Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2010

01-03-2010 | Reconstructive Oncology

Computer-Based Learning Module Increases Shared Decision Making in Breast Reconstruction

Authors: Bernard T. Lee, MD, FACS, Chen Chen, MS, Janet H. Yueh, MD, Minh-Doan Nguyen, MD, PhD, Samuel J. Lin, MD, Adam M. Tobias, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shared decision making (SDM) combines evidence-based medicine with individual patient preferences. Patients who are actively engaged in their own health care management with their physicians have been shown to experience not only increased compliance, but also higher satisfaction and better outcomes. We hypothesize that a computer-based learning module for breast reconstruction increases patient involvement in the decision-making process.

Materials and Methods

Women who underwent either immediate or delayed breast reconstruction at an academic teaching hospital from 2004 to 2007 were identified. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were mailed questionnaires on demographics, informational resources, and decision-making processes. Questionnaire results were divided into 2 groups for analysis: patients who received a standard surgeon consultation and patients who were shown a computer-based decision aid in addition to the standard consultation.

Results

There were 358 women eligible for our study. A total of 255 patients (75.9%) responded to the survey; 168 patients were shown the computer-based decision aid and 87 patients were not. Patients who used the computer-based learning module reported a greater role in choosing the type of reconstruction (P < .001). Additionally, these patients reported a greater number of reconstructive options offered to them (P < .001) and were more satisfied with the amount of information provided by their reconstructive surgeon (P = .049).

Conclusions

A computer-based learning module allows patients to assimilate information and actively participate in choosing type of breast reconstruction. Use of this educational modality represents a simple and effective way to improve the shared decision-making process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295:387–8.CrossRefPubMed Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295:387–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983;1:459–62.CrossRefPubMed Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983;1:459–62.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. How to improve communication between doctors and patients. Learning more about the decision making context is important. BMJ. 2000;320:1220–1.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. How to improve communication between doctors and patients. Learning more about the decision making context is important. BMJ. 2000;320:1220–1.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:112–21.PubMed Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:112–21.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Coulter A. Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:S15–6.CrossRefPubMed Coulter A. Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:S15–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335:24–7.CrossRefPubMed Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335:24–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319:766–71.PubMed Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319:766–71.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kaplan RM. Shared medical decision making. A new tool for preventive medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:81–3.CrossRefPubMed Kaplan RM. Shared medical decision making. A new tool for preventive medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:81–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, Coates RC, Lee NC, Mullen P, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.CrossRefPubMed Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, Coates RC, Lee NC, Mullen P, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Goodwin PJ, Black JT, Bordeleau LJ, Ganz PA. Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer–taking stock. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:263–81.PubMedCrossRef Goodwin PJ, Black JT, Bordeleau LJ, Ganz PA. Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer–taking stock. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:263–81.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Andersen MR, Bowen DJ, Morea J, Stein KD, Baker F. Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life. Health Psychol. 2009;28:29–37.CrossRefPubMed Andersen MR, Bowen DJ, Morea J, Stein KD, Baker F. Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life. Health Psychol. 2009;28:29–37.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Keating NL, Weeks JC, Borbas C, Guadagnoli E. Treatment of early stage breast cancer: do surgeons and patients agree regarding whether treatment alternatives were discussed? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;79:225–31.CrossRefPubMed Keating NL, Weeks JC, Borbas C, Guadagnoli E. Treatment of early stage breast cancer: do surgeons and patients agree regarding whether treatment alternatives were discussed? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;79:225–31.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1473–9.CrossRefPubMed Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1473–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hawley S, Alderman AK, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Patient satisfaction with treatment of breast cancer: does surgeon specialization matter? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3694–8.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Hawley S, Alderman AK, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Patient satisfaction with treatment of breast cancer: does surgeon specialization matter? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3694–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.CrossRefPubMed Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O’Connor AM, Biggs J, Drake E, Yetsir E, Hart RG. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:737–43.CrossRefPubMed Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O’Connor AM, Biggs J, Drake E, Yetsir E, Hart RG. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:737–43.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1067–73.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1067–73.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Villasis-Keever M, Gafni A, Charles C, Roberts R, et al. Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:974–85.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Villasis-Keever M, Gafni A, Charles C, Roberts R, et al. Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:974–85.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, Gafni A, Sanders K, Mirsky D, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:435–41.CrossRefPubMed Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, Gafni A, Sanders K, Mirsky D, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:435–41.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ. 1990;301:575–80.CrossRefPubMed Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ. 1990;301:575–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Clauson J, Hsieh YC, Acharya S, Rademaker AW, Morrow M. Results of the Lynn Sage Second-Opinion Program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Changes in management and determinants of where care is delivered. Cancer. 2002;94:889–94.CrossRefPubMed Clauson J, Hsieh YC, Acharya S, Rademaker AW, Morrow M. Results of the Lynn Sage Second-Opinion Program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Changes in management and determinants of where care is delivered. Cancer. 2002;94:889–94.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Liang W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH, Meropol NJ, Eggert L, Hwang YT, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1008–16.CrossRefPubMed Liang W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH, Meropol NJ, Eggert L, Hwang YT, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1008–16.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, Mujahid M, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:489–94.CrossRefPubMed Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, Mujahid M, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:489–94.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, et al. Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104:2340–6.CrossRefPubMed Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, et al. Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104:2340–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, Ottesen RA, Hughes ME, Theriault R, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg. 2006;243:241–9.CrossRefPubMed Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, Ottesen RA, Hughes ME, Theriault R, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg. 2006;243:241–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Bar-Meir ED, Merali HS, Houlihan MJ, Gautam S, et al. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:246–54.CrossRefPubMed Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Bar-Meir ED, Merali HS, Houlihan MJ, Gautam S, et al. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:246–54.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Yermilov I, Chow W, Devgan L, Makary MA, Ko CY. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:580–6.CrossRefPubMed Yermilov I, Chow W, Devgan L, Makary MA, Ko CY. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:580–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Moumjid N, Gafni A, Bremond A, Carrere MO. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:539–46.CrossRefPubMed Moumjid N, Gafni A, Bremond A, Carrere MO. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:539–46.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Mulley AG, Jr., Wennberg JE. Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:570–1.PubMed O’Connor AM, Mulley AG, Jr., Wennberg JE. Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:570–1.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Graham ID, Logan J, O’Connor A, Weeks KE, Aaron S, Cranney A, et al. A qualitative study of physicians’ perceptions of three decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:279–83.CrossRefPubMed Graham ID, Logan J, O’Connor A, Weeks KE, Aaron S, Cranney A, et al. A qualitative study of physicians’ perceptions of three decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:279–83.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ. Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:717–24.CrossRefPubMed Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ. Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:717–24.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Computer-Based Learning Module Increases Shared Decision Making in Breast Reconstruction
Authors
Bernard T. Lee, MD, FACS
Chen Chen, MS
Janet H. Yueh, MD
Minh-Doan Nguyen, MD, PhD
Samuel J. Lin, MD
Adam M. Tobias, MD
Publication date
01-03-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0869-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2010 Go to the issue