Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2021

01-09-2021 | Breast Cancer | Breast Oncology

Uptake of Breast Cancer Clinical Trials at Minority Serving Cancer Centers

Authors: Olga Kantor, MD, MS, Cecilia Chang, MS, Katharine Yao, MD, FACS, Judy Boughey, MD, FACS, Christina Roland, MD, FACS, Amanda B. Francescatti, MS, Sarah Blair, MD, FACS, Diana Dickson Witmer, MD, FACS, Kelly K. Hunt, MD, FACS, Heidi Nelson, MD, FACS, Anna Weiss, MD, Tawakalitu Oseni, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Most minorities receive cancer care at minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) that have been associated with disparate treatment between Black and White patients.

Objective

Our aim was to examine the uptake of clinical trials that have changed axillary management in breast cancer patients at MSH and non-MSH cancer centers.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients eligible for the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 and Z1071 trials, and mastectomy patients fulfilling the European AMAROS trial. Uptake of trial results (omission of axillary lymph node dissection) was analyzed between patients treated at MSHs and non-MSHs and adjusted for patient, tumor, and facility factors. MSHs were defined as the top decile of hospitals according to the proportion of Black and Hispanic patients treated.

Results

Of 7167 patients eligible for Z0011, 4546 for Z0171, and 9433 for AMAROS from 2015 to 2016, clinical trial uptake was seen in 1195 (74.6%) MSH and 4056 (72.9%) non-MSH patients (p = 0.173) for Z0011, 588 (41.9%) MSH and 1366 (43.5%) non-MSH patients for Z1071 (p = 0.302), and 272 (11.7%) MSH and 996 (14.0%) non-MSH patients (p = 0.005) for AMAROS. On adjusted analyses, MSH status was not significant for uptake of any of the three trials. Black race, socioeconomic status, and insurance were not associated with clinical trial uptake.

