Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016

01-12-2016 | Editorial

Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Adding Nuance to the Management of Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer

Author: Hiram S. Cody III, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Since the pioneering reports of Krag et al.1 and Giuliano et al.2 >10 years ago, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has emerged as a new method for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer and has become standard care at many institutions in the United States and worldwide. A current meta-analysis3 of 69 published studies of SLN biopsy validated by a backup axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) confirms an overall success rate of 96%, with the SLN falsely negative in 7.3% of node-positive cases. Observational studies have asked and answered many questions regarding definition, case selection, technique (nuclear medical, surgical, and pathologic), learning curve, and, most importantly, safety. The morbidity of SLN biopsy, although not zero, is less than that of ALND,4,5 and axillary local recurrence (LR) after a negative SLN biopsy is both comparable to that of ALND and vanishingly rare, occurring in 0.12% of our own patients at 30 months’ follow-up.6 It appears that few false-negative SLN procedures, if any, ever result in axillary LR. Three randomized trials5,7,8 of identical design address the survival equivalence of SLN biopsy and ALND and are almost certain to demonstrate no difference. Finally, two trials,7,9 through a physician- and patient-blinded design, promise an answer to the still-controversial subject of prognostic significance in immunohistochemically detected SLN micrometastases. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–40CrossRefPubMed Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–40CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 2006;106:4–16CrossRefPubMed Kim T, Giuliano AE, Lyman GH. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 2006;106:4–16CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Temple LK, Baron R, Cody HS III, et al. Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: a prospective study of 233 women. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:654–62CrossRefPubMed Temple LK, Baron R, Cody HS III, et al. Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: a prospective study of 233 women. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:654–62CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:546–53CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:546–53CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M, et al. The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures. Ann Surg 2004;240:462–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Naik AM, Fey J, Gemignani M, et al. The risk of axillary relapse after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer is comparable with that of axillary lymph node dissection: a follow-up study of 4008 procedures. Ann Surg 2004;240:462–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
go back to reference Clarke D, Newcombe RG, Mansel RE. The learning curve in sentinel node biopsy: the ALMANAC experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:211S–215SCrossRefPubMed Clarke D, Newcombe RG, Mansel RE. The learning curve in sentinel node biopsy: the ALMANAC experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:211S–215SCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N, Edwards GK, Conway K, Giuliano A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol (in press) Taback B, Nguyen P, Hansen N, Edwards GK, Conway K, Giuliano A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for local recurrence of breast cancer after breast conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol (in press)
11.
go back to reference Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:167–72CrossRefPubMed Port ER, Fey J, Gemignani ML, et al. Reoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy: a new option for patients with primary or locally recurrent breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:167–72CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227–32CrossRefPubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227–32CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233–41CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233–41CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van Tienhoven G, Voogd AC, Peterse JL, et al. Prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:32–8CrossRefPubMed van Tienhoven G, Voogd AC, Peterse JL, et al. Prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:32–8CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Bastert G, et al. Role of isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: results of four prospective studies. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1696–708PubMed Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Bastert G, et al. Role of isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: results of four prospective studies. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1696–708PubMed
17.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Martino S, et al. Outcome after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1367–73PubMed Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Martino S, et al. Outcome after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:1367–73PubMed
18.
go back to reference Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J, et al. Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:101–9PubMed Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J, et al. Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:101–9PubMed
Metadata
Title
Reoperative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Adding Nuance to the Management of Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer
Author
Hiram S. Cody III, MD
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.01.905

Other articles of this Special Issue 5/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016 Go to the issue