Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2008

01-07-2008 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Predictors of Multivisceral Resection in Patients with Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Authors: Anand Govindarajan, MD, MSc, Novlette Fraser, MA, Vanessa Cranford, MD, Debrah Wirtzfeld, MD, Steve Gallinger, MD, Calvin H. L. Law, MD, MPH, Andrew J. Smith, MD, MSc, Anna R. Gagliardi, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Practice guidelines recommend en bloc multivisceral resection (MVR) for all involved organs in patients with locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer (LAACRC) to reduce local recurrence and improve survival. We found that MVR was performed in one-third of eligible American patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry but that study could not identify factors amenable to quality improvement. This study was conducted to examine rates, and predictors of MVR among Canadian patients with LAACRC.

Methods

Rates of MVR were examined by observational study. Eligible patients were aged 20–74 years who had surgery for nonmetastatic LAACRC from July 1997 to December 2000. Patient, tumor, surgeon, and hospital characteristics were extracted from medical records. Summary statistics were compared by type of surgery (MVR, partial MVR, standard resection). To identify factors associated with MVR we analyzed operative notes and transcripts from interviews with general surgeons using standard qualitative methods.

Results

Factors associated with MVR included fewer years in practice, preoperative treatment planning, involvement of surgical consultants, and access to diagnostic imaging and systems to enable preoperative multidisciplinary planning. Judgments regarding the nature of peritumoral adhesions, resectability, and personal technical skill may mediate decision-making. Many surgeons would prefer to refer patients than undertake complicated, lengthy cases.

