Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2021

01-08-2021 | Mastectomy | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Do Shorter Tumor-to-Nipple Distances Compromise the Local Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?

Authors: Zhen-Yu Wu, MD, PhD, Jing Han, MD, Jin Sup Eom, MD, PhD, Sei-Hyun Ahn, MD, PhD, BeomSeok Ko, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

The indications for therapeutic nipple-spring mastectomy (NSM) remain controversial, particularly in terms of the tumor-to-nipple distance (TND). A short TND strongly predicts nipple–areola complex (NAC) involvement.1 Accordingly, several past NSM series excluded patients with a TND shorter than 2 cm or less than 1 cm from the NSM considering the increased risk of occult nipple involvement.2,3 Dent et al.4 reported no significant differences in NAC involvement risk between a TND of 1 cm or less and a TND greater than 1 cm after NSM (measured using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography) and suggested that a TND of 1 cm or less is not a contraindication to NSM. However, whether a short TND is subsequently associated with an increased risk of recurrence at NAC or detrimental to overall local oncologic safety after a successful NSM with a negative retroareolar resection margin remains unclear because the long-term follow-up data on local recurrence outcomes are insufficient. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Alonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2311–8.CrossRef D’Alonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple–areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2311–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.CrossRef Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple–areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple–areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101.CrossRef Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple–areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114:97–101.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1e–8e.CrossRef Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1e–8e.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Do Shorter Tumor-to-Nipple Distances Compromise the Local Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy?
Authors
Zhen-Yu Wu, MD, PhD
Jing Han, MD
Jin Sup Eom, MD, PhD
Sei-Hyun Ahn, MD, PhD
BeomSeok Ko, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Mastectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09453-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2021 Go to the issue