Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Pancreatic Tumors

Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Survival Predicted by Ki67

Authors: C. G. Genç, MD, M. Falconi, MD, PhD, S. Partelli, MD, F. Muffatti, MD, S. van Eeden, MD, PhD, C. Doglioni, MD, PhD, H. J. Klümpen, MD, PhD, C. H. J. van Eijck, MD, PhD, E. J. M. Nieveen van Dijkum, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite evidence of different malignant potentials, postoperative follow-up assessment is similar for G1 and G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) and adjuvant treatment currently is not indicated. This study investigated the role of Ki67 with regard to recurrence and survival after curative resection of panNET.

Methods

Patients with resected non-functioning panNET diagnosed between 1992 and 2016 from three institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who had G1 or G2 tumor without distant metastases or hereditary syndromes were included in the study. The patients were re-categorized into Ki67 0–5 and Ki67 6–20%. Cox regression analysis with log-rank testing for recurrence and survival was performed.

Results

The study enrolled 241 patients (86%) with Ki67 0–5% and 39 patients (14%) with Ki67 6–20%. Recurrence was seen in 34 patients (14%) with Ki67 0–5% after a median period of 34 months and in 16 patients (41%) with Ki67 6–20% after a median period of 16 months (p < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free and 10-year disease-specific survival periods were respectively 90 and 91% for Ki67 0–5% and respectively 55 and 26% for Ki67 6–20% (p < 0.001). The overall survival period after recurrence was 44.9 months, which was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.283). In addition to a Ki67 rate higher than 5%, tumor larger than 4 cm and lymph node metastases were independently associated with recurrence.