Conclusion

The uptake of three landmark clinical trials of axillary management in breast cancer was not different at MSH and non-MSH centers despite adjustment for social determinants of health. At the Commission on Cancer-accredited centers in this analysis, MSH status did not affect the uptake of evidence-based care.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Singh GK, Jemal A. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival in the United States, 1950–2014: over six decades of changing patterns and widening inequalities. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:2819372.CrossRef Singh GK, Jemal A. Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival in the United States, 1950–2014: over six decades of changing patterns and widening inequalities. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:2819372.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Singh GK, Williams SD, Siahpush M, Mulhollen A. Socioeconomic, rural-urban, and racial inequalities in US cancer mortality: part I-all cancers and lung cancer and part II-colorectal, prostate, breast, and cervical cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;2011:107497.CrossRef Singh GK, Williams SD, Siahpush M, Mulhollen A. Socioeconomic, rural-urban, and racial inequalities in US cancer mortality: part I-all cancers and lung cancer and part II-colorectal, prostate, breast, and cervical cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;2011:107497.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ellis L, Canchola AJ, Spiegel D, Ladabaum U, Haile R, Gomez SL. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer survival: the contribution of tumor, sociodemographic, institutional, and neighborhood characteristics. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(1):25–33.CrossRef Ellis L, Canchola AJ, Spiegel D, Ladabaum U, Haile R, Gomez SL. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer survival: the contribution of tumor, sociodemographic, institutional, and neighborhood characteristics. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(1):25–33.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):438–451.CrossRef DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):438–451.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):439–448.CrossRef DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):439–448.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jemal A, Robbins AS, Lin CC, et al. Factors that contributed to black-white disparities in survival among nonelderly women with breast cancer between 2004 and 2013. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(1):14–24.CrossRef Jemal A, Robbins AS, Lin CC, et al. Factors that contributed to black-white disparities in survival among nonelderly women with breast cancer between 2004 and 2013. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(1):14–24.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ko NY, Hong S, Winn RA, Calip GS. Association of insurance status and racial disparities with the detection of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(3):385–392.CrossRef Ko NY, Hong S, Winn RA, Calip GS. Association of insurance status and racial disparities with the detection of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(3):385–392.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yedjou CG, Tchounwou PB, Payton M, et al. Assessing the racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):486.CrossRef Yedjou CG, Tchounwou PB, Payton M, et al. Assessing the racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):486.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Freedman RA, Virgo KS, He Y, et al. The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care. Cancer. 2011;117(1):180–189.CrossRef Freedman RA, Virgo KS, He Y, et al. The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care. Cancer. 2011;117(1):180–189.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Keating NL, Kouri E, He Y, Weeks JC, Winer EP. Racial differences in definitive breast cancer therapy in older women: are they explained by the hospitals where patients undergo surgery? Med Care. 2009;47(7):765–773.CrossRef Keating NL, Kouri E, He Y, Weeks JC, Winer EP. Racial differences in definitive breast cancer therapy in older women: are they explained by the hospitals where patients undergo surgery? Med Care. 2009;47(7):765–773.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Keating NL, Kouri EM, He Y, Freedman RA, Volya R, Zaslavsky AM. Location isn’t everything: proximity, hospital characteristics, choice of hospital, and disparities for breast cancer surgery patients. Health Serv Res. 2016;51(4):1561–1583.CrossRef Keating NL, Kouri EM, He Y, Freedman RA, Volya R, Zaslavsky AM. Location isn’t everything: proximity, hospital characteristics, choice of hospital, and disparities for breast cancer surgery patients. Health Serv Res. 2016;51(4):1561–1583.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Krimphove MJ, Fletcher SA, Cole AP, et al. Quality of care in the treatment of localized intermediate and high risk prostate cancer at minority serving hospitals. J Urol. 2019;201(4):735–741.CrossRef Krimphove MJ, Fletcher SA, Cole AP, et al. Quality of care in the treatment of localized intermediate and high risk prostate cancer at minority serving hospitals. J Urol. 2019;201(4):735–741.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gamble CR, Huang Y, Tergas AI, et al. Quality of care and outcomes of patients with gynecologic malignancies treated at safety-net hospitals. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019;3(3):pkz039.CrossRef Gamble CR, Huang Y, Tergas AI, et al. Quality of care and outcomes of patients with gynecologic malignancies treated at safety-net hospitals. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019;3(3):pkz039.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liu FW, Randall LM, Tewari KS, Bristow RE. Racial disparities and patterns of ovarian cancer surgical care in California. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(1):221–226.CrossRef Liu FW, Randall LM, Tewari KS, Bristow RE. Racial disparities and patterns of ovarian cancer surgical care in California. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132(1):221–226.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cole AP, Nguyen DD, Meirkhanov A, et al. Association of care at minority-serving vs non-minority-serving hospitals with use of palliative care among racial/ethnic minorities with metastatic cancer in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(2):e187633.CrossRef Cole AP, Nguyen DD, Meirkhanov A, et al. Association of care at minority-serving vs non-minority-serving hospitals with use of palliative care among racial/ethnic minorities with metastatic cancer in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(2):e187633.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305(6):569–575.CrossRef Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305(6):569–575.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(10):918–926.CrossRef Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(10):918–926.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1455–1461.CrossRef Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1455–1461.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1303–1310.CrossRef Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1303–1310.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rutgers EJ, Donker M, Poncet C, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer patients: 10 year follow up results of the EORTC AMAROS trial (EORTC 10981/22023). Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 6 December 2018; San Antonio, TX. Rutgers EJ, Donker M, Poncet C, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer patients: 10 year follow up results of the EORTC AMAROS trial (EORTC 10981/22023). Paper presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 6 December 2018; San Antonio, TX.
