Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Breast Oncology

Resection Margins in Ultrasound-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery

Authors: Oded Olsha, MB, BS, David Shemesh, MD, Moshe Carmon, MD, Ohn Sibirsky, MD, Ribhi Abu Dalo, MD, Louis Rivkin, MD, Itamar Ashkenazi, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Few published studies have shown the benefits of intraoperative ultrasound in avoiding inadequate margins in breast-conserving surgery. The aim of this study is to quantify intraoperative ultrasound margin size and assess its relationship to tumor size, multifocality, palpability, histology, and presence of intraductal component.

Methods

Patients with breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery in whom the operating surgeon visualized the tumor by ultrasound were included. Ultrasound margins measured intraoperatively were prospectively recorded and compared with pathology margins.

Results

Forty-five patients with 48 tumors were included. Twenty five patients (56%) had palpable tumors. Pathologic mean tumor size was 1.9 cm [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6–2.2 cm, range 0.5–4.8 cm]. There was good correlation between closest margins recorded by ultrasound and pathology margins (r = 0.4674, P < 0.0008). Fourteen patients (31%) had margins re-excised intraoperatively, 12 of them in the direction of the closest pathological margin. Three patients (7%), all of whom had intraoperative re-excision, had a second operation for involved margins without residual cancer on pathological examination of the reoperative specimens. Ultrasound margins ≥0.5 cm achieved adequate pathology margins of ≥0.2 cm in 95% of margins. Overestimation of pathology margins by ultrasound measurement was significantly affected by multifocality (P = 0.0473). Tumor size, palpability, invasive lobular histology, and presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) did not cause significant overestimation of pathology margins by ultrasound.

