Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2017

01-10-2017 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

“Pancreas-Compressionless Gastrectomy”: A Novel Laparoscopic Approach for Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection

Authors: Masahiro Tsujiura, MD, PhD, Naoki Hiki, MD, PhD, Manabu Ohashi, MD, PhD, Souya Nunobe, MD, PhD, Koshi Kumagai, MD, PhD, Satoshi Ida, MD, PhD, Yasuhiro Okumura, MD, Takeshi Sano, MD, PhD, Toshiharu Yamaguchi, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In radical operations for gastric cancer, a balance between the quality of lymph node dissection and safety of surgery must be ensured. During suprapancreatic lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), an adequate operative field should be safely and effectively established to reduce pancreas-related complications. We present a novel approach that avoids direct compression of the pancreas in LG and describe the surgical outcomes of this method.

Methods

We historically compressed the pancreas during suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in LG to obtain an adequate operative field but have since modified our operative technique. In our new method introduced in March 2016, the operative field is established by pulling and controlling the connective tissues along the inferior border of the pancreas and the nerves along the common hepatic and splenic arteries, instead of directly compressing the pancreas itself. We compared 51 patients in the compression group (January 2015–February 2016) and 45 patients in the compressionless group (March 2016–January 2017) in terms of surgical outcomes, including the amylase concentration in the drainage fluid and postoperative complications.

Results

The amylase concentrations in the compressionless group were significantly lower on postoperative days 1 and 3 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.013, respectively) compared with the compression group. The rates of severe postoperative pancreatic fistula and intra-abdominal infectious complications decreased from 11.8 to 2.2% (p = 0.116) and from 17.6 and 2.2% (p = 0.018), respectively.

Conclusions

Our approach, termed “pancreas-compressionless gastrectomy,” can be considered a safe and useful method to prevent postoperative infectious complications in LG.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(2):146–8.PubMed Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(2):146–8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):446–56.CrossRefPubMed Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):446–56.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hosono S, Arimoto Y, Ohtani H, Kanamiya Y. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(47):7676–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hosono S, Arimoto Y, Ohtani H, Kanamiya Y. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(47):7676–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Yakoub D, Athanasiou T, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it an alternative to the open approach? Surg Oncol. 2009;18(4):322–33.CrossRefPubMed Yakoub D, Athanasiou T, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it an alternative to the open approach? Surg Oncol. 2009;18(4):322–33.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):39–52.CrossRefPubMed Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):39–52.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(4):238–44.CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13(4):238–44.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Obama K, Okabe H, Hosogi H, Tanaka E, Itami A, Sakai Y. Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications. Surgery. 2011;149(1):15–21.CrossRefPubMed Obama K, Okabe H, Hosogi H, Tanaka E, Itami A, Sakai Y. Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications. Surgery. 2011;149(1):15–21.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fujita T, Ohta M, Ozaki Y, et al. Collateral thermal damage to the pancreas by ultrasonic instruments during lymph node dissection in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8(3):281–8.CrossRefPubMed Fujita T, Ohta M, Ozaki Y, et al. Collateral thermal damage to the pancreas by ultrasonic instruments during lymph node dissection in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8(3):281–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jeong O, Ryu SY, Zhao XF, Jung MR, Kim KY, Park YK. Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(12):3418–25.CrossRefPubMed Jeong O, Ryu SY, Zhao XF, Jung MR, Kim KY, Park YK. Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(12):3418–25.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC, van der Tweel I, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1509–20.CrossRefPubMed Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC, van der Tweel I, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1509–20.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. Excellent long-term prognosis and favorable postoperative nutritional status after laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5828-0 Tsujiura M, Hiki N, Ohashi M, et al. Excellent long-term prognosis and favorable postoperative nutritional status after laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-017-5828-0
13.
go back to reference Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Tokunaga M, et al. Left-sided approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy without duodenal transection. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(2):106–12.CrossRefPubMed Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Tokunaga M, et al. Left-sided approach for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy without duodenal transection. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(2):106–12.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Kubota T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2676–82.CrossRefPubMed Fukunaga T, Hiki N, Kubota T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2676–82.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Irino T, Hiki N, Ohashi M, Nunobe S, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):245–50.CrossRefPubMed Irino T, Hiki N, Ohashi M, Nunobe S, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. The Hit and Away technique: optimal usage of the ultrasonic scalpel in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):245–50.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1427–29.CrossRefPubMed Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1427–29.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gao T, Lau BE, Yamaguchi T, et al. Experimental analyses of the cavitation generated by ultrasonically activated surgical devices. Surg Today. 2016;47(1), 122–129CrossRefPubMed Gao T, Lau BE, Yamaguchi T, et al. Experimental analyses of the cavitation generated by ultrasonically activated surgical devices. Surg Today. 2016;47(1), 122–129CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Migita K, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, et al. The anatomical location of the pancreas is associated with the incidence of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12): 5481–5489CrossRefPubMed Migita K, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, et al. The anatomical location of the pancreas is associated with the incidence of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12): 5481–5489CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kobayashi N, Shinohara H, Haruta S, et al. Process of pancreas head as a risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2194–201.CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi N, Shinohara H, Haruta S, et al. Process of pancreas head as a risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2194–201.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
“Pancreas-Compressionless Gastrectomy”: A Novel Laparoscopic Approach for Suprapancreatic Lymph Node Dissection
Authors
Masahiro Tsujiura, MD, PhD
Naoki Hiki, MD, PhD
Manabu Ohashi, MD, PhD
Souya Nunobe, MD, PhD
Koshi Kumagai, MD, PhD
Satoshi Ida, MD, PhD
Yasuhiro Okumura, MD
Takeshi Sano, MD, PhD
Toshiharu Yamaguchi, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5974-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2017 Go to the issue