Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2016

Open Access 01-08-2016 | Thoracic Oncology

Waiting Time from Diagnosis to Treatment has no Impact on Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Authors: E. Visser, MD, A. G. Leeftink, MSc, P. S. N. van Rossum, MD, S. Siesling, MD, PhD, R. van Hillegersberg, MD, PhD, J. P. Ruurda, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Waiting time from diagnosis to treatment has emerged as an important quality indicator in cancer care. This study was designed to determine the impact of waiting time on long-term outcome of patients with esophageal cancer who are treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery or primary surgery.

Methods

Patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at the University Medical Center Utrecht between 2003 and 2014 were included. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and treated with primary surgery were separately analyzed. The influence of waiting time on survival was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Kaplan–Meier curves for short (<8 weeks) and long (≥8 weeks) waiting times were constructed.

Results

A total of 351 patients were included; 214 received neoadjuvant treatment, and 137 underwent primary surgery. In the neoadjuvant group, the waiting time had no impact on disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.88–1.04; p = 0.312] or overall survival (OS) (HR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.88–1.05; p = 0.372). Accordingly, no differences were found between neoadjuvantly treated patients with waiting times of <8 and ≥8 weeks in terms of DFS (p = 0.506) and OS (p = 0.693). In the primary surgery group, the waiting time had no impact on DFS (HR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.95–1.12; p = 0.443) or OS (HR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.99–1.13; p = 0.108). Waiting times of <8 weeks versus ≥8 weeks did not result in differences regarding DFS (p = 0.884) or OS (p = 0.374).