Conclusions

Intraoperative ultrasound may help maintain a low level of reoperation after breast-conserving surgery. Ultrasound margins <0.5 cm should be re-excised intraoperatively. Reliability of ultrasound in predicting the closest pathology margins was diminished in patients with multifocal tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yang SH, Yang KH, Li YP, et al. Breast conservation therapy for stage I or stage II breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1039–44.CrossRefPubMed Yang SH, Yang KH, Li YP, et al. Breast conservation therapy for stage I or stage II breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1039–44.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiation Biol Phys. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiation Biol Phys. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.CrossRefPubMed Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Leong C, Boyages J, Jayasinghe UW, et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100:1823–32.CrossRefPubMed Leong C, Boyages J, Jayasinghe UW, et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100:1823–32.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Anscher MS, Jones P, Prosnitz LR, et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:22–8.CrossRefPubMed Anscher MS, Jones P, Prosnitz LR, et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:22–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ghossein NA, Alpert S, Barba J, et al. Breast cancer. Importance of adequate surgical excision prior to radiotherapy in the local control of breast cancer in patients treated conservatively. Arch Surg. 1992;127:411–5.PubMed Ghossein NA, Alpert S, Barba J, et al. Breast cancer. Importance of adequate surgical excision prior to radiotherapy in the local control of breast cancer in patients treated conservatively. Arch Surg. 1992;127:411–5.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Ooi CW, Serpell JW, Rodger A. Tumour involvement of the re-excision specimen following clear local excision of breast cancer with positive margins. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:973–4.CrossRef Ooi CW, Serpell JW, Rodger A. Tumour involvement of the re-excision specimen following clear local excision of breast cancer with positive margins. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:973–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jenkinson AD, Al-Mufti RA, Mohsen Y, Berry MJ, Wells C, Carpenter R. Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:515.CrossRef Jenkinson AD, Al-Mufti RA, Mohsen Y, Berry MJ, Wells C, Carpenter R. Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:515.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heimann R, Powers C, Halpem HJ, et al. Breast preservation in stage I and II carcinoma of the breast. The University of Chicago experience. Cancer. 1996;78:1722–30.CrossRefPubMed Heimann R, Powers C, Halpem HJ, et al. Breast preservation in stage I and II carcinoma of the breast. The University of Chicago experience. Cancer. 1996;78:1722–30.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ, Goodman RL. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:521–2.CrossRef Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ, Goodman RL. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:521–2.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–1675.PubMed Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–1675.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Dooley WC, Parker J. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins. Am J Surg. 2005;190:606–8.CrossRefPubMed Dooley WC, Parker J. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins. Am J Surg. 2005;190:606–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ohsumi S, Sakamoto G, Takashima S, et al. Long-term results of breast-conserving treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Japanese Women from multicenter investigation. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:61–7.CrossRefPubMed Ohsumi S, Sakamoto G, Takashima S, et al. Long-term results of breast-conserving treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Japanese Women from multicenter investigation. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:61–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Renton SC, Gazet JC, Ford HT, Corbishley C, Sutcliffe R. The importance of the resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22:17–22.CrossRefPubMed Renton SC, Gazet JC, Ford HT, Corbishley C, Sutcliffe R. The importance of the resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22:17–22.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Spivack B, Khanna MM, Tafra L, Juillard G, Giuliano AE. Margin status and local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Arch Surg. 1994;129:952–6.PubMed Spivack B, Khanna MM, Tafra L, Juillard G, Giuliano AE. Margin status and local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Arch Surg. 1994;129:952–6.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Obedian E, Haffty BG. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6:28–33.PubMed Obedian E, Haffty BG. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6:28–33.PubMed
17.
go back to reference DiBiase ST, Komarnicky LT, Heron DE, Schwartz GF, Mansfield CM. Influence of radiation dose on positive surgical margins in women undergoing breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:680–6.CrossRefPubMed DiBiase ST, Komarnicky LT, Heron DE, Schwartz GF, Mansfield CM. Influence of radiation dose on positive surgical margins in women undergoing breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:680–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, Kelley MC. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–8.PubMed Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, Kelley MC. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–8.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ Jr. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.CrossRefPubMed Gibson GR, Lesnikoski B, Yoo J, Mott LA, Cady B, Barth RJ Jr. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:693–704.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.CrossRefPubMed Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Keller MD, Majumder SK, Kelley MC, Meszoely IM, Boulos FI, Olivares GM, et al. Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and spectral imaging for breast surgical margin analysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42:15–23.CrossRefPubMed Keller MD, Majumder SK, Kelley MC, Meszoely IM, Boulos FI, Olivares GM, et al. Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and spectral imaging for breast surgical margin analysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42:15–23.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):483–9.CrossRefPubMed Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):483–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Harlow Sp, Krag DN, Ames SE, Weaver DL. Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of non-palpable breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:241–6.CrossRef Harlow Sp, Krag DN, Ames SE, Weaver DL. Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of non-palpable breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:241–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Moore MM, Whitney LA, Cerilli L, Imbrie JZ, Bunch M, Simpson VB, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2001;233:761–8.CrossRefPubMed Moore MM, Whitney LA, Cerilli L, Imbrie JZ, Bunch M, Simpson VB, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2001;233:761–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Smith LF, Rubio IT, Henry-Tillman R, Korourian S, Klimber VS. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:419–23.CrossRefPubMed Smith LF, Rubio IT, Henry-Tillman R, Korourian S, Klimber VS. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:419–23.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Azu M, Abrahamse P, Katz SJ, Jagsi R, Morrow M. What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:558–63.CrossRefPubMed Azu M, Abrahamse P, Katz SJ, Jagsi R, Morrow M. What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Surgeon attitudes and correlates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:558–63.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:333–9.CrossRefPubMed Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:333–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.CrossRefPubMed Cochrane RA, Valasiadou P, Wilson AR, Al-Ghazal SK, Macmillan RD. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1505–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ngô C, Pollet AG, Laperrelle J, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2485–9.CrossRefPubMed Ngô C, Pollet AG, Laperrelle J, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2485–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yeap BH, Muniandy S, Lee SK, Sabaratnam S, Singh M. Specimen shrinkage and its influence on margin assessment in breast cancer. Asian J Surg. 2007;30:183–7.CrossRefPubMed Yeap BH, Muniandy S, Lee SK, Sabaratnam S, Singh M. Specimen shrinkage and its influence on margin assessment in breast cancer. Asian J Surg. 2007;30:183–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Bozzini A, Renne G, Meneghetti L, et al. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:275.CrossRefPubMed Bozzini A, Renne G, Meneghetti L, et al. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:275.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Resection Margins in Ultrasound-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery
Authors
Oded Olsha, MB, BS
David Shemesh, MD
Moshe Carmon, MD
Ohn Sibirsky, MD
Ribhi Abu Dalo, MD
Louis Rivkin, MD
Itamar Ashkenazi, MD
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1280-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2011 Go to the issue