC with SMG preservation had significantly lower 5-year disease-free survival rate than those without SMG preservation (P = 0.02), but overall survival rates were similar between these two groups.

Conclusions

Preservation of the SMG during neck dissection may be oncologically safe in patients with T1 OSCC, but the feasibility of SMG preservation seems less clear for T2 OSCC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shingaki S, Takada M, Sasai K, et al. Impact of lymph node metastasis on the pattern of failure and survival in oral carcinomas. Am J Surg. 2003;185:278–84.PubMedCrossRef Shingaki S, Takada M, Sasai K, et al. Impact of lymph node metastasis on the pattern of failure and survival in oral carcinomas. Am J Surg. 2003;185:278–84.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shah JP. Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg. 1990;160:405–9.PubMedCrossRef Shah JP. Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg. 1990;160:405–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chen TC, Wang CT, Ko JY, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for primary early oral tongue cancer with pathologic N1 neck. Head Neck. 2010;32:555–61.PubMedCrossRef Chen TC, Wang CT, Ko JY, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for primary early oral tongue cancer with pathologic N1 neck. Head Neck. 2010;32:555–61.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Iype EM, Sebastian P, Mathew A, et al. The role of selective neck dissection (I–III) in the treatment of node negative (N0) neck in oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:1134–8.PubMedCrossRef Iype EM, Sebastian P, Mathew A, et al. The role of selective neck dissection (I–III) in the treatment of node negative (N0) neck in oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:1134–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cunning DM, Lipke N, Wax MK. Significance of unilateral submandibular gland excision on salivary flow in noncancer patients. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:812–5.PubMedCrossRef Cunning DM, Lipke N, Wax MK. Significance of unilateral submandibular gland excision on salivary flow in noncancer patients. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:812–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jacob RF, Weber RS, King GE. Whole salivary flow rates following submandibular gland resection. Head Neck. 1996;18:242–7.PubMedCrossRef Jacob RF, Weber RS, King GE. Whole salivary flow rates following submandibular gland resection. Head Neck. 1996;18:242–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Saarilahti K, Kouri M, Collan J, et al. Sparing of the submandibular glands by intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78:270–5.PubMedCrossRef Saarilahti K, Kouri M, Collan J, et al. Sparing of the submandibular glands by intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78:270–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chen TC, Lo WC, Ko JY, et al. Rare involvement of submandibular gland by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2009;31:877–81.PubMedCrossRef Chen TC, Lo WC, Ko JY, et al. Rare involvement of submandibular gland by oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2009;31:877–81.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Byeon HK, Lim YC, Koo BS, Choi EC. Metastasis to the submandibular gland in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: pathologic analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:96–100.PubMedCrossRef Byeon HK, Lim YC, Koo BS, Choi EC. Metastasis to the submandibular gland in oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: pathologic analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129:96–100.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Razfar A, Walvekar RR, Melkane A, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Incidence and patterns of regional metastasis in early oral squamous cell cancers: feasibility of submandibular gland preservation. Head Neck. 2009;31:1619–23.PubMedCrossRef Razfar A, Walvekar RR, Melkane A, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Incidence and patterns of regional metastasis in early oral squamous cell cancers: feasibility of submandibular gland preservation. Head Neck. 2009;31:1619–23.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Manual for Staging of Cancer. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Manual for Staging of Cancer. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
12.
go back to reference Fox PC, van der Ven PF, Sonies BC, Weiffenbach JM, Baum BJ. Xerostomia: evaluation of a symptom with increasing significance. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:519–25.PubMed Fox PC, van der Ven PF, Sonies BC, Weiffenbach JM, Baum BJ. Xerostomia: evaluation of a symptom with increasing significance. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:519–25.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Murdoch-Kinch CA, Kim HM, Vineberg KA, Ship JA, Eisbruch A. Dose-effect relationships for the submandibular salivary glands and implications for their sparing by intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:373–82.PubMedCrossRef Murdoch-Kinch CA, Kim HM, Vineberg KA, Ship JA, Eisbruch A. Dose-effect relationships for the submandibular salivary glands and implications for their sparing by intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:373–82.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jha N, Seikaly H, Harris J, et al. Phase III randomized study: oral pilocarpine versus submandibular salivary gland transfer protocol for the management of radiation-induced xerostomia. Head Neck. 2009;31:234–43.PubMedCrossRef Jha N, Seikaly H, Harris J, et al. Phase III randomized study: oral pilocarpine versus submandibular salivary gland transfer protocol for the management of radiation-induced xerostomia. Head Neck. 2009;31:234–43.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jaguar GC, Lima EN, Kowalski LP, et al. Impact of submandibular gland excision on salivary gland function in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:349–54.PubMedCrossRef Jaguar GC, Lima EN, Kowalski LP, et al. Impact of submandibular gland excision on salivary gland function in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2010;46:349–54.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Morbidity associated with removal of the submandibular gland. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992;20:216–9.PubMed Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Morbidity associated with removal of the submandibular gland. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992;20:216–9.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of Preservation of the Submandibular Gland During Neck Dissection in Patients With Early-Stage Oral Cancer
Authors
Tseng-Cheng Chen, MD
Pei-Jen Lou, MD, PhD
Jenq-Yuh Ko, MD, PhD
Tsung-Lin Yang, MD, PhD
Wu-Chia Lo, MD
Ya-Ling Hu, RN, MSc
Cheng-Ping Wang, MD
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1294-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2011 Go to the issue