Conclusions

Patients at high risk for recurrence after curative resection of G1 or G2 panNET can be identified by a Ki67 rate higher than 5%. These patients should be more closely monitored postoperatively to detect recurrence early and might benefit from adjuvant treatment. A clear postoperative follow-up regimen is proposed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G, et al. ENETS Consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:153–171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G, et al. ENETS Consensus guidelines update for the management of patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:153–171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Fischer L, Kleeff J, Esposito I, et al. Clinical outcome and long-term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 2008;95:627–35.CrossRefPubMed Fischer L, Kleeff J, Esposito I, et al. Clinical outcome and long-term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 2008;95:627–35.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference La Rosa S, Klersy C, Uccella S, et al. Improved histologic and clinicopathologic criteria for prognostic evaluation of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:30–40.CrossRefPubMed La Rosa S, Klersy C, Uccella S, et al. Improved histologic and clinicopathologic criteria for prognostic evaluation of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:30–40.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pape UF, Jann H, Muller-Nordhorn J, et al. Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer. 2008;113:256–65.CrossRefPubMed Pape UF, Jann H, Muller-Nordhorn J, et al. Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer. 2008;113:256–65.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Scarpa A, Mantovani W, Capelli P, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients. Mod Pathol. 2010;23:824–33.CrossRefPubMed Scarpa A, Mantovani W, Capelli P, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients. Mod Pathol. 2010;23:824–33.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pezzilli R, Partelli S, Cannizzaro R, et al. Ki-67 prognostic and therapeutic decision driven marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs): a systematic review. Adv Med Sci. 2016;61:147–53.CrossRefPubMed Pezzilli R, Partelli S, Cannizzaro R, et al. Ki-67 prognostic and therapeutic decision driven marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs): a systematic review. Adv Med Sci. 2016;61:147–53.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Genc CG, Jilesen AP, Partelli S, et al. A new scoring system to predict recurrent disease in grade 1 and 2 nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg. 2018;267:1148–54.CrossRefPubMed Genc CG, Jilesen AP, Partelli S, et al. A new scoring system to predict recurrent disease in grade 1 and 2 nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg. 2018;267:1148–54.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–12.CrossRefPubMed Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–12.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Endl E, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: fascinating forms and an unknown function. Exp Cell Res. 2000;257:231–7.CrossRefPubMed Endl E, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: fascinating forms and an unknown function. Exp Cell Res. 2000;257:231–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Farrell JM, Pang JC, Kim GE, Tabatabai ZL. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: accurate grading with Ki-67 index on fine-needle aspiration specimens using the WHO 2010/ENETS criteria. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:770–8.CrossRefPubMed Farrell JM, Pang JC, Kim GE, Tabatabai ZL. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: accurate grading with Ki-67 index on fine-needle aspiration specimens using the WHO 2010/ENETS criteria. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:770–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:74–87.CrossRefPubMed Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:74–87.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rindi G, Kloppel G, Couvelard A, et al. TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2007;451:757–62.CrossRefPubMed Rindi G, Kloppel G, Couvelard A, et al. TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2007;451:757–62.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rindi G, Kloppel G, Alhman H, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:395–401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rindi G, Kloppel G, Alhman H, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:395–401.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Genc CG, Klumpen HJ, van Oijen MGH, van Eijck CHJ, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM. A nationwide population-based study on the survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in The Netherlands. World J Surg. 2018;42:490–7.CrossRefPubMed Genc CG, Klumpen HJ, van Oijen MGH, van Eijck CHJ, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM. A nationwide population-based study on the survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in The Netherlands. World J Surg. 2018;42:490–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Reid MD, Balci S, Saka B, Adsay NV. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: current concepts and controversies. Endocr Pathol. 2014;25:65–79.CrossRefPubMed Reid MD, Balci S, Saka B, Adsay NV. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: current concepts and controversies. Endocr Pathol. 2014;25:65–79.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, et al. WHO 2010 classification of pancreatic endocrine tumors. is the new always better than the old? Pancreatology. 2014;14:539–41.CrossRefPubMed Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, et al. WHO 2010 classification of pancreatic endocrine tumors. is the new always better than the old? Pancreatology. 2014;14:539–41.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, et al. Validation of the 2010 WHO classification and a new prognostic proposal: a single-centre retrospective study of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Pancreatology. 2016;16:403–10.CrossRefPubMed Ricci C, Casadei R, Taffurelli G, et al. Validation of the 2010 WHO classification and a new prognostic proposal: a single-centre retrospective study of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Pancreatology. 2016;16:403–10.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J. WHO Classification of Tumous of Endocrine Organs, 4th ed., vol 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2017. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J. WHO Classification of Tumous of Endocrine Organs, 4th ed., vol 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2017.
19.
go back to reference Velayoudom-Cephise FL, Duvillard P, Foucan L, et al. Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:649–57.CrossRefPubMed Velayoudom-Cephise FL, Duvillard P, Foucan L, et al. Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:649–57.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tanaka H, Matsusaki S, Baba Y, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor G3: a pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with a high proliferative rate. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2015;8:414–20.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka H, Matsusaki S, Baba Y, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor G3: a pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with a high proliferative rate. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2015;8:414–20.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Garcia-Carbonero R, Sorbye H, Baudin E, et al. ENETS Consensus guidelines for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:186–94.CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Carbonero R, Sorbye H, Baudin E, et al. ENETS Consensus guidelines for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:186–94.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mazzaferro V, Pulvirenti A, Coppa J. Neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: how to select patients for liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2007;47:460–6.CrossRefPubMed Mazzaferro V, Pulvirenti A, Coppa J. Neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: how to select patients for liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2007;47:460–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Caplin ME, Pavel M, Cwikla JB, et al. Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:224–33.CrossRefPubMed Caplin ME, Pavel M, Cwikla JB, et al. Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:224–33.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pelosi G, Bresaola E, Bogina G, et al. Endocrine tumors of the pancreas: Ki-67 immunoreactivity on paraffin sections is an independent predictor for malignancy: a comparative study with proliferating-cell nuclear antigen and progesterone receptor protein immunostaining, mitotic index, and other clinicopathologic variables. Hum Pathol. 1996;27:1124–34.CrossRefPubMed Pelosi G, Bresaola E, Bogina G, et al. Endocrine tumors of the pancreas: Ki-67 immunoreactivity on paraffin sections is an independent predictor for malignancy: a comparative study with proliferating-cell nuclear antigen and progesterone receptor protein immunostaining, mitotic index, and other clinicopathologic variables. Hum Pathol. 1996;27:1124–34.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, et al. TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:764–77.CrossRefPubMed Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, et al. TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:764–77.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ballian N, Loeffler AG, Rajamanickam V, Norstedt PA, Weber SM, Cho CS. A simplified prognostic system for resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. HPB Oxford. 2009;11:422–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ballian N, Loeffler AG, Rajamanickam V, Norstedt PA, Weber SM, Cho CS. A simplified prognostic system for resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. HPB Oxford. 2009;11:422–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Birnbaum DJ, Gaujoux S, Cherif R, et al. Sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: prognostic significance of incidental diagnosis. Surgery. 2014;155:13–21.CrossRefPubMed Birnbaum DJ, Gaujoux S, Cherif R, et al. Sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: prognostic significance of incidental diagnosis. Surgery. 2014;155:13–21.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO Classification of Tumors, 4th ed., vol 3. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2010. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO Classification of Tumors, 4th ed., vol 3. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2010.
29.
go back to reference Stephenson TJ, Cross SS, Chetty R. Standards and datasets for reporting cancers: dataset for neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract including pancreas, 3rd ed. R Coll Pathol. 2013;12–13. http://ukeps.com/docs/gimds.pdf. Stephenson TJ, Cross SS, Chetty R. Standards and datasets for reporting cancers: dataset for neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract including pancreas, 3rd ed. R Coll Pathol. 2013;12–13. http://​ukeps.​com/​docs/​gimds.​pdf.
30.
go back to reference Newson R. Confidence intervals for rank statistics: percentile slopes, differences, and ratios. Stata J. 2006;6:497–520. Newson R. Confidence intervals for rank statistics: percentile slopes, differences, and ratios. Stata J. 2006;6:497–520.
31.
go back to reference Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Walsh M, et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2017;318:1377–84.CrossRefPubMed Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Walsh M, et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2017;318:1377–84.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Leening MJ, Vedder MM, Witteman JC, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW. Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician’s guide. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:122–31.CrossRefPubMed Leening MJ, Vedder MM, Witteman JC, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW. Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician’s guide. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:122–31.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sadowski SM, Neychev V, Millo C, et al. Prospective study of 68 Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and unknown primary sites. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:588–96.CrossRefPubMed Sadowski SM, Neychev V, Millo C, et al. Prospective study of 68 Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and unknown primary sites. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:588–96.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Mojtahedi A, Thamake S, Tworowska I, Ranganathan D, Delpassand ES. The value of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors compared to current FDA-approved imaging modalities: a review of literature. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;4:426–34.PubMedPubMedCentral Mojtahedi A, Thamake S, Tworowska I, Ranganathan D, Delpassand ES. The value of (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors compared to current FDA-approved imaging modalities: a review of literature. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;4:426–34.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Haidar M, Shamseddine A, Panagiotidis E, et al. The role of 68 Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in evaluating neuroendocrine tumors: real-world experience from two large neuroendocrine tumor centers. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:170–7.CrossRefPubMed Haidar M, Shamseddine A, Panagiotidis E, et al. The role of 68 Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in evaluating neuroendocrine tumors: real-world experience from two large neuroendocrine tumor centers. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:170–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Panagiotidis E, Alshammari A, Michopoulou S, et al. Comparison of the impact of 68 Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT on clinical management in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:91–6.CrossRefPubMed Panagiotidis E, Alshammari A, Michopoulou S, et al. Comparison of the impact of 68 Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT on clinical management in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:91–6.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Farchione A, Rufini V, Brizi MG, et al. Evaluation of the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional magnetic resonance imaging in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and comparison with 68 Ga-DOTANOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Pancreas. 2016;45:345–54.CrossRefPubMed Farchione A, Rufini V, Brizi MG, et al. Evaluation of the added value of diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional magnetic resonance imaging in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and comparison with 68 Ga-DOTANOC positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Pancreas. 2016;45:345–54.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Custodio CM, Cem Balci N, Woosley JT. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: spectrum of appearances on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:141–8.CrossRefPubMed Semelka RC, Custodio CM, Cem Balci N, Woosley JT. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: spectrum of appearances on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:141–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Foti G, Boninsegna L, Falconi M, Mucelli RP. Preoperative assessment of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumours: role of MDCT and MRI. Radiol Med. 2013;118:1082–101.CrossRefPubMed Foti G, Boninsegna L, Falconi M, Mucelli RP. Preoperative assessment of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumours: role of MDCT and MRI. Radiol Med. 2013;118:1082–101.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Survival Predicted by Ki67
Authors
C. G. Genç, MD
M. Falconi, MD, PhD
S. Partelli, MD
F. Muffatti, MD
S. van Eeden, MD, PhD
C. Doglioni, MD, PhD
H. J. Klümpen, MD, PhD
C. H. J. van Eijck, MD, PhD
E. J. M. Nieveen van Dijkum, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6518-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2018 Go to the issue