Conclusions

In esophageal cancer patients treated with curative intent by either neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery or primary surgery, waiting time from diagnosis to treatment has no impact on long-term outcome.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.CrossRefPubMed Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference van der Sluis PC, Ubink I, van der Horst S, et al. Safety, efficacy, and long-term follow-up evaluation of perioperative epirubicin, Cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy in esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1555–63.CrossRefPubMed van der Sluis PC, Ubink I, van der Horst S, et al. Safety, efficacy, and long-term follow-up evaluation of perioperative epirubicin, Cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy in esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1555–63.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dutch Cancer Society. Advies inzake wachttijdnormen in de kankerzorg. Amsterdam: Signaleringscommissie Kanker, Werkgroep: ‘Wachtlijstproblematiek, specifiek gericht op de patient met kanker’. 2006. Dutch Cancer Society. Advies inzake wachttijdnormen in de kankerzorg. Amsterdam: Signaleringscommissie Kanker, Werkgroep: ‘Wachtlijstproblematiek, specifiek gericht op de patient met kanker’. 2006.
9.
go back to reference VWS, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Brief Nieuwe wachttijdenregistratie; 30 mei. 2008. VWS, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Brief Nieuwe wachttijdenregistratie; 30 mei. 2008.
10.
go back to reference Cimprich B. Pretreatment symptom distress in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1999;22:185–94.CrossRefPubMed Cimprich B. Pretreatment symptom distress in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1999;22:185–94.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mor V, Allen S, Malin M. The psychosocial impact of cancer on older versus younger patients and their families. Cancer. 1994;74:2118–27.CrossRefPubMed Mor V, Allen S, Malin M. The psychosocial impact of cancer on older versus younger patients and their families. Cancer. 1994;74:2118–27.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Visser MR, van Lanschot JJ, van der Velden J, Kloek JJ, Gouma DJ, Sprangers MA. Quality of life in newly diagnosed cancer patients waiting for surgery is seriously impaired. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:571–7.CrossRefPubMed Visser MR, van Lanschot JJ, van der Velden J, Kloek JJ, Gouma DJ, Sprangers MA. Quality of life in newly diagnosed cancer patients waiting for surgery is seriously impaired. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:571–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang J, Liu F, Gao H, et al. The symptom-to-treatment delay and stage at the time of treatment in cancer of esophagus. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:87–91.CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Liu F, Gao H, et al. The symptom-to-treatment delay and stage at the time of treatment in cancer of esophagus. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:87–91.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rothwell JF, Feehan E, Reid I, Walsh TN, Hennessy TP. Delay in treatment for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:690–3.CrossRefPubMed Rothwell JF, Feehan E, Reid I, Walsh TN, Hennessy TP. Delay in treatment for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 1997;84:690–3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Witzig R, Schonberger B, Fink U, et al. Delays in diagnosis and therapy of gastric cancer and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopy. 2006;38:1122–6.CrossRefPubMed Witzig R, Schonberger B, Fink U, et al. Delays in diagnosis and therapy of gastric cancer and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopy. 2006;38:1122–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Kotz BS, Croft S, Ferry DR. Do delays between diagnosis and surgery in resectable oesophageal cancer affect survival? A study based on West Midlands cancer registration data. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:835–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kotz BS, Croft S, Ferry DR. Do delays between diagnosis and surgery in resectable oesophageal cancer affect survival? A study based on West Midlands cancer registration data. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:835–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Grotenhuis BA, van Hagen P, Wijnhoven BP, Spaander MC, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ. Delay in diagnostic workup and treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:476–83.CrossRefPubMed Grotenhuis BA, van Hagen P, Wijnhoven BP, Spaander MC, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ. Delay in diagnostic workup and treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:476–83.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–74.CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–74.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Verhage RJ, Zandvoort HJ, ten Kate FJ, van Hillegersberg R. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:919–26.CrossRefPubMed Verhage RJ, Zandvoort HJ, ten Kate FJ, van Hillegersberg R. How to define a positive circumferential resection margin in T3 adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:919–26.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Blom RL, Lagarde SM, van Oudenaarde K, et al. Survival after recurrent esophageal carcinoma has not improved over the past 18 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2693–8.CrossRefPubMed Blom RL, Lagarde SM, van Oudenaarde K, et al. Survival after recurrent esophageal carcinoma has not improved over the past 18 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2693–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Parry K, Visser E, van Rossum PS, Mohammad NH, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Prognosis and treatment after diagnosis of recurrent esophageal carcinoma following esophagectomy with curative intent. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22 Suppl 3:1292–300.CrossRefPubMedCentral Parry K, Visser E, van Rossum PS, Mohammad NH, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Prognosis and treatment after diagnosis of recurrent esophageal carcinoma following esophagectomy with curative intent. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22 Suppl 3:1292–300.CrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999;353:1119–26.CrossRefPubMed Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999;353:1119–26.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Smith EC, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Delay in surgical treatment and survival after breast cancer diagnosis in young women by race/ethnicity. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:516–23.CrossRefPubMed Smith EC, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H. Delay in surgical treatment and survival after breast cancer diagnosis in young women by race/ethnicity. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:516–23.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Torring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Vedsted P. Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:2187–98.CrossRefPubMed Torring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Vedsted P. Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:2187–98.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Gonzalez-Barcala FJ, Garcia-Prim JM, Alvarez-Dobano JM, et al. Effect of delays on survival in patients with lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2010;12:836–42.CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Barcala FJ, Garcia-Prim JM, Alvarez-Dobano JM, et al. Effect of delays on survival in patients with lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2010;12:836–42.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Yun YH, Kim YA, Min YH, et al. The influence of hospital volume and surgical treatment delay on long-term survival after cancer surgery. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2731–7.CrossRefPubMed Yun YH, Kim YA, Min YH, et al. The influence of hospital volume and surgical treatment delay on long-term survival after cancer surgery. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2731–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference McLean SR, Karsanji D, Wilson J, et al. The effect of wait times on oncological outcomes from periampullary adenocarcinomas. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:853–8.CrossRefPubMed McLean SR, Karsanji D, Wilson J, et al. The effect of wait times on oncological outcomes from periampullary adenocarcinomas. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:853–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Pruitt SL, Harzke AJ, Davidson NO, Schootman M. Do diagnostic and treatment delays for colorectal cancer increase risk of death? Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24:961–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pruitt SL, Harzke AJ, Davidson NO, Schootman M. Do diagnostic and treatment delays for colorectal cancer increase risk of death? Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24:961–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Currie AC, Evans J, Smith NJ, Brown G, Abulafi AM, Swift RI. The impact of the two-week wait referral pathway on rectal cancer survival. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:848–53.CrossRefPubMed Currie AC, Evans J, Smith NJ, Brown G, Abulafi AM, Swift RI. The impact of the two-week wait referral pathway on rectal cancer survival. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:848–53.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Thompson MR, Asiimwe A, Flashman K, Tsavellas G. Is earlier referral and investigation of bowel cancer patients presenting with rectal bleeding associated with better survival? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:1242–8.CrossRefPubMed Thompson MR, Asiimwe A, Flashman K, Tsavellas G. Is earlier referral and investigation of bowel cancer patients presenting with rectal bleeding associated with better survival? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:1242–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Gray RE, Fitch MI, Phillips C, Labrecque M, Klotz L. Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Pract. 1999;7:130–5.CrossRefPubMed Gray RE, Fitch MI, Phillips C, Labrecque M, Klotz L. Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Pract. 1999;7:130–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Jones RV, Greenwood B. Breast cancer: causes of patients’ distress identified by qualitative analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:370–1.PubMedPubMedCentral Jones RV, Greenwood B. Breast cancer: causes of patients’ distress identified by qualitative analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:370–1.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Rapoport Y, Kreitler S, Chaitchik S, Algor R, Weissler K. Psychosocial problems in head-and-neck cancer patients and their change with time since diagnosis. Ann Oncol. 1993;4:69–73.PubMed Rapoport Y, Kreitler S, Chaitchik S, Algor R, Weissler K. Psychosocial problems in head-and-neck cancer patients and their change with time since diagnosis. Ann Oncol. 1993;4:69–73.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Ahn S, Cho J, Park CK, Kim S, Kim K. A large cohort of consecutive patients confirmed frequent HER2-positivity in gastric carcinomas with advanced stages. Lab Invest. 2013;93:142A. Ahn S, Cho J, Park CK, Kim S, Kim K. A large cohort of consecutive patients confirmed frequent HER2-positivity in gastric carcinomas with advanced stages. Lab Invest. 2013;93:142A.
37.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.CrossRefPubMed Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1662–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Waiting Time from Diagnosis to Treatment has no Impact on Survival in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
Authors
E. Visser, MD
A. G. Leeftink, MSc
P. S. N. van Rossum, MD
S. Siesling, MD, PhD
R. van Hillegersberg, MD, PhD
J. P. Ruurda, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5191-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2016 Go to the issue