Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2008

01-10-2008 | Other

Technical Enhancements to Breast Ductal Lavage

Authors: Julianne Tondre, Mitra Nejad, Ashley Casano, Dixie Mills, MD, Susan Love

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ductal lavage is a technique that samples the contents of breast ducts for research into the biology of breast cancer. Enthusiasm for this method has declined because of technical challenges associated with the procedure. These include: difficulty in duct cannulation, high levels of subject discomfort, and an inability to confirm perforation.

Methods

As part of a larger institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, consenting healthy women underwent ductal lavage of 3–4 ducts in one breast. Intranipple lidocaine was administered before duct cannulation. Ductoscopy was performed prior to catheterization and high-definition ultrasound was used for imaging during the lavage procedure. Pain scores were recorded at 24 hours and 2 weeks. Subjects were asked to return in 6 months for a repeat of the procedure.

Results

Ductoscopy was performed prior to lavage under real-time ultrasound 308 times in 107 subjects. There were 280 confirmed ducts (90.9%) and 21 perforations (6.8%), while seven (2.3%) were indeterminate. Subjects reported minimal discomfort, and 91% reported a 0 (0–10 range) pain score 2 weeks after the procedure. The retention rate was 90% at 6 months.

Conclusion

The injection of lidocaine directly into the nipple greatly increases the feasibility of duct cannulation and improves subject comfort. Confirmation of duct cannulation and lavage can be documented with ductoscopy and ultrasound imaging. These procedures can be added to ductal lavage to facilitate its use as a research tool.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Goldstein LJ, et al. Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older. Cancer 2003; 98:918–25PubMedCrossRef Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Goldstein LJ, et al. Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older. Cancer 2003; 98:918–25PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 20:1546–54 Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 20:1546–54
3.
go back to reference Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359:909–19PubMedCrossRef Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359:909–19PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vacek PM, Geller BM, Weaver DL, et al. Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont: 1975–1999. Cancer 2002; 94:2160–8PubMedCrossRef Vacek PM, Geller BM, Weaver DL, et al. Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont: 1975–1999. Cancer 2002; 94:2160–8PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Petrakis NL. Physiologic, biochemical, and cytological aspects of nipple aspirate fluid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1986; 8:7–19PubMedCrossRef Petrakis NL. Physiologic, biochemical, and cytological aspects of nipple aspirate fluid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1986; 8:7–19PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Maddux AJ, Ashfaq R, Naftalis E, et al. Patient and duct selection for nipple duct lavage. Am J Surg 2004; 188:390–4PubMedCrossRef Maddux AJ, Ashfaq R, Naftalis E, et al. Patient and duct selection for nipple duct lavage. Am J Surg 2004; 188:390–4PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bushnaq ZI, Ashfaq R, Leitch AM, et al. Patient variables that predict atypical cytology by nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2007; 109:1247–54PubMedCrossRef Bushnaq ZI, Ashfaq R, Leitch AM, et al. Patient variables that predict atypical cytology by nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2007; 109:1247–54PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sharma P, Klemp JR, Simonsen M, et al. Failure of high risk women to produce nipple aspirate fluid does not exclude detection of cytologic atypia in random periareolar fine needle aspiration specimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 87:59–64PubMedCrossRef Sharma P, Klemp JR, Simonsen M, et al. Failure of high risk women to produce nipple aspirate fluid does not exclude detection of cytologic atypia in random periareolar fine needle aspiration specimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 87:59–64PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kurian AW, Mills MA, Jaffee M, et al. Ductal lavage of fluid-yielding and non-fluid-yielding ducts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and other women at high inherited breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:1082–9PubMedCrossRef Kurian AW, Mills MA, Jaffee M, et al. Ductal lavage of fluid-yielding and non-fluid-yielding ducts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and other women at high inherited breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:1082–9PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mitchell G, Antill YC, Murray W, et al. Nipple aspiration and ductal lavage in women with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7:R1122–31PubMedCrossRef Mitchell G, Antill YC, Murray W, et al. Nipple aspiration and ductal lavage in women with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7:R1122–31PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Thompson PA, et al. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology in breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 99:97–104PubMedCrossRef Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Thompson PA, et al. