Published in:
01-08-2021 | NSCLC | Thoracic Oncology
Validation of the 8th Edition Nodal Staging and Proposal of New Nodal Categories for Future Editions of the TNM Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2021
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) N classifications, which depend on the location and involvement of the lymph nodes, provide accurate prognoses. This study validated the efficiency of classifications using a single-institution dataset and proposed a modified system based on 5-level N1 node dissection.
Methods
From January 2005 to December 2014, 1851 patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer were reviewed. According to the IASLC recommendations, N1 is further subdivided into N1a (single) and N1b (multiple), N2 is divided into N2a1 (single station without N1), N2a2 (single station with N1), and N2b (multiple station). Additionally, we evaluated dividing N0 into N0a (with level 13/14 examination) and N0b (without level 13/14 examination), and N1 into N1a* (only level 13/14 positive) and N1b* (level 10–12 positive). Overall survival was also compared.
Results
Multivariate analysis showed that the N classifications recommended by the IASLC and those proposed and evaluated by this study could both significantly predict the prognoses of patients (p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in survival between N1b and N1a (hazard ratio [HR] 1.049, p = 0.83) and N2a1 and N1b (HR 1.314, p = 0.261); however, there were significant differences between N0a and N0b (HR 1.778, p < 0.001) and N1a* and N1b* (HR 2.014, p = 0.019). The survival curve of N1a* overlapped N0b (HR 0.997, p = 0.991), and N2a1 overlapped N1b* (HR 0.842, p = 0.444).
Conclusion
More detailed nodal information is required to facilitate future revisions of N staging.