Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2010

Open Access 01-04-2010 | Translational Research and Biomarkers

KRAS Mutation in Colon Cancer: A Marker of Resistance to EGFR-I Therapy

Authors: Ahmad D. Siddiqui, MD, Bilal Piperdi, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and Design

The introduction of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-I) has increased the treatment options available for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Two EGFR-I agents currently approved for the treatment of mCRC are the fully human monoclonal antibody panitumumab and the mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibody cetuximab. While these agents have demonstrated activity across multiple lines of therapy, early studies suggested that clinical benefit was confined to a subset of patients treated. Mutation of the KRAS oncogene has emerged as a powerful negative predictive biomarker to identify patients with mCRC who do not benefit from EGFR-I therapy. Multiple retrospective analyses have demonstrated that clinical benefit from treatment with EGFR-I is limited to patients with tumors harboring the wild-type KRAS gene. In this review, the KRAS pathway and studies evaluating KRAS as a prognostic marker in CRC are discussed along with advances in KRAS gene mutation testing. Clinical trials evaluating the role of KRAS status in response to EGFR-I monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy are also highlighted along with ongoing studies evaluating the role of EGFR-I treatment on curative resections rates.

Results and Conclusion

Future studies investigating EGFR-I therapy in mCRC should incorporate KRAS mutation testing into the study protocol in order to more accurately determine the patient population that will obtain clinical benefit from these novel agents.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Veronsese ML, Sun W, Giantonio B, et al. A phase II trial of gefitinib with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:1846–9.CrossRef Veronsese ML, Sun W, Giantonio B, et al. A phase II trial of gefitinib with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:1846–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Townsley CA, Major P, Siu LL, et al. Phase II study of erlotinib (OSI-774) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1136–43.CrossRefPubMed Townsley CA, Major P, Siu LL, et al. Phase II study of erlotinib (OSI-774) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1136–43.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Erbitux (cetuximab) [prescribing information]. Branchburg, NJ: ImClone Systems Inc; revised November 2008. Erbitux (cetuximab) [prescribing information]. Branchburg, NJ: ImClone Systems Inc; revised November 2008.
5.
go back to reference Vectibix (panitumumab) [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; revised February 2009. Vectibix (panitumumab) [prescribing information]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; revised February 2009.
6.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–45.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:337–45.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, et al. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2040–8.CrossRefPubMed Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, et al. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2040–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1658–64.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1658–64.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mitchell EP, Perez-Soler R, Van Cutsem E, Lacouture ME. Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of EGFRI dermatologic toxicities. Oncology (Williston Park). 2007;21(11 Suppl 5):4–9. Mitchell EP, Perez-Soler R, Van Cutsem E, Lacouture ME. Clinical presentation and pathophysiology of EGFRI dermatologic toxicities. Oncology (Williston Park). 2007;21(11 Suppl 5):4–9.
10.
go back to reference Tejpar S, Piessevaux H, Claes K, et al. Magnesium wasting associated with epidermal-growth-factor receptor-targeting antibodies in colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:387–94.CrossRefPubMed Tejpar S, Piessevaux H, Claes K, et al. Magnesium wasting associated with epidermal-growth-factor receptor-targeting antibodies in colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:387–94.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Schubbert S, Shannon K, Bollag G. Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:295–308.CrossRefPubMed Schubbert S, Shannon K, Bollag G. Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:295–308.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–5.CrossRefPubMed Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, et al. Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2643–8.CrossRefPubMed Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, et al. Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2643–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, et al. KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:508–15.CrossRefPubMed De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, et al. KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:508–15.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Finocchiaro G, Cappuzzo F, Janne PA, et al. EGFR, HER2 and Kras as predictive factors for cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:168s. Finocchiaro G, Cappuzzo F, Janne PA, et al. EGFR, HER2 and Kras as predictive factors for cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:168s.
17.