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology in breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 99:97–104PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Dooley WC, Ljung BM, Veronesi U, et al. Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:1624–32PubMedCrossRef Dooley WC, Ljung BM, Veronesi U, et al. Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:1624–32PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ljung BM, Chew KL, Moore DH, et al. Cytology of ductal lavage fluid of the breast. Diag Cytopathol 2004; 30:143–50CrossRef Ljung BM, Chew KL, Moore DH, et al. Cytology of ductal lavage fluid of the breast. Diag Cytopathol 2004; 30:143–50CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Badve S. Ductal lavage and its histopathologic basis: a cautionary tale. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:166–71PubMedCrossRef Badve S. Ductal lavage and its histopathologic basis: a cautionary tale. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:166–71PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Johnson-Maddux A, Ashfaq R, Cler L, et al. Reproducibility of cytologic atypia in repeat nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2005; 103:1129–36PubMedCrossRef Johnson-Maddux A, Ashfaq R, Cler L, et al. Reproducibility of cytologic atypia in repeat nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2005; 103:1129–36PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vogel VG. Atypia in the assessment of breast cancer risk: implications for management. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:151–7PubMedCrossRef Vogel VG. Atypia in the assessment of breast cancer risk: implications for management. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:151–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Visvanathan K, Santor D, Ali SZ, et al. The reliability of nipple aspirate and ductal lavage in women at increased risk for breast cancer—a potential tool for breast cancer risk assessment and biomarker evaluation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16:950–5PubMedCrossRef Visvanathan K, Santor D, Ali SZ, et al. The reliability of nipple aspirate and ductal lavage in women at increased risk for breast cancer—a potential tool for breast cancer risk assessment and biomarker evaluation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16:950–5PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patil DB, Lankes HA, Nayar R, et al. Reproducibility of ductal lavage cytology and cellularity over a six month interval in high risk women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007 (Epub ahead of print) Patil DB, Lankes HA, Nayar R, et al. Reproducibility of ductal lavage cytology and cellularity over a six month interval in high risk women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007 (Epub ahead of print)
19.
go back to reference Dietz JR, Kim JA, Malycky JL, et al. Feasibility and technical considerations of mammary ductoscopy in human mastectomy specimens. Breast J 2000; 6:161–5PubMedCrossRef Dietz JR, Kim JA, Malycky JL, et al. Feasibility and technical considerations of mammary ductoscopy in human mastectomy specimens. Breast J 2000; 6:161–5PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz LK, et al. A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg 2005; 241:575–81PubMedCrossRef Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz LK, et al. A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg 2005; 241:575–81PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kothari A, Beechey-Newman N, Kulkarni D. Breast duct micro-endoscopy: a study of technique and a morphological classification of endo-luminal lesions. Breast 2006; 15:363–9PubMedCrossRef Kothari A, Beechey-Newman N, Kulkarni D. Breast duct micro-endoscopy: a study of technique and a morphological classification of endo-luminal lesions. Breast 2006; 15:363–9PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Danforth DN, Abati A, Filie A, et al. Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94:555–64PubMedCrossRef Danforth DN, Abati A, Filie A, et al. Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94:555–64PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Redlich PN, Purdy AC, Shidham VB, et al. Feasibility of breast duct lavage performed by a physician extender. Surgery 2004; 136:1077–80PubMedCrossRef Redlich PN, Purdy AC, Shidham VB, et al. Feasibility of breast duct lavage performed by a physician extender. Surgery 2004; 136:1077–80PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy JA. Ductal lavage: clinical utility and future promise. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:753–69PubMedCrossRef O’Shaughnessy JA. Ductal lavage: clinical utility and future promise. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:753–69PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Arun B, Valero V, Logan C, et al. Comparison of ductal lavage and random periareolar fine needle aspiration as tissue acquisition methods in early breast cancer prevention trials. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:4943–8PubMedCrossRef Arun B, Valero V, Logan C, et al. Comparison of ductal lavage and random periareolar fine needle aspiration as tissue acquisition methods in early breast cancer prevention trials. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:4943–8PubMedCrossRef
27.
Metadata
Title
Technical Enhancements to Breast Ductal Lavage
Authors
Julianne Tondre
Mitra Nejad
Ashley Casano
Dixie Mills, MD
Susan Love
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0060-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2008 Go to the issue