Conclusion

Further research is required to validate these findings in larger studies and among patients undergoing surgery for conditions other than LAACRC, and evaluate strategies to improve rates of MVR through enhanced individual awareness and system capacity.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Lehnert T, Methner M, Pollok A, et al. Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients. Ann Surg 2002; 235:217–25.PubMedCrossRef Lehnert T, Methner M, Pollok A, et al. Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients. Ann Surg 2002; 235:217–25.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hunter JA, Ryan JA Jr, Schultz P. En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg 1987; 154:67–71.PubMedCrossRef Hunter JA, Ryan JA Jr, Schultz P. En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg 1987; 154:67–71.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gall FP, Tonak J, Altendorf A. Multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30:337–41.PubMedCrossRef Gall FP, Tonak J, Altendorf A. Multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30:337–41.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Visokai V, Lipska L, Bergmann P, et al. Multiorgan resections for advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2006; 26:3183–6.PubMed Visokai V, Lipska L, Bergmann P, et al. Multiorgan resections for advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2006; 26:3183–6.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gebhardt C, Meyer W, Ruckriegel S, et al. Multivisceral resection of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1999; 384:194–9.PubMedCrossRef Gebhardt C, Meyer W, Ruckriegel S, et al. Multivisceral resection of advanced colorectal carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1999; 384:194–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Izbicki JR, Hosch SB, Knoefel WT, et al. Extended resections are beneficial for patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:1251–6.PubMedCrossRef Izbicki JR, Hosch SB, Knoefel WT, et al. Extended resections are beneficial for patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:1251–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eisenberg SB, Kraybill WG, Lopez MJ. Long-term results of surgical resection of locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Surgery 1990; 108:779–85.PubMed Eisenberg SB, Kraybill WG, Lopez MJ. Long-term results of surgical resection of locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Surgery 1990; 108:779–85.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:583–96.PubMedCrossRef Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A, et al. Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:583–96.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1269–84.PubMedCrossRef Otchy D, Hyman NH, Simmang C, et al. Practice parameters for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1269–84.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Kilkenny JW, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:411–23.PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ, Kilkenny JW, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:411–23.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Govindarajan A, Coburn NG, Kiss A, et al. Population-based assessment of the surgical management of locally advanced colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:1474–81.PubMedCrossRef Govindarajan A, Coburn NG, Kiss A, et al. Population-based assessment of the surgical management of locally advanced colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:1474–81.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157:408–16. Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157:408–16.
16.
go back to reference Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, et al. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 153:1423–31. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, et al. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 153:1423–31.
17.
go back to reference Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, et al. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58:107–12.PubMedCrossRef Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, et al. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58:107–12.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13:330–4.PubMedCrossRef Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13:330–4.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gibbs VC. Patients safety practices in the operating room: correct-site surgery and nothing left behind. Surg Clin North Am 2005; 85:1307–19.PubMedCrossRef Gibbs VC. Patients safety practices in the operating room: correct-site surgery and nothing left behind. Surg Clin North Am 2005; 85:1307–19.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, et al. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 2006; 139:140–9.PubMedCrossRef Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, et al. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 2006; 139:140–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cotterchio M, McKeown-Eyssen G, Sutherland H, et al. Ontario familial colon cancer registry: methods and first-year response rates. Chronic Dis Can 2000; 21:81–6.PubMed Cotterchio M, McKeown-Eyssen G, Sutherland H, et al. Ontario familial colon cancer registry: methods and first-year response rates. Chronic Dis Can 2000; 21:81–6.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Novitsky YW, Sing RF, Kercher KW, et al. Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents. Am Surg 2005; 71:627–31.PubMed Novitsky YW, Sing RF, Kercher KW, et al. Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents. Am Surg 2005; 71:627–31.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Greene FL. Dictation of the operative note – a forgotten art form. Gen Surg News 2004; 31:1–6. Greene FL. Dictation of the operative note – a forgotten art form. Gen Surg News 2004; 31:1–6.
24.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures, techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures, techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
26.
go back to reference Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Br Med J 2000; 320:114–6.CrossRef Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Br Med J 2000; 320:114–6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB. Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press, 2003. Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB. Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press, 2003.
28.
go back to reference Samet J, Hunt WC, Key C, et al. Choice of cancer therapy varies with age of patient. J Am Med Assoc 1986; 255:3385–90.CrossRef Samet J, Hunt WC, Key C, et al. Choice of cancer therapy varies with age of patient. J Am Med Assoc 1986; 255:3385–90.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Greenfield S, Blanco DM, Elashoff RM, et al. Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients. J Am Med Assoc 1987; 257:2766–70.CrossRef Greenfield S, Blanco DM, Elashoff RM, et al. Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients. J Am Med Assoc 1987; 257:2766–70.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Townsley C, Pond GR, Peloza B, et al. Analysis of treatment practices for elderly cancer patients in Ontario, Canada. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:3802–10.PubMedCrossRef Townsley C, Pond GR, Peloza B, et al. Analysis of treatment practices for elderly cancer patients in Ontario, Canada. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:3802–10.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Luo R, Giordano SH, Zhang DD, et al. The role of the surgeon in whether patients with lymph node positive colon cancer see a medical oncologist. Cancer 2007; 109:975–82.PubMedCrossRef Luo R, Giordano SH, Zhang DD, et al. The role of the surgeon in whether patients with lymph node positive colon cancer see a medical oncologist. Cancer 2007; 109:975–82.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wright FC, DeVito C, Langer B, et al. and the Expert Panel on Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Standards. A systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43:1002–10.PubMedCrossRef Wright FC, DeVito C, Langer B, et al. and the Expert Panel on Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Standards. A systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43:1002–10.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Gossey JT, Davila JA, et al. Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:1320–8.PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Gossey JT, Davila JA, et al. Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:1320–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Newman EA, Guest AS, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 2006; 107:2346–51.PubMedCrossRef Newman EA, Guest AS, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 2006; 107:2346–51.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C, et al. Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and method of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Can 2003; 89:15–22.CrossRef Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C, et al. Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and method of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Can 2003; 89:15–22.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, et al. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol 2006; 17:457–60.PubMedCrossRef Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, et al. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol 2006; 17:457–60.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 2001; 91:1231–7.PubMedCrossRef Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 2001; 91:1231–7.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Wright FC, Anderson MAB, et al. The role of collegial interaction in continuing professional development. J Cont Ed Health Prof 2007; 27:214–9.CrossRef Gagliardi AR, Wright FC, Anderson MAB, et al. The role of collegial interaction in continuing professional development. J Cont Ed Health Prof 2007; 27:214–9.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Gagnon MP, Duplantie J, Fortin JP, et al. Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? Implement Sci 2006; 24:18.CrossRef Gagnon MP, Duplantie J, Fortin JP, et al. Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: what are the conditions for success? Implement Sci 2006; 24:18.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 296:1094–102.CrossRef Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 296:1094–102.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007; Nov 27 (epub) Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007; Nov 27 (epub)
42.
go back to reference Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15:433–6.PubMedCrossRef Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15:433–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of Multivisceral Resection in Patients with Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Authors
Anand Govindarajan, MD, MSc
Novlette Fraser, MA
Vanessa Cranford, MD
Debrah Wirtzfeld, MD
Steve Gallinger, MD
Calvin H. L. Law, MD, MPH
Andrew J. Smith, MD, MSc
Anna R. Gagliardi, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9930-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2008 Go to the issue