go back to reference Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:374–9.CrossRefPubMed Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:374–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Khambata-Ford S, Garrett CR, Meropol NJ, et al. Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3230–7.CrossRefPubMed Khambata-Ford S, Garrett CR, Meropol NJ, et al. Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3230–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Freeman DJ, Juan T, Reiner M, et al. Association of K-ras mutational status and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving panitumumab alone. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2008;7:184–90.CrossRefPubMed Freeman DJ, Juan T, Reiner M, et al. Association of K-ras mutational status and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving panitumumab alone. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2008;7:184–90.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Benhattar J, Losi L, Chaubert P, et al. Prognostic significance of K-ras mutations in colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1044–8.PubMed Benhattar J, Losi L, Chaubert P, et al. Prognostic significance of K-ras mutations in colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1044–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Lee JC, Wang ST, Lai MD, et al. K-ras gene mutation is a useful predictor of the survival of early stage colorectal cancers. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:3839–44.PubMed Lee JC, Wang ST, Lai MD, et al. K-ras gene mutation is a useful predictor of the survival of early stage colorectal cancers. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:3839–44.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4830–5.CrossRefPubMed Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4830–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–65.CrossRefPubMed Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–65.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626–34.CrossRefPubMed Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1626–34.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cohn AL, Smith DA, Neubauer A, et al. Results from panitumumab (pmab) regimen evaluation in colorectal cancer to estimate primary response to treatment (PRECEPT): second-line treatment with pmab and FOLFIRI by tumor KRAS status. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:184s.CrossRef Cohn AL, Smith DA, Neubauer A, et al. Results from panitumumab (pmab) regimen evaluation in colorectal cancer to estimate primary response to treatment (PRECEPT): second-line treatment with pmab and FOLFIRI by tumor KRAS status. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:184s.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:663–71.CrossRefPubMed Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:663–71.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Kohene C-H, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–17.CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Kohene C-H, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1408–17.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–32.PubMedCrossRef Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–32.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rak J, Mitsuhashi Y, Bayko L, et al. Mutant ras oncogenes upregulate VEGF/VPF expression: implications for induction and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4575–80.PubMed Rak J, Mitsuhashi Y, Bayko L, et al. Mutant ras oncogenes upregulate VEGF/VPF expression: implications for induction and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4575–80.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Esteller M, Gonzalez S, Risques RA, et al. K-ras and p16 aberrations confer poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:299–304.PubMed Esteller M, Gonzalez S, Risques RA, et al. K-ras and p16 aberrations confer poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:299–304.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Westra JL, Schaapveld M, Hollema H, et al. Determination of TP53 mutation is more relevant than microsatellite instability status for the prediction of disease-free survival in adjuvant-treated stage III colon cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5635–43.CrossRefPubMed Westra JL, Schaapveld M, Hollema H, et al. Determination of TP53 mutation is more relevant than microsatellite instability status for the prediction of disease-free survival in adjuvant-treated stage III colon cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5635–43.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Samowitz WS, Holden JA, Curtin K, et al. Inverse relationship between microsatellite instability and K-ras and p53 gene alterations in colon cancer. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1517–24.PubMed Samowitz WS, Holden JA, Curtin K, et al. Inverse relationship between microsatellite instability and K-ras and p53 gene alterations in colon cancer. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1517–24.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Juan T, Suggs S, Wolf M, et al. A comparability study of 4 commercial KRAS tests (abstract 1811). Paper presented at: 99th AACR Annual Meeting; 2008; San Diego, CA. Juan T, Suggs S, Wolf M, et al. A comparability study of 4 commercial KRAS tests (abstract 1811). Paper presented at: 99th AACR Annual Meeting; 2008; San Diego, CA.
35.
go back to reference Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Sommerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2091–6.CrossRefPubMed Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Sommerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2091–6.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference van Krieken JH, Jung A, Kirchner T, et al. KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch. 2009;453:417–31.CrossRef van Krieken JH, Jung A, Kirchner T, et al. KRAS mutation testing for predicting response to anti-EGFR therapy for colorectal carcinoma: proposal for an European quality assurance program. Virchows Arch. 2009;453:417–31.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ahnen DJ, Feigl P, Quan G, et al. Ki-ras mutation and p53 overexpression predict the clinical behavior of colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1149–58.PubMed Ahnen DJ, Feigl P, Quan G, et al. Ki-ras mutation and p53 overexpression predict the clinical behavior of colorectal cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1149–58.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Russo A, Bazan V, Agnese V, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer: Kirsten Ras in CRC (RASCAL) and TP53CRC collaborative studies. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 4):44–9.CrossRefPubMed Russo A, Bazan V, Agnese V, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer: Kirsten Ras in CRC (RASCAL) and TP53CRC collaborative studies. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(Suppl 4):44–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Bouzourene H, Gervaz P, Cerottini JP, et al. p53 and K-ras as prognostic factors for Dukes’ stage B colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1008–15.CrossRefPubMed Bouzourene H, Gervaz P, Cerottini JP, et al. p53 and K-ras as prognostic factors for Dukes’ stage B colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1008–15.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Hurwitz HI, Yi J, Ince W, et al. The clinical benefit of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer is independent of K-ras mutation status: analysis of a phase III study of bevacizumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2009;14:22–8.CrossRefPubMed Hurwitz HI, Yi J, Ince W, et al. The clinical benefit of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer is independent of K-ras mutation status: analysis of a phase III study of bevacizumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2009;14:22–8.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Mitchell EP, LaCouture M, Shearer H, et al. Final STEPP results of prophylactic versus reactive skin toxicity (ST) treatment (tx) for panitumumab (pmab)-related ST in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:805s.CrossRef Mitchell EP, LaCouture M, Shearer H, et al. Final STEPP results of prophylactic versus reactive skin toxicity (ST) treatment (tx) for panitumumab (pmab)-related ST in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:805s.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Hartmann JT, et al. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or cetuximab plus FOLFIRI as neoadjuvant treatment of nonresectable colorectal liver metastases: a randomized multicenter study (CELIM-study). Paper presented at: 2009 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; January 15–17, 2009; San Francisco, CA. Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Hartmann JT, et al. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or cetuximab plus FOLFIRI as neoadjuvant treatment of nonresectable colorectal liver metastases: a randomized multicenter study (CELIM-study). Paper presented at: 2009 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; January 15–17, 2009; San Francisco, CA.
43.
go back to reference Siena S, Tabernero J, Burkes RL, et al. Phase III study (PRIME/20050203) of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFOX compared with FOLFOX alone in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): pooled safety data. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:186s. Siena S, Tabernero J, Burkes RL, et al. Phase III study (PRIME/20050203) of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFOX compared with FOLFOX alone in patients (pts) with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): pooled safety data. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:186s.
44.
go back to reference Peeters M, Wilson G, Ducreux M, et al. Phase III study (20050181) of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): pooled safety results. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:194s. Peeters M, Wilson G, Ducreux M, et al. Phase III study (20050181) of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): pooled safety results. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:194s.
45.
go back to reference Hecht JR, Mitchell E, Chidiac T, et al. A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:672–80.CrossRefPubMed Hecht JR, Mitchell E, Chidiac T, et al. A randomized phase IIIB trial of chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and panitumumab compared with chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:672–80.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Tol J, Koopman M, Cats A, et al. Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:563–72.CrossRefPubMed Tol J, Koopman M, Cats A, et al. Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:563–72.CrossRefPubMed
47.
49.
go back to reference Loupakis F, Ruzzo A, Cremolini C, et al. KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:715–21.CrossRefPubMed Loupakis F, Ruzzo A, Cremolini C, et al. KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:715–21.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Sartore-Bianchi A, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1857–7.CrossRef Sartore-Bianchi A, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1857–7.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5705–12.CrossRefPubMed Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5705–12.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Prenen H, De Schutter J, Jacobs B, et al. PIK3CA mutations are not a major determinant of resistance to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3184–8.CrossRefPubMed Prenen H, De Schutter J, Jacobs B, et al. PIK3CA mutations are not a major determinant of resistance to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3184–8.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Jonker DJ, Karapetis C, Harbison C, et al. High epiregulin (EREG) plus K-ras (WT) status as predictors of cetuximab benefit in the treatments of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): results from NCIC CTG CO.17—a phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:172s. Jonker DJ, Karapetis C, Harbison C, et al. High epiregulin (EREG) plus K-ras (WT) status as predictors of cetuximab benefit in the treatments of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): results from NCIC CTG CO.17—a phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:172s.
Metadata
Title
KRAS Mutation in Colon Cancer: A Marker of Resistance to EGFR-I Therapy
Authors
Ahmad D. Siddiqui, MD
Bilal Piperdi, MD
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0811-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2010 Go to the issue