22.
go back to reference Yao K, Liederbach E, Pesce C, Wang CH, Winchester DJ. Impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial on the number of axillary nodes removed for patients with early-stage breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(1):71–81.CrossRef Yao K, Liederbach E, Pesce C, Wang CH, Winchester DJ. Impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial on the number of axillary nodes removed for patients with early-stage breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(1):71–81.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Tucker SL, et al. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011: impact on surgeon practice patterns. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3144–3151.CrossRef Caudle AS, Hunt KK, Tucker SL, et al. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011: impact on surgeon practice patterns. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3144–3151.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Caudle AS, Bedrosian I, Milton DR, et al. Use of sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis: practice patterns of American Society of Breast Surgeons members. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):2925–2934.CrossRef Caudle AS, Bedrosian I, Milton DR, et al. Use of sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis: practice patterns of American Society of Breast Surgeons members. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):2925–2934.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Srour MK, Tseng J, Luu M, Alban RF, Giuliano AE, Chung A. Patterns in the use of axillary operations for patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(10):3305–3311.CrossRef Srour MK, Tseng J, Luu M, Alban RF, Giuliano AE, Chung A. Patterns in the use of axillary operations for patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(10):3305–3311.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Grossmith S, Nguyen A, Hu J, et al. Multidisciplinary management of the axilla in patients with cT1-T2 N0 breast cancer undergoing primary mastectomy: results from a prospective single-institution series. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3527–3534.CrossRef Grossmith S, Nguyen A, Hu J, et al. Multidisciplinary management of the axilla in patients with cT1-T2 N0 breast cancer undergoing primary mastectomy: results from a prospective single-institution series. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3527–3534.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Weiss A, Lin H, Babiera GV, et al. Evolution in practice patterns of axillary management following mastectomy in patients with 1–2 positive sentinel nodes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176(2):435–444.CrossRef Weiss A, Lin H, Babiera GV, et al. Evolution in practice patterns of axillary management following mastectomy in patients with 1–2 positive sentinel nodes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176(2):435–444.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–690.CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–690.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720–2726.CrossRef Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720–2726.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chen MS Jr, Lara PN, Dang JH, Paterniti DA, Kelly K. Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials. Cancer. 2014;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091–1096. Chen MS Jr, Lara PN, Dang JH, Paterniti DA, Kelly K. Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials. Cancer. 2014;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091–1096.
36.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4177–4181.CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4177–4181.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bensenhaver J, Winchester DP. Surgical leadership and standardization of multidisciplinary breast cancer care: the evolution of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014;23(3):609–616.CrossRef Bensenhaver J, Winchester DP. Surgical leadership and standardization of multidisciplinary breast cancer care: the evolution of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014;23(3):609–616.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Knutson AC, McNamara EJ, McKellar DP, Kaufman CS, Winchester DP. The role of the American College of Surgeons’ cancer program accreditation in influencing oncologic outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(5):611–615.CrossRef Knutson AC, McNamara EJ, McKellar DP, Kaufman CS, Winchester DP. The role of the American College of Surgeons’ cancer program accreditation in influencing oncologic outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(5):611–615.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Kantor O, Wang CH, Yao K. Regional variation in performance for commission on cancer breast quality measures and impact on overall survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):3069–3075.CrossRef Kantor O, Wang CH, Yao K. Regional variation in performance for commission on cancer breast quality measures and impact on overall survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):3069–3075.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Miller ME, Bleicher RJ, Kaufman CS, et al. Impact of breast center accreditation on compliance with breast quality performance measures at commission on cancer-accredited centers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(5):1202–1211.CrossRef Miller ME, Bleicher RJ, Kaufman CS, et al. Impact of breast center accreditation on compliance with breast quality performance measures at commission on cancer-accredited centers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(5):1202–1211.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA. 2011;305(7):675–681.CrossRef Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA. 2011;305(7):675–681.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Uptake of Breast Cancer Clinical Trials at Minority Serving Cancer Centers
Authors
Olga Kantor, MD, MS
Cecilia Chang, MS
Katharine Yao, MD, FACS
Judy Boughey, MD, FACS
Christina Roland, MD, FACS
Amanda B. Francescatti, MS
Sarah Blair, MD, FACS
Diana Dickson Witmer, MD, FACS
Kelly K. Hunt, MD, FACS
Heidi Nelson, MD, FACS
Anna Weiss, MD
Tawakalitu Oseni, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-09-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09533-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2021 Go to the issue