Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2009

01-10-2009 | Pancreatic Tumors

Laparoscopic Left Pancreatectomy: Complication Risk Score Correlates With Morbidity and Risk for Pancreatic Fistula

Authors: Sharon M. Weber, MD, Clifford S. Cho, MD, Nipun Merchant, MD, Scott Pinchot, MD, Robert Rettammel, MA, Atilla Nakeeb, MD, David Bentrem, MD, Alex Parikh, MD, Ashley E. Mazo, BS, Robert C. G. Martin III, MD, PhD, Charles R. Scoggins, MD, MBA, Syed A. Ahmad, MD, Hong Jin Kim, MD, Nicholas Hamilton, MD, William Hawkins, MD, C. Max Schmidt, MD, David A. Kooby, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgeons are performing laparoscopic left pancreatectomy (LLP) with increasing frequency; however, determinants of perioperative outcome after LLP are not well defined. We evaluated factors contributing to morbidity after LLP.

Methods

Records from patients undergoing LLP from 2000 to 2008 from nine academic medical centers were evaluated to assess risk factors for perioperative complications. Extent of pancreatic resection was determined by the length of the gross pancreatic specimen. Complications and pancreatic fistula rates were assessed, and a model was developed to identify those at risk of postoperative adverse events.

Results

Among the 219 LLP cases, indications were cystic neoplasms in 122 (56%), solid neoplasms in 83 (38%), and chronic pancreatitis in 14 (6%). Thirty-day morbidity and mortality were 39% and 0, respectively. Major complications occurred in 11%. Pancreatic fistulae were detected in 23%, with clinically important fistulae (International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition grade B/C) seen in 10%. On multivariate analysis, only greater estimated blood loss (EBL), higher body mass index (BMI), and longer length of resected pancreas were associated with major complications. A complication risk score consisting of 1 point each for BMI >27, pancreatic specimen length >8 cm, or EBL ≥150 mL predicted an increased risk of complications and pancreatic fistulae.

Conclusions

The risk of major complications after LLP is 11%, with clinically important pancreatic fistulae occurring in 10%. A complication risk score incorporating BMI, extent of pancreatic resection, and EBL correlates with all end points evaluated. The complication risk score should be used when quality outcome measures are evaluated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg. 2008;248:438–46.PubMed Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg. 2008;248:438–46.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.CrossRefPubMed Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280:1747–51.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Riall TS, Reddy DM, Nealon WH, et al. The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2008;248:459–67.PubMed Riall TS, Reddy DM, Nealon WH, et al. The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2008;248:459–67.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Riall TS, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS, et al. Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers. Surgery. 2008;144:133–40.CrossRefPubMed Riall TS, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS, et al. Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers. Surgery. 2008;144:133–40.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rodriguez JR, Madanat MG, Healy BC, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation revisited. Surgery. 2007;141:619–25.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez JR, Madanat MG, Healy BC, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation revisited. Surgery. 2007;141:619–25.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.PubMed
9.
go back to reference DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931–7.CrossRefPubMed DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Martin RC, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2002;235:803–13.CrossRefPubMed Martin RC, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg. 2002;235:803–13.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Clavien PA, et al. Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure. Surgery. 2007;141:420–6.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Clavien PA, et al. Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure. Surgery. 2007;141:420–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mullen JT, Davenport DL, Hutter MM, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2164–72.CrossRefPubMed Mullen JT, Davenport DL, Hutter MM, et al. Impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2164–72.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ, et al. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:270–8.CrossRefPubMed House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ, et al. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:270–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sledzianowski JF, Duffas JP, Muscari F, et al. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2005;137:180–5.CrossRefPubMed Sledzianowski JF, Duffas JP, Muscari F, et al. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2005;137:180–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1691–7.CrossRefPubMed Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1691–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lermite E, Pessaux P, Brehant O, et al. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:588–96.CrossRefPubMed Lermite E, Pessaux P, Brehant O, et al. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:588–96.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vin Y, Sima CS, Getrajdman GI, et al. Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:490–8.CrossRefPubMed Vin Y, Sima CS, Getrajdman GI, et al. Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:490–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bentrem DJ, Yeh JJ, Brennan MF, et al. Predictors of intensive care unit admission and related outcome for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1307–12.CrossRefPubMed Bentrem DJ, Yeh JJ, Brennan MF, et al. Predictors of intensive care unit admission and related outcome for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1307–12.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:951–9.CrossRefPubMed Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:951–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2008;143:956–65.CrossRefPubMed Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, et al. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2008;143:956–65.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1058–64.CrossRefPubMed Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1058–64.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kim W, Song KY, Lee HJ, et al. The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg. 2008;248:793–9.CrossRefPubMed Kim W, Song KY, Lee HJ, et al. The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg. 2008;248:793–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Yamada H, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, et al. Effect of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy—comparison with open distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:997–1004.CrossRefPubMed Yamada H, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, et al. Effect of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy—comparison with open distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:997–1004.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc Other Intervent Tech. 2002;16:855–8. Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc Other Intervent Tech. 2002;16:855–8.
25.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Madboulay K, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:558–61.CrossRefPubMed Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Madboulay K, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:558–61.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, McNevin MS. Results of a technique of pancreaticojejunostomy that optimizes blood supply to the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:591–6.CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, McNevin MS. Results of a technique of pancreaticojejunostomy that optimizes blood supply to the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:591–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245:573–82.CrossRefPubMed Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245:573–82.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, et al. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy—predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1071–6.CrossRefPubMed Pannegeon V, Pessaux P, Sauvanet A, et al. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy—predictive risk factors and value of conservative treatment. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1071–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:237–41.CrossRefPubMed Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, et al. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:237–41.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM Jr. Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:163–73.CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM Jr. Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:163–73.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Left Pancreatectomy: Complication Risk Score Correlates With Morbidity and Risk for Pancreatic Fistula
Authors
Sharon M. Weber, MD
Clifford S. Cho, MD
Nipun Merchant, MD
Scott Pinchot, MD
Robert Rettammel, MA
Atilla Nakeeb, MD
David Bentrem, MD
Alex Parikh, MD
Ashley E. Mazo, BS
Robert C. G. Martin III, MD, PhD
Charles R. Scoggins, MD, MBA
Syed A. Ahmad, MD
Hong Jin Kim, MD
Nicholas Hamilton, MD
William Hawkins, MD
C. Max Schmidt, MD
David A. Kooby, MD
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0597-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2009 Go to the issue