Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2010

01-10-2010 | Breast Oncology

Margin Index: A New Method for Prediction of Residual Disease After Breast-Conserving Surgery

Authors: Julie A. Margenthaler, MD, Feng Gao, PhD, V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We hypothesized that the optimum margin after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) should depend on the original size of the tumor. We propose that “margin index”—a relationship of the margin obtained to the size of the tumor—is a better predictor of residual disease on reexcision than margin alone.

Methods

We identified 475 consecutive patients with Stage I-II breast cancer, with or without ductal carcinoma in situ, who were treated with BCT from 1998–2008 who also underwent reexcision for close margins. Margin index was calculated as follows: margin index = closest margin (mm)/tumor size (mm) × 100. A receiver operating curve was created using the derived margin index and the presence or absence of residual disease in the reexcision specimen. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at various margin indices to determine the optimum margin index.

Results

Of the 475 patients, 102 (21%) had residual disease in the reexcision specimen. The optimum margin index was >5; the risk of residual disease for a margin index >5 was only 3.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of a margin index cutoff of 5 was 85 and 73%, respectively. The overall c index for the receiver operating curve was 0.88. The margin index was the only factor predictive of residual disease in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Margin index is a reliable method for the prediction of residual disease after attempted BCT with close margins. This simple calculation may be helpful for identifying patients who require reexcision before radiation therapy and those who may be able to forego additional surgical interventions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jacobson J, Danforth D, Cowan K, et al. Ten-year results of the National Cancer Institute’s randomized trial of breast conservation versus mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed Jacobson J, Danforth D, Cowan K, et al. Ten-year results of the National Cancer Institute’s randomized trial of breast conservation versus mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907–11.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Van Dongen J, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed Van Dongen J, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life table analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992;11:19–26.PubMed Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Anderson JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life table analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992;11:19–26.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, et al. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with fifteen years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1558–64.PubMed Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, et al. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with fifteen years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1558–64.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jobsen JJ, Van Der Palen J, Ong F, et al. The value of a positive margin for invasive carcinoma in breast-conservative treatment in relation to local recurrence is limited to young women only. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:724–31.PubMed Jobsen JJ, Van Der Palen J, Ong F, et al. The value of a positive margin for invasive carcinoma in breast-conservative treatment in relation to local recurrence is limited to young women only. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:724–31.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kurtz J, Jacquiemier J, Amalric R, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg. 1990;212:38–44.CrossRefPubMed Kurtz J, Jacquiemier J, Amalric R, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg. 1990;212:38–44.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bedwinek JM, Perez CA, Kramer S, et al. Irradiation as the primary management of stage I and II adenocarcinoma of the breast. Cancer Clin Trials. 1980;3:11–8.PubMed Bedwinek JM, Perez CA, Kramer S, et al. Irradiation as the primary management of stage I and II adenocarcinoma of the breast. Cancer Clin Trials. 1980;3:11–8.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.CrossRefPubMed Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383–93.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–75.PubMed Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1668–75.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.PubMed Freedman G, Fowble B, Hanlon A, et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:1005–15.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ, et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:279–87.PubMed Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ, et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:279–87.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Touboul E, Buffat L, Belkacemi Y, et al. Local recurrences and distant metastases after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;43:25–38. Touboul E, Buffat L, Belkacemi Y, et al. Local recurrences and distant metastases after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;43:25–38.
15.
go back to reference Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81–5.CrossRefPubMed Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Magee B, Swindell R, Harris M, et al. Prognostic factors for breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: results from a randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 1996;39:223–7.CrossRefPubMed Magee B, Swindell R, Harris M, et al. Prognostic factors for breast recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: results from a randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 1996;39:223–7.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2005;241:629–39.CrossRefPubMed Taghian A, Mohiuddin M, Jagsi R, et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2005;241:629–39.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF, et al. Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and the prognosis for patients with stage I and II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:888–94.PubMed Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF, et al. Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and the prognosis for patients with stage I and II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:888–94.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, et al. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.CrossRefPubMed Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, et al. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004;188:399–402.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:134–40.CrossRefPubMed Miller AR, Brandao G, Prihoda TJ, et al. Positive margins following surgical resection of breast carcinoma: analysis of pathologic correlates. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:134–40.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mazouni C, Rouzier R, Balleyguier C, et al. Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:789–96.CrossRefPubMed Mazouni C, Rouzier R, Balleyguier C, et al. Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol. 2006;61:789–96.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Fortunato L, Penteriani R, Farina M, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective and preferable technique to localize non-palpable breast tumors. EJSO. 2008;34:1289–92.PubMed Fortunato L, Penteriani R, Farina M, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound is an effective and preferable technique to localize non-palpable breast tumors. EJSO. 2008;34:1289–92.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Thompson M, Henry-Tillman R, Margulies A, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:148–56.CrossRefPubMed Thompson M, Henry-Tillman R, Margulies A, et al. Hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:148–56.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, et al. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. EJSO. 1999;25:464–9.CrossRefPubMed Malik HZ, George WD, Mallon EA, et al. Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. EJSO. 1999;25:464–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Janes SEJ, Stankhe M, Singh S, et al. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2006;15:326–30.CrossRefPubMed Janes SEJ, Stankhe M, Singh S, et al. Systematic cavity shaves reduces close margins and re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2006;15:326–30.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, et al. Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Path. 2008;21:39–45.CrossRef Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, et al. Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Path. 2008;21:39–45.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.
Metadata
Title
Margin Index: A New Method for Prediction of Residual Disease After Breast-Conserving Surgery
Authors
Julie A. Margenthaler, MD
Feng Gao, PhD
V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1079-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2010 Go to the issue